Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Trust the government? JK...
Trust the government? JK...
By Deezer Shoove
20 Mar 2025 10:42 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
26 Mar 2025 2:33 pm
JohnnyYou » 25 Mar 2025, 3:17 am » wrote: ↑ The Mod Glob is a good name for the Trump admin. Did you hear anything more about Biden's Prosecutor found dead in her home? All I heard was "natural causes"
I am hoping my Bro In Laws health care doesn't get DOGE'd. It would be less harmful to you if he just died and I think that is Elon's plan for millions of phoolks. Thank you for any contribution to the well being of the those in need.
they could save money and not drop medicaid. office visits are very expensive and they could open low cost health care clinics which would reduce expenses.
26 Mar 2025 3:37 pm
a republican congressman from my state was not thrilled with the budget plan. I am pretty sure he is listening to sanders and all the voters protesting.DeezerShoove » 26 Mar 2025, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑You've obviously never contacted an elected official before.
26 Mar 2025 3:53 pm
Does this babbling *** ever make any sense?JohnnyYou » 25 Mar 2025, 3:17 am » wrote: ↑ The Mod Glob is a good name for the Trump admin. Did you hear anything more about Biden's Prosecutor found dead in her home? All I heard was "natural causes"
I am hoping my Bro In Laws health care doesn't get DOGE'd. It would be less harmful to you if he just died and I think that is Elon's plan for millions of phoolks. Thank you for any contribution to the well being of the those in need.
26 Mar 2025 4:40 pm
It takes some brain work dude.
26 Mar 2025 4:45 pm
That counts your *** *** out.
26 Mar 2025 4:46 pm
Lying media fed child molester.jerrab » 26 Mar 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ this time more cuts for the rich. and the money will be made up by cutting programs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The economic policy of the first Trump administration was characterized by the individual and corporate tax cuts, attempts to repeal the Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare"), trade protectionism, deregulation focused on the energy and financial sectors, and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
26 Mar 2025 6:14 pm
26 Mar 2025 7:01 pm
jerrab » 26 Mar 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ a republican congressman from my state was not thrilled with the budget plan. I am pretty sure he is listening to sanders and all the voters protesting.
Contact him. Demand his support.
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
26 Mar 2025 7:49 pm
26 Mar 2025 7:50 pm
26 Mar 2025 7:52 pm
26 Mar 2025 8:26 pm
Let's review YOUR position for credibility.HarperLee » 21 Mar 2025, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑ I watched the video
Nothing new
I'm convinced that Oswald acted alone.
The idea that the CIA, FBI, Secret Service, the Mafia, the Dallas Police all got together to murder JFK is just too dumb to believe
Many hundreds of westerners - some of high social standing - defected to the USSR. Of these, many dozens were disillusioned and sought repatriation - but were denied it. I can only name ONE American who successfully defected to the Soviet Union, lived, worked, and married there, and was able to re-enter the United States - with his bride, to boot. And that one is Lee Harvey Oswald. In the same year that he is alleged to have shot the magic bullet into Kennedy's head, he tried to defect to Cuba at their embassy in Mexico City - but was turned away.
So we have this unicorn - the only American who ever defected to the soviet union and managed to convince BOTH the soviets to let him go AND the Americans to accept him back. There's a very difficult scenario to explain away. But we're not done. He was on the streets of new orleans handing out broadsheets as a radical political agitator, drawing maximum attention to himself as a nutcase. Almost like putting a frame around himself for an upcoming event. How he supported himself in these endeavors is not known. He was provided funding from somewhere - and likely encouragement. To view him as an asset with a handler would be rather sensible. To view him otherwise would take a lot of splaining, lucy.
Then we have to believe that the Secret Service, which absolutely knew about this politically radical repatriated unicorn, accidentally allowed him to get close enough to a president to blow his brains out. Then we have to believe that as he was screeching to all who would listen that he was a patsy, the police accidentally allowed him to be murdered while in custody. And every bit of this depends upon you buying the magic bullet theory in the first place - AND ignoring the testimony of witnesses, AND ignoring the shabby work of the warren commission, which included turning a blind eye to the false evidence placed beside the president's deceased head.
So I guess you took the vax like a good little sheep - and believed the natural origin lie.HarperLee » 21 Mar 2025, 5:48 am » wrote: ↑ You'd have to have hundreds of people involved and it just never happened.
They couldn't keep this secret among themselves for 5 minutes.
After all, look how many people would have to be "in on it." THOUSANDS.
Derp.
And I guess you believe the federal reserve is a perfectly legitimate enterprise of the U.S. government. If it weren't, look how many people would have to be in on it.
Climate change is OF COURSE real science. I mean, **** - look how many people would have to be in on it.
And transgenderism is perfectly natural - not at all an artificially created social contagion. I mean, look how many people would have to be in on it.
The problem with your "in on it" argument is that silence is extremely cheap to buy. All you need is one carrot, and one stick. And when you get that one in a million whistleblower who will not be silenced - think Snowden - you try your very best to murder him. Right out in the open, if necessary.
How many Snowdens DIDN'T get away - got silenced? Were THEY "in on it"? In your argument, they absolutely were. Dead men tell no tales. Dead men are "in on it."
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:33 pm
Yes, people not confessing to murder is quite odd, I agree.HarperLee » 21 Mar 2025, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ The murder of a president is somewhat complicated.
The idea that numerous government agencies got together and pulled it off is dumb.
Odd...
No one ever admitted being part of this murder with evidence.?
I mean, every day I wake up expecting people to confess to any murders they might have gotten away with.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:38 pm
That is not the half of it. Security around Oswald should have been even tighter BEFORE the killing of Kennedy. Identifying potential threats is job one of the secret service detail protecting a president. Oswald was 500 miles from Dallas, and Kennedy's appearance there was public news for days in advance. There'd have been a watch on a radical political agitator who had previously defected to the soviet union and then been allowed back into the country - the only case of that happening ever. A guy like that? A unicorn with a (LITERAL) bullhorn? Give me a break. That guy would be eyes-on 24/7 even WITHOUT a presidential visit in a town near him.RebelGator » 21 Mar 2025, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑ You would think security would have been pretty tight around Oswald but Jack Ruby managed to kill him....a guy that was conveniently dying of cancer. That tied up a lot of loose ends and stretched the bounds of coincidence a bit much for me.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:39 pm
No, you're fishing for something to snipe from cover at.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:40 pm
Gosh, I can't think of a single reason.HarperLee » 21 Mar 2025, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ The idea that so many had access to Oswald is alarming.
However, Ruby lingered in jail for years and never gave any conspiracy facts.
Why not tell the truth if he was dying.?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:40 pm
26 Mar 2025 8:41 pm
So now we are respecting hear say that could be bought or extorted, elicited to throw shade at a film.HarperLee » 21 Mar 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ Yes
Earl Ruby in an interview...
After the JFK movie in the mid 90s
LMAO - you are one gullible broad.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:48 pm
We'll just have to take your word for that.
How many people were in on this explanation?
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
26 Mar 2025 8:49 pm
Carter tried.DeezerShoove » 21 Mar 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ I believe so. They do more harm than good. By far.
I'm no PollyAnna about it.
Having a "scary arm of the gubmint" is probably a necessary evil in this world.
But an entrenched bunch of careerists eventually get all too comfortable and invulnerable.
I don't know the backstory to The New Scotland Yard, but The New CIA's time has come.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 1370 users online :: 19 registered, 16 bots, and 1335 guests
Registered users: *Huey, Blackvegetable, *GHETTO BLASTER, Vegas, Mrkelly, SouthernFried, Skans, Johnny You, 31st Arrival, Deezer Shoove, murdock, Fuelman, *Beekeeper, ConservativeWave, nefarious101, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, MR-7
Bots: LCC, Applebot, Feedfetcher-Google, Not, Yahoo! Slurp, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, proximic, YandexBot, ADmantX, semantic-visions.com, linkfluence.com, Googlebot, app.hypefactors.com, curl/7, bingbot