Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 21 Mar 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

21 Mar 2025, 8:07 am

Are these your words?

Asking for a friend....

NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 21 Mar 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Mar 2025, 10:41 am

How do you know he wasn't paid to say that....[or else be found dead of a heart attack]...?

Carrot and stick. Works on hundreds. Gets em "in on it."

I can remember the McDougals. They would rather SIT IN PRISON than open their mouths against the Clintons.

I remember Cheney shooting a fella with a shotgun, and as soon as that fella was able to speak, he apologized for getting in Cheney's way. 

He and the McDougals were "in on it."
 

Sumela » 21 Mar 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

21 Mar 2025, 11:41 am

Just another Flumpous nothing burger...just like the Epstein release....

Just like ceasefires in Pissrael and Uke/Russia.

Just like Tulsi and RFK suddenly becoming Zionist Neocons 101.

Just more...deep state Empire 101.

They turned RFK, too?

Say it ain't so.
 

HarperLee » 21 Mar 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Mar 2025, 1:36 pm

I don't know
But after 60 years every thing is speculation and theories.

Earl Ruby said his brother told him he acted alone....

But ..
Doesn't mean Oswald did...

Think...
With all these people in the so called conspiracy wouldn't Oswald be dead immediately and not 2 days later?

Not every plan goes smoothly. Duh. It is very likely that the Dallas cops got to Oswald before the hit team that was supposed to catch him fleeing. So they had to put a plan b in place. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2025, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 8:54 pm

They turned RFK, too?

Say it ain't so.

Paying the bills
 

Sumela » 26 Mar 2025, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 7:49 pm

BIG GOVT FLUMP the FAT ****!!!

BILLIONS for the ***-47 money pit...

Go Flumper go!

Choke on your mothers *** you lying ****!

Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2025, 8:38 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 8:38 pm

That is not the half of it. Security around Oswald should have been even tighter BEFORE the killing of Kennedy. Identifying potential threats is job one of the secret service detail protecting a president. Oswald was 500 miles from Dallas, and Kennedy's appearance there was public news for days in advance. There'd have been a watch on a radical political agitator who had previously defected to the soviet union and then been allowed back into the country - the only case of that happening ever. A guy like that? A unicorn with a (LITERAL) bullhorn? Give me a break. That guy would be eyes-on 24/7 even WITHOUT a presidential visit in a town near him.

the route changed  to go past his work.

one possibility is he would be the perfect person to blame something with his background.

also he was denied a lawyer for the crime of a century.

Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2025, 8:49 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 8:49 pm

Carter tried.

It's only gotten worse since.
...and they had one of their own as president.  

DeezerShoove » 26 Mar 2025, 10:14 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 10:14 pm

It's only gotten worse since.
...and they had one of their own as president.

The day he dies, the KKKlintons went from bowing up on people to looking over their shoulders. 

He was their button. 
 

Cannonpointer » 26 Mar 2025, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 10:16 pm

The day he dies, the KKKlintons went from bowing up on people to looking over their shoulders. 

He was their button.

Strange bedfellows indeed. At least when viewed as opposing parties out to defeat each other.
Just like people dismissing the notion of a deep state shadow government,
the school of thought that there's just one "uniparty" (both acting at the behest of a single source of power),
both views have become rather solid to me over time.

The government has a relationship of us-versus-them regarding the citizenry. Sad but true.

DeezerShoove » 26 Mar 2025, 10:26 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 10:26 pm

Strange bedfellows indeed. At least when viewed as opposing parties out to defeat each other.
Just like people dismissing the notion of a deep state shadow government,
the school of thought that there's just one "uniparty" (both acting at the behest of a single source of power),
both views have become rather solid to me over time.

The government has a relationship of us-versus-them regarding the citizenry. Sad but true.

This guy is one of the stronger analysts I've seen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fe8h0NIx5aE
 

JohnnyYou » 25 Mar 2025, 3:17 am » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 3:17 am

The Mod Glob is a good name for the Trump admin.  Did you hear anything more about Biden's Prosecutor found dead in her home? All I heard was "natural causes"

I am hoping my Bro In Laws health care doesn't get DOGE'd. It would be less harmful to you if he just died and I think that is Elon's plan for millions of phoolks. Thank you for any contribution to the well being of the those in need.

https://youtu.be/e0vIoiQR_yQ?si=tz_TIfu5IvvclZqQ

DeezerShoove » 26 Mar 2025, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 7:01 pm

Contact him. Demand his support.

bernie sanders is doing a pretty good job.


many republican voters may not like the cuts.

 

DeezerShoove » 26 Mar 2025, 7:01 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 7:01 pm

Contact him. Demand his support.

bernie sanders' speech.

skip to .19

https://www.youtube.com/live/C232Zq_MUF ... U52nNE5IXD
 

jerrab » Yesterday, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:58 pm

bernie sanders' speech.

skip to .19

https://www.youtube.com/live/C232Zq_MUF ... U52nNE5IXD

Rallies and protests don't do a thing for me. Ever.
Boring and impotent. Staged energy and fake empathy... yuk...

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 1:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:22 pm

Rallies and protests don't do a thing for me. Ever.
Boring and impotent. Staged energy and fake empathy... yuk...

congress is paying attention especially if they want to win elections.

-------------------------
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/2 ... s-00205542

House Republicans who represent large numbers of Medicaid recipients are pushing back on their leaders’ plans to slash billions in funding for the insurance program for low-income people.That dissension could grow considering that President Donald Trump has made the GOP more appealing to the working class. Republicans rely on low-income voters more than they have in decades, with Trump the first Republican presidential candidate to win the poorest third of the electorate since the 1960s.A POLITICO review of enrollment in Medicaid by congressional district found that 11 Republicans in competitive seats represent larger-than-average Medicaid populations — collectively nearly 2.7 million recipients. A vote to cut the program presents a politically sensitive decision that may come back to haunt them in 2026.With a 218-215 House split — the tightest in modern history — Republicans will be fighting for every seat during the midterms to keep control of the chamber. And they can only lose one vote in the House and still pass their budget bill.House Republican leaders plan to use Medicaid cuts to pay for tax relief, border security and energy production in the coming weeks.“The bulk of these cuts would have to be in Medicaid, and that’s why they’re not going to get the requisite votes they need to get it passed with the margins that they have right now,” said Bill Hoagland, senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former GOP Senate Budget Committee staffer. “Leaders are going to have a lot of difficulty getting the votes to pass this resolution.” ******It may be having an effect.Valadao’s central California district is perennially in play — Valadao is in his sixth term but lost one in the middle — and more than 3 in 5 of his constituents, more than 470,000 people, rely on Medicaid, according to NYU Langone Health’s estimate.He was among six Republican representatives and two territorial delegates who recently signed a letter to Speaker Mike Johnson warning that “slashing Medicaid would have serious consequences, particularly in rural and predominantly Hispanic communities.”Also among the signers were Bresnahan and Juan Ciscomani, a second-term Republican from Arizona who represents Tucson suburbs and rural areas to the east. He won reelection by less than 3 percentage points. Nearly a quarter of his constituents rely on Medicaid.Bresnahan, who represents a mix of suburban and rural communities in northeastern Pennsylvania, said in a statement earlier this month he would not
 

https://calbudgetcenter.org/resources/r ... -in-ca-40/

jerrab » Yesterday, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:07 pm

congress is paying attention especially if they want to win elections.

-------------------------
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/2 ... s-00205542

House Republicans who represent large numbers of Medicaid recipients are pushing back on their leaders’ plans to slash billions in funding for the insurance program for low-income people.That dissension could grow considering that President Donald Trump has made the GOP more appealing to the working class. Republicans rely on low-income voters more than they have in decades, with Trump the first Republican presidential candidate to win the poorest third of the electorate since the 1960s.A POLITICO review of enrollment in Medicaid by congressional district found that 11 Republicans in competitive seats represent larger-than-average Medicaid populations — collectively nearly 2.7 million recipients. A vote to cut the program presents a politically sensitive decision that may come back to haunt them in 2026.With a 218-215 House split — the tightest in modern history — Republicans will be fighting for every seat during the midterms to keep control of the chamber. And they can only lose one vote in the House and still pass their budget bill.House Republican leaders plan to use Medicaid cuts to pay for tax relief, border security and energy production in the coming weeks.“The bulk of these cuts would have to be in Medicaid, and that’s why they’re not going to get the requisite votes they need to get it passed with the margins that they have right now,” said Bill Hoagland, senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and a former GOP Senate Budget Committee staffer. “Leaders are going to have a lot of difficulty getting the votes to pass this resolution.” ******It may be having an effect.Valadao’s central California district is perennially in play — Valadao is in his sixth term but lost one in the middle — and more than 3 in 5 of his constituents, more than 470,000 people, rely on Medicaid, according to NYU Langone Health’s estimate.He was among six Republican representatives and two territorial delegates who recently signed a letter to Speaker Mike Johnson warning that “slashing Medicaid would have serious consequences, particularly in rural and predominantly Hispanic communities.”Also among the signers were Bresnahan and Juan Ciscomani, a second-term Republican from Arizona who represents Tucson suburbs and rural areas to the east. He won reelection by less than 3 percentage points. Nearly a quarter of his constituents rely on Medicaid.Bresnahan, who represents a mix of suburban and rural communities in northeastern Pennsylvania, said in a statement earlier this month he would not

I guess I'm not a very good "joiner". So, nix on the PR parades.
My ego isn't big and phony enough to "represent". So, nix on public office.
I have just enough money to make until the end of the world. So, nix on worrying every detail to death.  

jerrab » Yesterday, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:30 pm

https://youtu.be/e0vIoiQR_yQ?si=tz_TIfu5IvvclZqQ

I don't know who Governor Little is.  No time to get context from videos.

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:27 pm

I guess I'm not a very good "joiner". So, nix on the PR parades.
My ego isn't big and phony enough to "represent". So, nix on public office.
I have just enough money to make until the end of the world. So, nix on worrying every detail to death.

I am not asking you to join