Liberal Forum

Skans » 26 Mar 2025, 7:28 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 7:28 am

 YOU are taking my money.  YOU and YOUR ELECTED OFFICIALS going all the way back to Post WWII, have stolen the money of America's youth. 


 

Thank you for your service.  
 

Skans » 26 Mar 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 7:48 am

Good!  Cuz, it's a comming.  The American youth won't stand for it.  I'll make sure it is the key issue of the next election.  ELIMINATE SOCIAL SECURITY.
 

your intellectual social consensus's downfall has arrived before that next election cycle arrives. Change your mind because your brain isn't working as naturally displaced as your mind belongs to those nurturing it after birth.

Skans » 26 Mar 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 8:04 am

Here's what I know as a 100% fact:
1. There is no social security fund - hasn't been one in decades.
2. The Social Security Ponzi-Scam will not last forever.  It WILL come crashing down and be discontinued.  I can't tell you "when", but I can tell you this will happen.
3. Boomers are dying off.  GenX'ers are the lost generation because their numbers are smallest of all the Gen's. Millennials will be in for the fight on this.  They matter because they have the numbers.

Social Security is coming down.  If you stopped thinking with your every-growing, ever-hungry gut for 5 minutes, you'd realize this is the right thing - it needs to go away.

I'm not sure you pansy youngin's want that fight with GenX. FAFO  
 

Skans » 26 Mar 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 8:08 am

First question:  Do you really believe Social Security will last forever?

Second question: When the Millenials wise up, do you think these sloths who lived in mommy and daddy's basement until age 30, who finally become productive in their late 30's, are going to want to pay mommy and daddy's (2 people they resent the most) Social Security?

My kids 1 millennial and 1 Gen Z don't resent me. Maybe you should treat your kids better, who the **** is gonna change your diaper?  

Skans » 26 Mar 2025, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 8:10 am

Translation:  Democrat wants his social security, but wants to deny others theirs. 

This is one more reason why social in-security must be ended immediately.

denying people who get more than 90,000 a month........

Cedar » 26 Mar 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 9:49 am

GenX is coming up on retirement, good luck with that.

GenX have done better than Boomers, and certainly better than Millennials. I bet most GenX'ers are sick and tired of paying into Social Security.
 

Cedar » 26 Mar 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 10:08 am

My kids 1 millennial and 1 Gen Z don't resent me. Maybe you should treat your kids better, who the **** is gonna change your diaper?

I told the kid, when it's my time, and God willing, I'm going to go on the longest hike of my life out in the woods. I'll get that heart pounding real good 'till it just explodes. Let the Coyotes gnaw on my gristly bones for awhile.
 

jerrab » 26 Mar 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 10:31 am

denying people who get more than 90,000 a month........

Hey, boy, it ain't none of your business what someone else makes.  You Democrats can't ever mind your own.  Always got your noses in somebody else's business and your grubby hands in their pockets. 
 

Skans » 26 Mar 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 11:22 am

Hey, boy, it ain't none of your business what someone else makes.  You Democrats can't ever mind your own.  Always got your noses in somebody else's business and your grubby hands in their pockets.

it is not my concern what you think.

jerra b » 26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm

it is not my concern what you think.

You make everything you believe true my concern with every idea you obey in the faith life isn't self evident time simply equally adapting in the moment here.

You won't accept your body only exists limited to adapting in space as many rotations that happen between fertilized cell and decomposed corpse.

Every society built to save humanity tomorrow each society commands by rule of law noon to midnight who my character should be midnight to noon every dawn to dusk part of each rotation of the planet I am alive. I cannot be honest about what I have been since conceived or be charged with insubordination, treason, blasphemy against humanity.

Skans » 25 Mar 2025, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Mar 2025, 3:08 pm

Look, Boomers.  Your social security is gone.  Your elected officials and their appointed staffers spent it all decades ago.  You're problem, not the younger generation's problem.

If you spent all your money on Fruitcakes, Ponzi Scams and Blow how is that anyone else's problem?  You F-ed around, now you're just going to starve. Die a little earlier than you may have planned.  I don't see the problem.

So, Boomers, I'm cutting y'all off.  Butch-up and get back to work...... or starve.  No more Social Security Ponzi Scam. Y'all are CUT OFF!!!

The majority of ppl take more out of SS than what they contributed. So while there is truth to your statement (“there is no SS fund”), I don’t find it as problematic as you do. 

FOS also doesn’t seem to care about this issue even though he will probably pay way more into the system than he gets out. (Then again he said many times money is a minor priority, which is the appropos mindset)

——————-

Let me also address an issue by the financially illiterate crowd (not you per se, just the masses):

The “if I just put my money into the stock market and let it grow instead of paying taxes for SS, I’d have way more” argument also doesn’t apply for the next 10-15 years when the SP 500 will look like the Japanese index from 1989-2009 and we revisit 1000-1500 price levels.

Enjoy the 80 - 85% decline over many years.

People will be BEGGING for Social Security back once their 401Ks are completely eviscerated, even if your looney suggestion is somehow implemented.

@Cannonpointer  
 

LowIQTrash » 26 Mar 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 1:17 pm

The majority of ppl take more out of SS than they contributed. So while there is truth to your statement (“there is no SS fund”), I don’t find it as problematic as you do.

 

What is the largest misnomer about your statement? Only those that survive into retirement get it except handicapped children and children of unwed mothers for which the SSI program wasn't setup to fund in the first place.

that American Disabilities Act in the 90's under Clinton really screwed it up as the final nail in its failure.

jerrab » 26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 1:03 pm

it is not my concern what you think.

Yeah it is, or you wouldn't be here yapp'n with me.
 

Cedar » 26 Mar 2025, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 9:53 am

I got enough that I'd hardly notice $30K less a year.

if there was an income limit for social security there could be a reduction of federal taxes for those whose income would be over the limit.

jerrab » 26 Mar 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 2:20 pm

if there was an income limit for social security there could be a reduction of federal taxes for those whose income would be over the limit.

I can assure you, I  would fall below that limit, my current income less SSI is below the poverty line. Good thing I didn't piss away my money partying and keeping up with the Joneses my whole life.   
 

Cedar » 26 Mar 2025, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 2:29 pm

I can assure you, I  would fall below that limit, my current income less SSI is below the poverty line. Good thing I didn't piss away my money partying and keeping up with the Joneses my whole life. 

the limit would be very high, at least 700,000 dollars a year. maybe more.

LowIQTrash » 26 Mar 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 1:17 pm

The majority of ppl take more out of SS than what they contributed. So while there is truth to your statement (“there is no SS fund”), I don’t find it as problematic as you do. 

FOS also doesn’t seem to care about this issue even though he will probably pay way more into the system than he gets out. (Then again he said many times money is a minor priority, which is the appropos mindset)

——————-

Let me also address an issue by the financially illiterate crowd (not you per se, just the masses):

The “if I just put my money into the stock market and let it grow instead of paying taxes for SS, I’d have way more” argument also doesn’t apply for the next 10-15 years when the SP 500 will look like the Japanese index from 1989-2009 and we revisit 1000-1500 price levels.

Enjoy the 80 - 85% decline over many years.

People will be BEGGING for Social Security back once their 401Ks are completely eviscerated, even if your looney suggestion is somehow implemented.

@Cannonpointer

Skans STANDS BY the accounting firms that erased an entire generation's retirement accounts - while scoffing at foreigner accountants like a good neocon cartoon murkan. 

Skans is the quintessential "ugly american" - unless he never travels overseas. Then he's just a regular american neocon.

jerra b » 26 Mar 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑

26 Mar 2025, 2:20 pm

if there was an income limit for social security there could be a reduction of federal taxes for those whose income would be over the limit.

Evolving works by zero sum gain changes adapting while displaced conceived into a generation gap and dead to decomposed corpse. the mean time cradle to grave rule of law demands everyone stay in contextual character daily or else.

the only thing humanity ever secures since dawn of civilization is reasonable doubt now cannot be eternity forward teaching each great great grandchild to honor the ideas held by previous 4 generation gaps combined.

SSDD. Genetics eternally separates every reproduction native to this atmosphere and humanity corrupts every ancestor born into this species daily by choices made and promises kept every generation gap living now.

Stay on message thinking outside one's time simply adapting to the moment here governed by clocks and calendars managing every decision cradle to grave repeat history over and over expecting better days tomorrow midnight to noon dawn to dusk.

what was that question, Why can't everyone just get along? here is the specific reason.

31stArrival » Yesterday, 4:02 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:02 am

Evolving works by zero sum gain changes adapting while displaced conceived into a generation gap and dead to decomposed corpse. the mean time cradle to grave rule of law demands everyone stay in contextual character daily or else.

the only thing humanity ever secures since dawn of civilization is reasonable doubt now cannot be eternity forward teaching each great great grandchild to honor the ideas held by previous 4 generation gaps combined.

SSDD.

Reasonable Doubt is the Curse of an Engineer.  Measure a 1000 times, cut once.

Doubt is a mechanism of survival.
 

Johnny You » Yesterday, 4:07 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:07 am

Reasonable Doubt is the Curse of an Engineer.  Measure a 1000 times, cut once.

Doubt is a mechanism of survival.
 

Look at you avoid self evident time existing one of a kind equally inhabiting space as genetically here proportionately alive, one of a kind equally timed apart, evolving in series parallel position since conception.

I could be like Murdock and tell you to go **** yourself but I find it more civil to show where corruption comes from, than join in staying corrupted cradle to grave.

I leave you with free will and what people have done throughout history since dawn of denying now is eternity. I have spent 18 years explaining why people won't just get along and nobody wants to know where humanity gets away with corrupting every great great grandchild born each rotation here.