RebelGator » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Working Americans, by definition, aren't part of those programs......I suspect a hard day's work and a piece of *** would kill you.
What are the sources of ignorance and stupidity? Intellectual minds believing ideas are larger than a brain navigating time adapting to the moment here since conceived to replace one's own previous 4 generation gaps lived so far.Vegas » Yesterday, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Many dims around the country can't find enough tampons to plug up their menstruating/manstratuating holes about DOGE. I don't get that. There is no legitimate explanation to be against preventing waste. I don't know of a company in the country who doesn't try to cut useless spending. It's just part of every system. Hell, we even do that in our private lives. If I see my bank account is bleeding in a manner that shouldn't be, then I go back and see why. Maybe there are some apps that I forgot to cancel. Maybe I was overpaying on a particular insurance. Maybe I got the wrong plan for a piece of software that I should have used a cheaper plan...etc. I'll go into my garage in see a bunch of **** that I haven't used in years. So I throw it out.
We finally have a department in the government that does this when it has been long overdue.
So help me out. Are these people just stupid or is it TDS?
Vegas » Yesterday, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Many dims around the country can't find enough tampons to plug up their menstruating/manstratuating holes about DOGE. I don't get that. There is no legitimate explanation to be against preventing waste. I don't know of a company in the country who doesn't try to cut useless spending. It's just part of every system. Hell, we even do that in our private lives. If I see my bank account is bleeding in a manner that shouldn't be, then I go back and see why. Maybe there are some apps that I forgot to cancel. Maybe I was overpaying on a particular insurance. Maybe I got the wrong plan for a piece of software that I should have used a cheaper plan...etc. I'll go into my garage in see a bunch of **** that I haven't used in years. So I throw it out.
We finally have a department in the government that does this when it has been long overdue.
So help me out. Are these people just stupid or is it TDS?
31stArrival » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What are the sources of ignorance and stupidity? Intellectual minds believing ideas are larger than a brain navigating time adapting to the moment here since conceived to replace one's own previous 4 generation gaps lived so far.
where do the concepts of exceptional and exempt come from? Ignoring their biological position adapting since displaced ancestrally here so far.
Who you chose to become after birth doesn't change all you been since a fertilized cell.Johnny You » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Phoolks can make an empire studying the Science of Stupid.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oboh49QRQX8
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 6:41 pm » wrote: ↑ You're not gonna make a point, then. Telling me that DOGE hurt farmers without any explanation for the claim doesn't answer the challenge. Nor do the naked words, "cancer research."
Is this^ an implied challenge for me to name a few cuts that inarguably make sense? Is that how I should take it? Say it. No, no - SAY it. I dare ya to say it.
How quickly? What harm was done? Anything irreversible? Anything I should actually care about, out of decency? Say more about those.
If we wanted delicacy, we already had it. Obama promised to cut waste - and he did it so delicately, it was as if he didn't do it at all. To QUOTE that worthy, "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good." You say you're cool with someone doing something about waste and fraud - you're just not cool with how THESE guys are doing it.
Okay.
Who did it right, then - in your mind? Whose method SHOULD we be using? SHOW us the perfect, before you ask us to practice enmity against the good.
Unless you can tell us at least a WEE more specifically how it OUGHT to be done, we will continue to celebrate that it IS being done, and let the devil take the hindmost.
Calm down, dude. I support DOGE 100%. I just didn't see the point of going after such a trivial agency that isn't even all that wasteful. They should spend targeting the big fish, so we will see an actual difference.*Beekeeper » Today, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑ It was a 10% CUT in an overly bloated agency. And that in YOUR mind seems to be some disaster??
Did they ALSO tell you that another 3,000 SEASONAL workers are going to be hired? Or did you conveniently leave out that part in order to make some pointless point?
$36 TRILLION and growing. Try to explain your plans to REDUCE THAT AMOUNT!!
GO!!
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:57 pm » wrote: ↑ You think Gaza Buster bombs are free? SOMETHING'S gotta give.
Why are you an anti-Semite? Show us on the doll where the jew touched you, hitler.
![]()
![]()
Okay, you named a program. I have to admit, I haven't been paying attention.
Apparently you have. So tell me - what cuts have been made to the park services? Cuz I agree - that's a suck *** thing to cut. They're advertising no more condoms for tanzania, and delivering no more rangers for jellystone? Sounds like Trump's usual ****, alright.
same **** different definitions or the exact same behavioral patterns by every alternate reality defined by rule of law within this species existing within 5 ancestral lineages (black brown, yellow, red, white) 5 generation gaps numbering 16 great great grandparents and siblings, 8 great grandparents and siblings, 4 grandparents and siblings, 2 parenting and siblings and cousins, each great great grandchild changing population left alive daily one at a time.Mrkelly » Today, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑you always do this kind of ****
”whose method should we be using”![]()
you even threw an Obomba in for good measure![]()
like I am some undercover democrat![]()
I would like to see them do it more methodically
I like to bitch about ****
and that bothers you
and I am OK with that
see how it works?
How is it that you think Trump is taking a "chainsaw approach" when even with the hundreds of billions he and Musk have been saving, it still amounts to less that 1% of government spending?Mrkelly » Yesterday, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Farmers come to mind, that made a living from feeding people from all over the world
hungry kids that didn’t anything wrong, except to have worthless parents
cancer research
Im not gonna chase sad stories to make a point
I would have liked to see them make the cuts that make sense
they have already walked back some that they didn’t realize would **** with the American people
not a fan of the chainsaw approach when it come to **** with peoples lives
just sayin
Hey, I voted for Obama twice, so don't be readin' shame game into my argument. Like I said - one of his better lines was don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. I also defended - and still stand ready to defend - his "you didn't build that" argument.Mrkelly » Today, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑you always do this kind of ****
”whose method should we be using”![]()
you even threw an Obomba in for good measure![]()
like I am some undercover democrat![]()
I would like to see them do it more methodically
I like to bitch about ****
and that bothers you
and I am OK with that
see how it works?