You stated Connally was involved so he was shot too?
I never said connally was involved. I said he was shot too. a victim.HarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 4:37 am » wrote: ↑ You stated Connally was involved so he was shot too?
And you suggested there were 5 shooters that day?
And you stated that someone used Oswald's gun at the TSBD?
Every argument on this crime brings in more and more people involved.
And it makes no sense.
5 shooters?
That would mean 7 bullets.
Do you realize MOST of them had to miss everything?
Makes no sense .
the magic bullet--- not concluded by police work or medical science but only by someone in the warren commision, arlen spectorHarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 4:37 am » wrote: ↑ You stated Connally was involved so he was shot too?
And you suggested there were 5 shooters that day?
And you stated that someone used Oswald's gun at the TSBD?
Every argument on this crime brings in more and more people involved.
And it makes no sense.
5 shooters?
That would mean 7 bullets.
Do you realize MOST of them had to miss everything?
Makes no sense .
Already been therejerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ the magic bullet--- not concluded by police work or medical science but only by someone in the warren commision, arlen spector
-----------------------------------------------
https://history-matters.com/essays/fram ... agical.htm
Among the myriad JFK assassination controversies, none more cleanly divides Warren Commission supporter from skeptic than the “Single Bullet Theory.” The brainchild of a former Warren Commission lawyer, Mr. Arlen Specter, now the senior Senator from Pennsylvania, the theory is the sine qua non of the Warren Commission’s case that with but three shots, including one that missed, Lee Harvey Oswald had single handedly altered the course of history. [Fig. 1]
Mr. Specter’s hypothesis was not one that immediately leapt to mind from the original evidence and the circumstances of the shooting. It was, rather, born of necessity, if one sees as a necessity the keeping of Oswald standing alone in the dock. The theory had to contend with the considerable evidence there was suggesting that more than one shooter was involved.
Since the magic bullet is bothering you...jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ the magic bullet--- not concluded by police work or medical science but only by someone in the warren commision, arlen spector
-----------------------------------------------
https://history-matters.com/essays/fram ... agical.htm
Among the myriad JFK assassination controversies, none more cleanly divides Warren Commission supporter from skeptic than the “Single Bullet Theory.” The brainchild of a former Warren Commission lawyer, Mr. Arlen Specter, now the senior Senator from Pennsylvania, the theory is the sine qua non of the Warren Commission’s case that with but three shots, including one that missed, Lee Harvey Oswald had single handedly altered the course of history. [Fig. 1]
Mr. Specter’s hypothesis was not one that immediately leapt to mind from the original evidence and the circumstances of the shooting. It was, rather, born of necessity, if one sees as a necessity the keeping of Oswald standing alone in the dock. The theory had to contend with the considerable evidence there was suggesting that more than one shooter was involved.
you are brainwashed into believing something physically impossible, the magic bullet.HarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Already been there
You post that there were 5 shooters and 7 bullets
Where's all the other bullets that were fired?
You also stated you think someone else fired Oswald's gun?
Who?
Where's all the other bullets that you claim were fired?jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ you are brainwashed into believing something physically impossible, the magic bullet.
It is NOT impossiblejerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ you are brainwashed into believing something physically impossible, the magic bullet.
HarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ It is NOT impossible
Numerous people have been shot by one bullet in combat.
Wrong again ..jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ and they get hit instantly- not 10 seconds later like connally did.
Again...HarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ Where's all the other bullets that you claim were fired?
5 shooters
7 bullets at least
Where are they?
You should know....jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ and they get hit instantly- not 10 seconds later like connally did.
https://youtu.be/NZt2paw9T70?si=I7l9qIZ1CqEm-kZ0HarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ Wrong again ..
So now the governor waited 10 seconds to realize he was shot?
Really?
jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/NZt2paw9T70?si=I7l9qIZ1CqEm-kZ0
1.00
he turned around after kennedy was shot. and then he was shot.
and he says there was a third shot. the first shot hit kennedy, the second shot hit connally and the third shot hit kennedy again.
Can you show us where he waited 10 seconds?jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ https://youtu.be/NZt2paw9T70?si=I7l9qIZ1CqEm-kZ0
1.00
he turned around after kennedy was shot. and then he was shot.
and he says there was a third shot. the first shot hit kennedy, the second shot hit connally and the third shot hit kennedy again.
HarperLee » 05 Apr 2025, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you show us where he waited 10 seconds?
Never heard that before..
And where did all the other bullets land from the other shooters?
And who fired Oswald's gun from the TSBD?