Liberal Forum

Cedar » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

There's been a few major accomplishments in the 2 months Trump has been President. USAID is basically defunct, illegal immigration is down 94%, and in my opinion the tariffs will be an accomplishment when all is said and done,

My opinion is just as valid as Katheryn Anne Edwards but as I said mine is just one man's opinion just as hers is one woman's opinion.

Stop rooting for US failure, traitor.

Now you owe me an answer.

My opinion is just as valid as Katheryn Anne Edwards but as I said mine is just one man's opinion just as hers is one woman's opinion

She has a PhD in Economics 


You cast 3 votes for Grifty.

Blackvegetable » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

Define "net".

Saying/doing the same **** again. You already know i defined it. Now, define sirvivorship bias in your words without my help. 

1. Continue to lie about me not defining "net."

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

There it is again, the patented Veghead reversal. You post a thread, refuse to defend it, then demand that I do your job for you. Newsflash: I’m not your student, and this isn’t your lecture hall. You’ve spent years dodging, deflecting, and ducking basic questions about your own claims. If anyone’s got the easy job here, it’s you. Just once, try actually defending your post without hiding behind questions and cheap theater. Let’s see if you can manage that before barking for answers.

1. Continue to prove me right about you saying/doing the same **** day after day.

Stop with the hysterics...no one is watching.

Answer the question and we'll get on with this...
 

Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Saying/doing the same **** again. You already know i defined it. Now, define sirvivorship bias in your words without my help. 

1. Continue to lie about me not defining "net."

You can't define "net"....WTF will you understand about economic models?

 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Stop with the hysterics...no one is watching.

Answer the question and we'll get on with this...

Hysterics? Veghead, you’ve spent the entire thread ducking, deflecting, and demanding like you’re hosting an invisible talk show. You want to “get on with this”? Great, start by doing what you’ve refused to do since post one: answer for your own claims. Until then, you’re not moving forward, you’re just running in circles and hoping nobody notices the trail of dodged questions behind you.


1. Continue to deflect and turn it on me. More evasions, as always. Evade evade evade. 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

She has a PhD in Economics 

You cast 3 votes for Grifty.

That doesn’t answer my question, ******.
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You can't define "net"....WTF will you understand about economic models?

I prove that I defined in it the example and you take off a month. Cannon judges. 

Deal? 

yes...Mr Repeat. we know. You think Cannon has syphilis. Uggghhhhh God you are so **** redundant. 

Cedar » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

That doesn’t answer my question, ******.

You have yet to answer mine, Cheddy.

Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I prove that I defined in it the example and you take off a month. Cannon judges. 

Deal? 

yes...Mr Repeat. we know. You think Cannon has syphilis. Uggghhhhh God you are so **** redundant.

I judge....

This isn't Performance Art.

 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I judge....

This isn't Performance Art.

    Of course you want to judge. God you are so **** god damn stupid. I bet you can't even figure out why that is inappropriate. Seriously, you can't, can you? 

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Hysterics? Veghead, you’ve spent the entire thread ducking, deflecting, and demanding like you’re hosting an invisible talk show. You want to “get on with this”? Great, start by doing what you’ve refused to do since post one: answer for your own claims. Until then, you’re not moving forward, you’re just running in circles and hoping nobody notices the trail of dodged questions behind you.

1. Continue to deflect and turn it on me. More evasions, as always. Evade evade evade.

It's very easy.

You tell me what Level you've reached and I will make it suitably simple.

Let's roll.
 
 

Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

    Of course you want to judge. God you are so **** god damn stupid. I bet you can't even figure out why that is inappropriate. Seriously, you can't, can you?

That matter is settled.

It's in the Chrestomathy...

Your stupid is immortalized....in your own words...

Wanna see it?
 

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

    Of course you want to judge. God you are so **** god damn stupid. I bet you can't even figure out why that is inappropriate. Seriously, you can't, can you?

It's entirely unnecessary, actually. 

Just look at this dumb ****...

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

You have yet to answer mine, Cheddy.

Punt, good choice.

The correct answer was no we aren’t in a recession, you’re just rooting for one.

Thanks for playing.
 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

It's entirely unnecessary, actually. 

Just look at this dumb ****...

     . Try putting the whole thing in context. You are not fooling anyone. you are only screaming how bitter and desperate you are. 

The deal still remains. Cannon judges. 

1. Here comes the syphilis comment. 

Cedar » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Punt, good choice.

The correct answer was no we aren’t in a recession, you’re just rooting for one.

Thanks for playing.

Cheddy,

You didn't answer my question. 

It's not that I'm rooting for a recession. Were that so, I would have voted for Chaos Monkey.
 

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

     . Try putting the whole thing in context. You are not fooling anyone. you are only screaming how bitter and desperate you are. 

The deal still remains. Cannon judges. 

1. Here comes the syphilis comment.

Not necessary..

Just look at it...

Their job creation figure typically reflects net jobs added only. The problem with that is that this figure does not account for jobs that were lost during the same period

I would kill myself had I posted that.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

That matter is settled.

It's in the Chrestomathy...

Your stupid is immortalized....in your own words...

Wanna see it?

Oh please, the “Chrestomathy”? Is that your new word for the pile of quotes you dig through when you’ve got nothing current to say? I already defined “net jobs” in the example, you just didn’t like it, so now you’re pretending it never happened. Classic Veghead move: lie, deflect, then act like you’ve uncovered some ancient truth when really, you’re just recycling your own confusion.



1. More deflection
2. More of demoralizing himself. 
3. And like always, turn it on me so he doesn't have to defend his OP or answer any questions. Usual ****. 

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:33 pm

You didn't read it, did you...

read what?

Vegas » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Oh please, the “Chrestomathy”? Is that your new word for the pile of quotes you dig through when you’ve got nothing current to say? I already defined “net jobs” in the example, you just didn’t like it, so now you’re pretending it never happened. Classic Veghead move: lie, deflect, then act like you’ve uncovered some ancient truth when really, you’re just recycling your own confusion.

1. More deflection
2. More of demoralizing himself. 
3. And like always, turn it on me so he doesn't have to defend his OP or answer any questions. Usual ****.

Had you done so, you'd post it..

But you won't because you know it will subject you to more ridicule.