Liberal Forum

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

All you said was it was different.  Non answer, ****** Boy.

No, lying little twatty.




 

Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

26 minutes ago

No, lying little twatty.

Sorry, couldn't find that alleged answer in my notifications.  And since notifications are viewable by members not something I would lie about.  

*Huey » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Sorry, couldn't find that alleged answer in my notifications.  And since notifications are viewable by members not something I would lie about.

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

No, that is not the answer.

I guess YOU Lied.  

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

No, that is not the answer.

I guess YOU Lied.

No...that's evidence that you lied about not lying. 


You lie about everything. 
 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

No...that's evidence that you lied about not lying. 


You lie about everything. 
 

 

My notifications are available for any member to view, to include  you.  Go find that answer.  

*Huey » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

My notifications are available for any member to view, to include  you.  Go find that answer.

Then you missed the one where you started running and diverting...

As far as questions, I am done with your questions for today.  YOU need start making your point.  I am not going to do it for you

You always do by running from the question. 

Then you have the **** temerity...

Here is the deal.  I voted for and supported a reduction of the federal work force.  Today I support a reduction of the federal work force.  You, not so much.  Maybe you have a good reason.  Asking questions doesn't answer.

Somehow, you know what I thought in 1995...

And now you misrepresent what I say today.

You haven't posted any of my words opposing "stopping waste, fraud and abuse and government efficiency".

Why haven't you done so?

 
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Then you missed the one where you started running and diverting...

You always do by running from the question. 

Then you have the **** temerity...

Somehow, you know what I thought in 1995...

And now you misrepresent what I say today.

You haven't posted any of my words opposing "stopping waste, fraud and abuse and government efficiency".

Why haven't you done so?

Somehow, you know what I thought in 1995...

That is why I asked this:


Go with this.  In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it.  Today, I support it.  

What about you?

Did you or did you not support what clinton did in regard to fraud, waste and abuse?  


 

BV IS A POS RUNNER COWARD
 

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

That is why I asked this:

Go with this.  In the 90s when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse I supported it.  Today, I support it.  

What about you?

Did you or did you not support what clinton did in regard to fraud, waste and abuse?

You asserted first.

when Clinton was cutting the workforce and getting rid of fraud waste and abuse

Specifically?

Clearly your influencers have expanded their whaddabouts to include Clinton.

What have they told you he did, and how?

Did you or did you not support what clinton did in regard to fraud, waste and abuse?

WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN TOLD HE DID?

Geebus..

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You asserted first.

Specifically?

Clearly your influencers have expanded their whaddabouts to include Clinton.

What have they told you he did, and how?

WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN TOLD HE DID?

Geebus..

Do you support what he did or not?  Stop running and diverting.  You either supported it or you didn't.  This isn't rocket science. 

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Do you support what he did or not?  Stop running and diverting.  You either supported it or you didn't.  This isn't rocket science.

I have no idea what you've been told to believe he did.

Why don't you share some specifics?
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I have no idea what you've been told to believe he did.

Why don't you share some specifics?

BV answering a question with a question once again

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I have no idea what you've been told to believe he did.

Why don't you share some specifics?
 

 

As usual, no stand from ****** Boy.  

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

As usual, no stand from ****** Boy.

Don't run, ******...

What have you been told Clinton did?
 

FJB » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

BV answering a question with a question once again

You haven't defined "woman", Duck.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

You haven't defined "woman", Duck.

Nice try ****... you have been asked to define the term woman many times now. You refuse to do it because you have no **** clue.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Don't run, ******...

What have you been told Clinton did?
 

 

You first:

Do you support what he did or not?  Stop running and diverting.  You either supported it or you didn't.  This isn't rocket science.

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You first:

Don't be a **** idiot.

You haven't told me what he did.


We both know why.

bv running from answering a question once again