There's no "Game, Set, Match" when you run from the facts.*Huey » 26 Mar 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ 1. You were asked to meet in Boston.
2. At the time I was there you had no clue where I was staying.
Game..Set..Match..you lose. You are among the most dishonest posters I have ever encountered in almost 25 years of posting.
It is over. You refuse to answer questions, you refuse to acknowledge facts, and you got caught lying.Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2025, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑ There's no "Game, Set, Match" when you run from the facts.
*Huey » 26 Mar 2025, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑ It is over. You refuse to answer questions, you refuse to acknowledge facts, and you got caught lying.
You lose. All you had to d was answer two questions. And you ran.
:rofl:You refuse to answer questions
Here is the problem. The question I asked you has been answered plenty of times PLUS I was the one who posted the information originally. Below are the questions you have never answered:
The only "problem" is your unwillingness to acknowledge the objective fact.*Huey » 26 Mar 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is the problem. The question I asked you has been answered plenty of times PLUS I was the one who posted the information originally. Below are the questions you have never answered:
1. Where were you asked to meet me?
2. When do you actually find it out where I stayed and why? After that we can continue. If not I will answer and you will accept your L
What century after 1200 AD was Canada named by humanity?
I have acknowledged the objective fact of where I stayed. I posted it.Blackvegetable » 26 Mar 2025, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ The only "problem" is your unwillingness to acknowledge the objective fact.