Ive always "Wondered".
*** queer **** like you always start lying when they're losing.TwoIfByTea » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Ive always "Wondered".
Now "Murdock" I think back to the TV Show 'A-Team" back in the 1980s/1990s.
Now Howling Mad Murdock was a Vietnam Airforce Pilot locked up at Mental Ward a "V/A" Hospital.
The A-Team when needed 2 FLY old "Face-Man" go inside sneak him outta the V/A hospital.
Now all ya talk about is sucking dicks and one up the @$$ too all ya ever wanna post about it seems.
Now do ya wanna "Tell Us Something" or atleast change ya name stop "Disrepecting" Dwight Shultz who played "Howling Mad Murdock" on the A-Team back in the day
Do ya know 2 this current day roughly "Half" the entire population City of Detroit Michigan is considered "Funtionally Illeterate" too..TwoIfByTea » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ okay I can tell ya got "less" than a Forrest Gump I/Q infact your shoe size probably afew points higher than your I/Q.
Nonetheless Forest Gump made a "Life" 4 Himself even knew "Simple" values a below 75 I/Q rating wouldnt put him in Public School.
Now what exactly is "Your Excuse"
https://youtu.be/zLKeU331Nyc?feature=sh ... ure=shared
I’m fine with using tests to measure improvements, literacy, and so forth. The problem is when those tests become high-stakes and yes, when teachers begin “teaching to the test”. When you teach to the test you end up teaching kids how to take tests and not much else. So yes, let’s use tests to measure education"Under those circumstances, I find it difficult to be seized with worry that schools are going to be ruined by teachers “teaching to the test” too much. It is true that school districts that have started taking testing more seriously now need to step up and also take the possibility of outright cheating more seriously. But the fact that huge numbers of kids are passing through school systems and not learning basic literacy drives home the fact that districts also need to take checking to see if the kids are learning anything more seriously. That means tests, and since it’s good to be able to compare different schools to one another that means standardized tests. It’s a limited tool, it shouldn’t be the sole criterion on which the effectiveness of anything is measured, but it’s also an important one.
This also goes back our system of funding "Education" how dollars get doled out.TwoIfByTea » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do ya know 2 this current day roughly "Half" the entire population City of Detroit Michigan is considered "Funtionally Illeterate" too..
https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2 ... -now-what/
"Matt Yglesias points to this study (PDF) from the Detroit Regional Workforce Fund that shows that nearly half of Detroit’s adult population is functionally illiterate. That’s close to 200,000 people – about half of whom have high school diplomas or GED’s. Matt writes:
I’m fine with using tests to measure improvements, literacy, and so forth. The problem is when those tests become high-stakes and yes, when teachers begin “teaching to the test”. When you teach to the test you end up teaching kids how to take tests and not much else. So yes, let’s use tests to measure education"