I thought you accused Clinton of "decimating the military"?*Huey » Today, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the math whiz. Do it yourself. And I see you wish to exact. Where you will go on a three page rant.
Go with this. I the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
Why about you?
Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I thought you accused Clinton of "decimating the military"?
Isn't that the debate you claimed to have won earlier?
How so?*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Looks like I won that debate. BV is is diverting.
I guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government.
Run, Options Boy, Run.
literally and inarguably did so.guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑How so?*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Looks like I won that debate. BV is is diverting.
I guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government.
Run, Options Boy, Run.
How many "decimations" in a 25% reduction ?literally and inarguably did so.guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government
*Huey » Today, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » Today, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
First you have to explain what you mean by "30 years ago".
You are the math whiz. Do it yourself. And I see you wish to exact. Where you will go on a three page rant.
Go with this. In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
Why are you running and reframing, options? **** ******! ;)In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
Tiny,
Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Tiny,
You are running from your own lies.
Again.
It's what you do.
Let's try this again. After you return to the current discussion, Options, we can address your diversion.*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑How so?*Huey » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Looks like I won that debate. BV is is diverting.
I guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government.
Run, Options Boy, Run.
How many "decimations" in a 25% reduction ?literally and inarguably did so.guess he will never explain his position on cutting fraud waste and abuse in government
*Huey » Today, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » Today, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
First you have to explain what you mean by "30 years ago".
You are the math whiz. Do it yourself. And I see you wish to exact. Where you will go on a three page rant.
Go with this. In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
Why are you running and reframing, options? **** ******! ;)In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
*Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Let's try this again. After you return to the current discussion, Options, we can address your diversion.
You know where to find me, "All talk no Action". Will you bring a dumbbell, Cat Stuben?
I do stand by my words, All Talk No Action. Before we get to your diversion where I will curb stomp the **** out of your we have to clear up the current discussion:Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Let's try this again. After you return to the current discussion, Options, we can address your diversion.
You know where to find me, "All talk no Action". Will you bring a dumbbell, Cat Stuben?
Yes, I'll find you yapping.....lying.....huddling.....anything but standing by your words.
Why ar you such a ******? Bring your daughter in so the bitch can see what a ****** her dad is.*Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Tiny,
You are running from your own lies.
Again.
It's what you do.
Let's try this again. After you return to the current discussion, Options, we can address your diversion.*Huey » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
How so?
How many "decimations" in a 25% reduction ?
literally and inarguably did so.
*Huey » Today, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑
You are the math whiz. Do it yourself. And I see you wish to exact. Where you will go on a three page rant.
Go with this. In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
Why are you running and reframing, options? **** ******! ;)In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it. Today, I support it.
What about you?
You know where to find me, "All talk no Action". Will you bring a dumbbell, Cat Stuben?
ANOITHER "question" to AVOID ANSWERING A QUESTION, DIKSUKM??