I bet you'd love you some tranny meat, wouldn't you? Along with all the "free" stuff you can steal!Mrkelly » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ JD pisses off both sides with the truth
he is a gem
that is why I voted for him last year
I bet you'd love you some tranny meat, wouldn't you, mr queerly? Along with all the "free" stuff you can pilfer.Mrkelly » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ JD pisses off both sides with the truth
he is a gem
that is why I voted for him last year
*Beekeeper » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Where is the EVIDENCE??
Dore bloviating without ANY EVIDENCE is hardly worthy of whining about anything. He's RARELY BEEN RIGHT ABOUT MUCH OF ANYTHING!!
And as a FYI, and ENTITLEMENT has nothing to do with paying into it, but everything to do with QUALIFIYING UNDER THE PROGRAM!!
You may bot be ENTITLED to FOOD STAMPS, but you PAID FOR THEM!!
Try not to be so **** STUPID for a change.
Mrkelly » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Goofy ****
this is about social security![]()
just for **** and giggles
show me a time that Dore was wrong
I agree, the cap is ridiculous...jerrab » Today, 3:27 am » wrote: ↑ raise the freaking cap of how much money can be taxed for social security, right now it is 187,000 anything OVER THAT DOES NOT GET TAXED FOR SOCIAL SECURITY. plus the rich get lot more in social security.
raise the cap, not cut back benefits-which would the poor peoples benefits I am sure- don't raise the retirement age--- RAISE THE CAP!!!!
He just made it funny...DeezerShoove » Today, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑ POTD approved but I still think Carlin was an asshole bitch most of the time.
He "predicted" this while a thousand other people said the same thing.
Fuelman » Today, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Curious how much your Social Security benefit was cut so I can be prepared when they cut mine.
9 years, which is in line with your average expiration date...Fuelman » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ $467,426
That is how much our (wife and I) labor has paid into SS over the last 45 years. Add another $113k for Medicare. That could have turned into one hell of a retirement account. The problem is, it's not a retirement account, it's a welfare program and there is no guarantee. The sooner you realize this the better off you will be.
The Wife turns 62 next January, I collected at 62 three years ago. Our combined benefit will be $52k a year. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out how long before we get our money back. After that, it's the ultimate gravy train for a millionaire household.
Raising the cap will only give those high earners a larger benefit unless something else is written into the law.
I don't have the answers but something needs to change.
Fuelman » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I probably should have already died, too many close calls within seconds of being in the wrong place at the right time.
The average is a little longer than 9 years:
On average, a person in the United States who is 62 years old can expect to live for around 20.8 years, with men living to an average of 83.6 years and women to 86 years.
I've always thought that the cap was ridiculous...jerrab » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ wow you agree, I am shocked.
energize all the young people you know. they are very concerned about social security running out.
I would like to see lift the cap rallies in dc.
In the end all that does is give high earners a larger SS check.
That will be one hell of a debate to determine what that number is!!!ROG62 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I believe accrued wealth should have a bearing on collecting SSI...
ROG62 » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I've always thought that the cap was ridiculous...
two problems here...
I believe accrued wealth should have a bearing on collecting SSI...
Congress should never have been allowed access into SSI's coffers to use as a slush fund...
Fuelman » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In the end all that does is give high earners a larger SS check.
I agree it could be a quick fix short term but not actually a solution long term.
----------------------------------------------Fuelman » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ In the end all that does is give high earners a larger SS check.
I agree it could be a quick fix short term but not actually a solution long term.