Liberal Forum

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 5:51 am

Doctors and autopsy reports say differently.

Throat was an exit wound according to doctors that looked the body.

And if you think the shot came from the grassy knoll then the bullet would enter from the "side".

--------------------------------------------

Controversy concerning the commission report arose due to a physician in the overall disarray describing the neck wound from the second shot as a bullet entrance from the front throat [26], [76], [84], [88]

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 11:32 am

--------------------------------------------

Controversy concerning the commission report arose due to a physician in the overall disarray describing the neck wound from the second shot as a bullet entrance from the front throat [26], [76], [84], [88]

Yes...
I'm fully aware there was a doctor that was unsure about the wound.

The majority of the doctors felt the entry wound was in the back
 

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 12:22 pm

Yes...
I'm fully aware there was a doctor that was unsure about the wound.

The majority of the doctors felt the entry wound was in the back

if the gun shot was from the back kennedy would have fallen frontwards towards the seat in front of him. one of those newton laws.

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:57 am » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:57 am

You're wrong.

He was shot in the back of the neck according to the autopsy.
His reaction was to reach out to his throat where the bullet exited.
 
It's not the complicated

----------------
if the gun shot was from the back kennedy would have fallen frontwards towards the seat in front of him. one of those newton laws.**************

When an object is hit, it moves in the direction of the force applied, which is explained by Newton's Second Law of motion, stating that force equals mass times acceleration (F=ma), meaning the object accelerates in the direction of the net force. 
 

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 3:28 pm

----------------
if the gun shot was from the back kennedy would have fallen frontwards towards the seat in front of him. one of those newton laws.**************

When an object is hit, it moves in the direction of the force applied, which is explained by Newton's Second Law of motion, stating that force equals mass times acceleration (F=ma), meaning the object accelerates in the direction of the net force.

Wrong again...
Getting shot from the back does not mean you fall forwards.
And keep in mind...
There was a seat in front of Kennedy that was occupied 

Kennedy was shot from the back
Doctors testified to it.
The gun was found 
It had Oswald's fingerprints on it.

 
And tell us....
If the shots were from the front then how did Connally get shot from the back?

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm

if the gun shot was from the back kennedy would have fallen frontwards towards the seat in front of him. one of those newton laws.

Tell us
If the shots were from the front why didn't Connally get shot from the front?
 

jerrab » 05 Apr 2025, 10:43 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Apr 2025, 10:43 pm

https://pol.illinoisstate.edu/downloads ... IPAC05.pdf

for safekeeping

-------------------------

https://pol.illinoisstate.edu/downloads ... IPAC05.pdf

The first victims of AIPAC’s attacks were Representatives Paul N. (Pete) McCloskey and Paul Findley. Representative McCloskey’s first sin was to have repeatedly said that if an incumbent administration couldn’t keep the Israel Lobby from blocking its Middle East policies, it was time to take the issue to the people. (Curtiss 39) At the time of this comment 1978-1982, public support for the “Land for Peace” idea was strong and both the Carter and Reagan were strong supporters of the plan. In order to keep its goals on track AIPAC set-up an all-out war on Representative McCloskey and targeted him as a larger threat to Israel than all of the Arab nations combined. Donors from all over the country poured money into California to unseat McCloskey. AIPAC’s labeling of McCloskey as an enemy of Israel caused many pro-Israel PAC’s to shell money out to McCloskey’s opponent. At the time there were over 30 pro-Israel PAC’

***********************

AIPAC was fearful that Representative Findley would begin to pool support for the PLO and the Palestinians. They decided to make sure in his 1982 campaign; there was no way for him to win. First, the 1980 census required a re-drawing of the legislative districts. Three maps were made, of which two almost guaranteed Findley victory, while the other almost guaranteed defeat. (Curtiss 30) There were three judges deciding on the maps; two Republicans and one Democrat. To the surprise of many one of the Republican judges, a supporter and sympathizer of AIPAC, voted with the Democrat, ensuring Findley’s defeat. (Findley 23) To help make sure defeat was guaranteed, AIPAC mobilized college student volunteers from across the country, encouraged pro-Israel PAC’s to donate large sums to Findley’s opponent, Richard Durbin, and made it almost impossible for Findley to get anyone to come to fundraisers on his behalf. (Rubenberg 374) 51% of Richard Durbin’s donations came for out of state contributors, and under the direction of AIPAC, $104,325 came into Durbin’s campaign from Pro-Israel PAC’s. AIPAC also sent 200 Student volunteers to do door to door canvassing for Durbin.

--------------------------------------

all this pro israel lobbying in american politics is something kennedy wanted to stop. anyone against israel and whatever it does to the palestinians will not get elected but whoever supports israel will get millions of dollars from israel so most of dc all are supporters of israel.


and yes, this includes trump.
 

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 3:49 pm

Tell us
If the shots were from the front why didn't Connally get shot from the front?

he got shot from the left side of the road

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:10 pm

he got shot from the left side of the road

Seriously?
Connally was shot in the back

Look it up

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:15 pm

Seriously?
Connally was shot in the back

Look it up

watch  the video. his back was facing the left side of the road.

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:15 pm

Seriously?
Connally was shot in the back

Look it up

2.95//  connally's back was facing the left side of the road when he gets shot.

https://youtu.be/_zwG3QdPLfw?si=1cGiScRNQmAjsDJm

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:19 pm

watch  the video. his back was facing the left side of the road.

Connally's wounds were in the back..

So tell us

How can I guy sitting in a front seat be shot in the back?

Where did the bullet come from?

His BACK wasn't exposed
 

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:29 pm

Connally's wounds were in the back..

So tell us

How can I guy sitting in a front seat be shot in the back?

Where did the bullet come from?

His BACK wasn't exposed

dumb ****- when they turn around.

watch the video.

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:31 pm

dumb ****- when they turn around.

watch the video.

And why did he turn around,?

Cause Kennedy was just shot 

Are you saying doctors lied ?

 Wondering...
Connally was shot in leg..
Did the bullet go through the door?
 

Just wondering....

Didn't Connally say there was one shooter and it was Oswald?

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:35 pm

And why did he turn around,?

Cause Kennedy was just shot 

Are you saying doctors lied ?

 Wondering...
Connally was shot in leg..
Did the bullet go through the door?

he was turning to look at kennedy.

And don't forget..

Doctor said Connally had an entrance room....
....
In his back

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:38 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:38 pm

Just wondering....

Didn't Connally say there was one shooter and it was Oswald?

he said there were 3 shots and all the shots hit them, kennedy twice,his self once. that was all he knew.  he did not even know about oswald until he got out of the hospital weeks later and after oswald was shot.

HarperLee » 07 Apr 2025, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:42 pm

And don't forget..

Doctor said Connally had an entrance room....
....
In his back

which was facing the left of the road when he got shot.

watch the video.

jerrab » 07 Apr 2025, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Apr 2025, 4:44 pm

which was facing the left of the road when he got shot.

watch the video.

You can't be serious...

There simply was no way he was shot in the back while sitting in the front seat 
Unless the bullet came from the back

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBJFT-OyDEc