Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Whom are you addressing?

       The fact that he doesn't know only gives more evidence that he is a hopeless narcissist.         

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:54 am

It doesn't get worse than worse than Buchanan. 

Now answer the question.

it does..."worse than jimmy..."
 

ROG62 » Today, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:46 pm

it does..."worse than jimmy..."

no...look at the list...

Your feefees are irrelevant. 

Vegas » Today, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:00 pm

       The fact that he doesn't know only gives more evidence that he is a hopeless narcissist.       

Is there a crowd following you around?

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:07 pm

Is there a crowd following you around?

My God man. You seriously cannot stop hiding. Questions after questions after questions after questions.....

I bet if I go back on thread, I would find the following:

Number of questions/demands from Veghead = 57
Number of answers from Veghead when asked the first time = 0. 

1. More hiding...and more hiding after that.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:07 pm

no...look at the list...

Your feefees are irrelevant.

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15
• Independents/Others – 44
• Liberals – 98
• Conservatives – 20
• Moderates – 36
• **** YOU

https://presidentialgreatnessproject.com/

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:53 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:53 pm

You ran from the questions, Punkass..

you're the one constantly talking smack at a considerable distance.

Always yapping about "doing your own work"....

I didn’t run from questions ******. 

When I talk smack it is not from a position of anonymity.  You have my name, my address, my pic, my address, directions to my house and a pic of my house. You leave that part out every time, ****** Boy.

I was also less than 33 miles from your punk *** after years of your threats, ****** boy.  You hid in bed with your binky.  

I am grateful you did not sire a male child.  It would have been another Low T beta male ****** Boy.

Blackvegetable » 29 Mar 2025, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑

29 Mar 2025, 6:23 am

Judge Settle also called out the Trump administration for seemingly disregarding the service history of the transgender soldiers who brought the case, such as the Commander Emily Shilling, a naval aviator with 19 years of service who flew 60 combat missions before becoming a Navy test pilot.

"There is no claim and no evidence that she is now, or ever was, a detriment to her unit's cohesion, or to the military's lethality or readiness, or that she is mentally or physically unable to continue her service," Settle wrote.

"There is no claim and no evidence that Shilling herself is dishonest or selfish, or that she lacks humility or integrity. Yet absent an injunction, she will be promptly discharged solely because she is transgender," wrote the judge.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/unfair-exclus ... =120255260

Don't presume to tell this legionnaire about "unit cohesion"


 
https://youtu.be/P101y5A8xAk?si=5H5B462VHKjH9ezb

And JUST LIKE THAT, the "party of science" wants to go in FULL DENIAL that SCIENCE SAYS that NO MAN can become a "woman" simply by "wishing away male DNA". 

Still, NOTHING worthy of spending any time reading. ALWAYS the same **** from the FORUM IDIOT!!

So BeeVee, define a WOMAN for us. Again. And then tell us, were these "combat missions:" flown BEFORE he decided that SCIENCE didn't matter and "thought he would become a she"? You know, just for **** and giggles!! Or are there FAR DEEPER ISSUES like MENTAL ILLNESS AT WORK HERE that is a DEFINATE DETRIMENT TO MILITARY READINESS??

AS ALWAYS, analysis is REQUIRED from @Blackvegetable  that will ONLY be responded to with more incessant "questions" that are **** deflections from facing TRUTH AND REALITY!!

ROG62 » Yesterday, 10:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:36 pm

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15
• Independents/Others – 44
• Liberals – 98
• Conservatives – 20
• Moderates – 36
• **** YOU

https://presidentialgreatnessproject.com/

AND this....

525 respondents were invited to participate, and 154 usable responses were received, yielding a 29.3% response rate.

*Huey » Today, 5:07 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:07 am

I didn’t run from questions ******. 

When I talk smack it is not from a position of anonymity.  You have my name, my address, my pic, my address, directions to my house and a pic of my house. You leave that part out every time, ****** Boy.

I was also less than 33 miles from your punk *** after years of your threats, ****** boy.  You hid in bed with your binky.  

I am grateful you did not sire a male child.  It would have been another Low T beta male ****** Boy.

Yes...you ran from two questions in favor of bitchyapping.

And you just did it again.

The idea that you weathered "threats" is not credible in the context of your daily meltdowns.

Now focus on the questions..

Scroll back.
 

ROG62 » Yesterday, 10:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:36 pm

Partisan breakdown (2024)

• Democrats – 95
• Republicans – 15
• Independents/Others – 44
• Liberals – 98
• Conservatives – 20
• Moderates – 36
• **** YOU

https://presidentialgreatnessproject.com/

So where did Grifty rank among Conservatives and Republicans? 


And he's off!
 

Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

So where did Grifty rank among Conservatives and Republicans? 

And he's off
 

WHY DON'T YOU TELL US, DIKSUKM, rather than ASKING SOME IRRELEVANT QUESTION!!!

*Beekeeper » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

And JUST LIKE THAT, the "party of science" wants to go in FULL DENIAL that SCIENCE SAYS that NO MAN can become a "woman" simply by "wishing away male DNA". 

Still, NOTHING worthy of spending any time reading. ALWAYS the same **** from the FORUM IDIOT!!

So BeeVee, define a WOMAN for us. Again. And then tell us, were these "combat missions:" flown BEFORE he decided that SCIENCE didn't matter and "thought he would become a she"? You know, just for **** and giggles!! Or are there FAR DEEPER ISSUES like MENTAL ILLNESS AT WORK HERE that is a DEFINATE DETRIMENT TO MILITARY READINESS??

AS ALWAYS, analysis is REQUIRED from @Blackvegetable  that will ONLY be responded to with more incessant "questions" that are **** deflections from facing TRUTH AND REALITY!!

https://youtu.be/FtHZn5X5bXM?si=5Ip4F90B6Ig5FcZ7

*Beekeeper » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

WHY DON'T YOU TELL US, DIKSUKM, rather than ASKING SOME IRRELEVANT QUESTION!!!

@ROG62  has the information at his snot covered fingers...

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

@ROG62  has the information at his snot covered fingers...

So do you, ASSHOLE!! YOUR FINGERS ARE **** COVERED!!

Post it or DIE!! Which would be a DAY OF CELEBRATION!!
 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

https://youtu.be/FtHZn5X5bXM?si=5Ip4F90B6Ig5FcZ7

As ALWAYS, Nothing worth reading and STILL, he can't DEFINE A WOMAN!!

Science DENIER as always. Tell us, what does SCIENCE SAY about a "man becoming a woman" there DIKSUKM??

Blackvegetable » 57 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

57 minutes ago

Yes...you ran from two questions in favor of bitchyapping.

And you just did it again.

The idea that you weathered "threats" is not credible in the context of your daily meltdowns.

Now focus on the questions..

Scroll back.

       

You are bitching about others running from questions as you ran from question on another thread where you were asked about why you supported Clinton and fraud waste and abuse in the 90s but not Trump.

Excuse me if you words have no sting to them. 

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

       

You are bitching about others running from questions as you ran from question on another thread where you were asked about why you supported Clinton and fraud waste and abuse in the 90s but not Trump.

Excuse me if you words have no sting to them. 

Yeah, but his MOUTH has TONS OF STING when wrapped around a BLACK COCK!!

Ask him how that works out!!

*Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

       

You are bitching about others running from questions as you ran from question on another thread where you were asked about why you supported Clinton and fraud waste and abuse in the 90s but not Trump.

Excuse me if you words have no sting to them. 

No, I answered that, Lying Little Tiny.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

No, I answered that, Lying Little Tiny.

 

All you said was it was different.  Non answer, ****** Boy.