Then don't drag everyone else down to your 0.16 Level, narcissist.Vegas » 23 Mar 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ I never claimed my titles were you dumb mother ****.
Your idea of refuting anyone's content is "You are a **** idiot."
Now shut up.
Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Then don't drag everyone else down to your 0.16 Level, narcissist.
Already done.Vegas » 23 Mar 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑ MOST of my content are my own thoughts. You can't refute them.
Vegheads level 2+ refutation: "You are a **** idiot."
Answer coward!Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ I don't answer questions the first time , because I have serious control issues.
Hey Veghead, since I already proved yesterday—in real time—that you repeat yourself like a broken toy with a dying battery, would you like me to continue today?
I mean, I didn’t even have to dig into your ancient post history. You gave me all the evidence I needed just by being your usual predictable self... in a single afternoon.
You don't read posts...Vegas » 23 Mar 2025, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ I would love to ask you how, but you don't answer questions the first time, so **** that.
Besides, I already know how. You said "you are a **** idiot." That was how.
Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2025, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Wouldn't this DEFINE "meltdown", 43MilesShortNoCars?
You're lying.Vegas » 23 Mar 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Hides again. I don't read copy/pasted internet ****. I read member's intelligent thoughts. You have none to read.
1. Hide, like always.
Two objective facts.*Huey » 23 Mar 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Nope. It is defined as facts. Not sure what the last part of your sentence is trying to convey. It like fictional gibberish to me.
You literally just proved me right. I said you post the same ****, and here you go, just posted the same ****.
But that is the most blatant example of projection on the innertubes....along with several posts of @*HooooeyVagina'sVegas » 23 Mar 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ You literally just proved me right. I said you post the same ****, and here you go, just posted the same ****.
Ok everybody else here. Let this sink in. He is proving that I am lying, by proving that I am right. Let that sink in.
Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ But that is the most blatant example of projection on the innertubes....along with several posts of @*HooooeyVagina's
5. Mistake vs Lie/ Prove you answered it the first time/ "not a penny" LIE LIE LIE!
I'd be happy to continue to prove your redundancy if you would like.Blackvegetable » 23 Mar 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑ Vegas just handed me my *** again...not that it's hard.
Figured "42" would trigger a meltdown..*Huey » 23 Mar 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑ I see the number 43 but I am not sure what it means. It ,eans nothing to me. Are you trying to write about Richard Petty?
Can you prove you aren't a moron?Vegas » 23 Mar 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ I'd be happy to continue to prove your redundancy if you would like.
You proved you're a moron 100k+1 times..Vegas » 23 Mar 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
You just did it again. You have posted this ^^^ 100k times already.
You dumb mother ****. You dumb dumb dumb mother ****.
Can you prove you aren't a dick sucking child molesting *** queer?