And I am like one of the few who will take the time to understand your philosophy. I get it.31stArrival » Yesterday, 4:10 am » wrote: ↑ Look at you avoid self evident time existing one of a kind equally inhabiting space as genetically here proportionately alive, one of a kind equally timed apart, evolving in series parallel position since conception.
I could be like Murdock and tell you to go **** yourself but I find it more civil to show where corruption comes from, than join in staying corrupted cradle to grave.
I leave you with free will and what people have done throughout history since dawn of denying now is eternity. I have spent 18 years explaining why people won't just get along and nobody wants to know where humanity gets away with corrupting every great great grandchild born each rotation here.
You denier of self evident displacement. You defend character matters not correcting self deception encouraged by every alternate reality on the world stage commanding people to defend their ancestral typecast protecting the stereotypical role playing practiced within your own ancestral lineage.Johnny You » Yesterday, 4:21 am » wrote: ↑ And I am like one of the few who will take the time to understand your philosophy. I get it.
One guy was showing me his hand and the tape worm in it. He asked "Can't you see the eyes and the mouth" as he pointed at some bumps on the back of hand. I said I am not sure if tape worms have eyes and teeth and it just looks like some bumps on your skin to me.
In several years, ALL social security payments get automatically cut 20% if Congress does nothing. Congress is good at doing nothing.
I thought you conservatives WANTED Congress to “do less.”Skans » Yesterday, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ In several years, ALL social security payments get automatically cut 20% if Congress does nothing. Congress is good at doing nothing.
I want Congress to Slash-And-Burn government. That includes Social Security. So, if doing nothing gets it cut 20%, then so be it - at least its a start.LowIQTrash » Yesterday, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ I thought you conservatives WANTED Congress to “do less.”
Whatever “reforms” they propose would probably only make you more irate than you already are. So this is the best practical outcome (for you at least).
Go to any Social Security Office on the country and the only people in it are too young to collect retirement benefits.Skans » Yesterday, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ I want Congress to Slash-And-Burn government. That includes Social Security. So, if doing nothing gets it cut 20%, then so be it - at least its a start.
Never been to one. I'm not surprised. It's not old people sucking the Social Security dry.RebelGator » Yesterday, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑ Go to any Social Security Office on the country and the only people in it are too young to collect retirement benefits.
Good luck getting that through Congress. You're such a *******.Skans » 25 Mar 2025, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Look, Boomers. Your social security is gone. Your elected officials and their appointed staffers spent it all decades ago. You're problem, not the younger generation's problem.
If you spent all your money on Fruitcakes, Ponzi Scams and Blow how is that anyone else's problem? You F-ed around, now you're just going to starve. Die a little earlier than you may have planned. I don't see the problem.
So, Boomers, I'm cutting y'all off. Butch-up and get back to work...... or starve. No more Social Security Ponzi Scam. Y'all are CUT OFF!!!
Skans just knows which buttons to push to get a thread rolling.ConsRule » Yesterday, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Good luck getting that through Congress. You're such a *******.
I don't need to. There will be an AUTOMATIC 20% REDUCTION OF ALL SOCIAL SECURITY PAYMENTS in a few years, if Congress doesn't fix it. A U T O M A T I CConsRule » Yesterday, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Good luck getting that through Congress. You're such a *******.
Except for these poor bastards:LowIQTrash » 26 Mar 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The majority of ppl take more out of SS than what they contributed. So while there is truth to your statement (“there is no SS fund”), I don’t find it as problematic as you do.
FOS also doesn’t seem to care about this issue even though he will probably pay way more into the system than he gets out. (Then again he said many times money is a minor priority, which is the appropos mindset)
——————-
Let me also address an issue by the financially illiterate crowd (not you per se, just the masses):
The “if I just put my money into the stock market and let it grow instead of paying taxes for SS, I’d have way more” argument also doesn’t apply for the next 10-15 years when the SP 500 will look like the Japanese index from 1989-2009 and we revisit 1000-1500 price levels.
Enjoy the 80 - 85% decline over many years.
People will be BEGGING for Social Security back once their 401Ks are completely eviscerated, even if your looney suggestion is somehow implemented.
@Cannonpointer
I'd rather have that than rKelly living in Section 8 housing and eating free groceries for my tax dollars.Sumela » Yesterday, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Lets double the WAR DEPT welfare...
so they can practice losing another trillion$.
While I'm good with killing Houthis, I think we can torch them on 25% of our current military budget.Sumela » Yesterday, 12:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Lets double the WAR DEPT welfare...
so they can practice losing another trillion$.
Nope. Saudis failed. UAE failed. Biden failed. "we" cannot.Skans » Yesterday, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ While I'm good with killing Houthis, I think we can torch them on 25% of our current military budget.
Yup yer a big govt boi....RebelGator » Yesterday, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I'd rather have that than rKelly living in Section 8 housing and eating free groceries for my tax dollars.