Liberal Forum

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Mary, there is no context, real or imagined, where you can put me in a world of hurt.

As far as questions, I am done with your questions for today.  YOU need start making your point.  I am not going to do it for you.

Here is the deal.  I voted for and supported a reduction of the federal work force.  Today I support a reduction of the federal work force.  You, not so much.  Maybe you have a good reason.  Asking questions doesn't answer.

Don't run, Twatty.

Stand behind your words....as a Man should


 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Don't run, Twatty.

Stand behind your words....as a Man should

I am.  Waiting for you to post your words to stand behind, as a Man should.  I have done my part.  Your turn .  You are proving you are not a man.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I am.  Waiting for you to post your words to stand behind, as a Man should.  I have done my part.  Your turn .  You are proving you are not a man.

No, lying little ****..

You run from everything including your own words.

Mary, there is no context, real or imagined, where you can put me in a world of hurt. .

Every context, every day, Runny

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

No, lying little ****..

You run from everything including your own words.

Every context, every day, Runny

Mary, I have posted my position.  I have done what you claimed a man should.  It is your turn to post yours.  And then tell us why 30 years ago you were all for it and now you aren't.

I guess it has to do with the parties involved, NoIntegrity.

*Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Mary, I have posted my position.  I have done what you claimed a man should.  It is your turn to post yours.  And then tell us why 30 years ago you were all for it and now you aren't.

I guess it has to do with the parties involved, NoIntegrity.

You've run from your own words and the questions they raise.

It's what you do...
It's why your dad named you Sheilagh. 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You've run from your own words and the questions they raise.

It's what you do...
It's why your dad named you Sheilagh.

Projection.

Hey Veghead, serious question - Looks like we’re heading into another day of classic Veghead—same posts, same recycled lines, same desperate attempts to sound clever. The redundancy pile’s starting to block out the sun at this point. So tell us, are you finally planning to break the cycle, or should I keep the daily documentation going?

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You've run from your own words and the questions they raise.

It's what you do...
It's why your dad named you Sheilagh.

And here come ST!

No Mary, my dad did not name me that.  He is of German Descent.  

What else ya got?  Do you have your words for you to stand behind concerning why 30 years ago you were all for stopping fraud, waste and abuse and government efficiency and now you are not? 

 

Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

You'll have to clue us in....I wear mine to  cut wood

me? na, I'll leave that up to 'experts' like you...

so you're a lumberjack now? Is this your themesong?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FshU58nI0Ts

 
 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

And here come ST!

No Mary, my dad did not name me that.  He is of German Descent.  

What else ya got?  Do you have your words for you to stand behind concerning why 30 years ago you were all for stopping fraud, waste and abuse and government efficiency and now you are not?

Do you have your words for you to stand behind concerning why 30 years ago you were all for stopping fraud, waste and abuse and government efficiency and now you are not? 

You haven't posted these alleged words of mine from 30 years ago.

You haven't posted any of my words opposing "stopping waste, fraud and abuse and government efficiency".

But I've posted YOUR words.

Verbatim.

ROG62 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

me? na, I'll leave that up to 'experts' like you...

so you're a lumberjack now? Is this your themesong?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FshU58nI0Ts

Were you the dullest student at your Christian JuCo?

Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Projection.

Hey Veghead, serious question - Looks like we’re heading into another day of classic Veghead—same posts, same recycled lines, same desperate attempts to sound clever. The redundancy pile’s starting to block out the sun at this point. So tell us, are you finally planning to break the cycle, or should I keep the daily documentation going?

Post the rule.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Post the rule.

More evidence that you say/do the same posts, day after day. 

Of course you want a rule now—every time you're asked a basic question, you act like someone just violated international law. Here's your rule,

Veghead: if you post an OP, you answer the damn questions about it. No evasions, no copy-paste, no playing debate referee while refusing to step in the ring. Simple enough, or should I draw it in crayon?

Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

More evidence that you say/do the same posts, day after day. 

Of course you want a rule now—every time you're asked a basic question, you act like someone just violated international law. Here's your rule,

How can we be certain that it isn't a rule?

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

How can we be certain that it isn't a rule?

Oh man, Veghead's back with his favorite move—hiding behind smug questions instead of answering anything, like some kind of budget philosopher with a broken compass.


Watch how easy you are: 
1. You will now hide behind the question "do the rules apply to you?" 

So god damn **** stupid.

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Oh man, Veghead's back with his favorite move—hiding behind smug questions instead of answering anything, like some kind of budget philosopher with a broken compass.

Watch how easy you are: 
1. You will now hide behind the question "do the rules apply to you?" 

So god damn **** stupid.

You didn't answer the question. 

Do you not understand why that isn't a rule?
 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You didn't answer the question. 

Do you not understand why that isn't a rule?

Here’s the difference, Veghead—you’re the one who posted the OP. That makes it your argument, your claim, and your responsibility to defend it. Nobody has to answer your questions until you do the one thing you consistently avoid: stand by your own words. This isn’t a Q&A session where you get to dodge criticism and pretend you’re in charge.


You want answers? Earn them—start by actually defending what you post instead of turning every thread into your personal dodgeball game.

Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

You haven't posted these alleged words of mine from 30 years ago.

You haven't posted any of my words opposing "stopping waste, fraud and abuse and government efficiency".

But I've posted YOUR words.

Verbatim.

Post them now.  I did.  What are you afraid of?  Why is it you NEVER take a stand? Oh well Options, I guess you will bless than man your entire life

Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

Were you the dullest student at your Christian JuCo?

me? na, I'll leave that up to 'experts' like you...

so you're a lumberjack now? Is this your themesong?


↓https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FshU58nI0Ts
 

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Post them now.  I did.  What are you afraid of?  Why is it you NEVER take a stand? Oh well Options, I guess you will bless than man your entire life

I did.

Tiny, 

First you have to explain what you mean by "30 years ago".

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Tiny, 

First you have to explain what you mean by "30 years ago".

You are the math whiz.  Do it yourself.  And I see you wish to exact. Where you will go on a three page rant.

Go with this.  I the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it.  Today, I support it.  

Why about you?