Look at all of that ****^^^^^!!! Non-profits are the biggest scam in the US right now. Outlaw them.RebelGator » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Name: Selwyn Vickers, M.D.
Title: President/CEO
Charity: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Compensation: $5,787,159
Fiscal Year: 12/31/2023Note: Includes $2,458,333 bonus & incentive compensation.2
Name: Kathryn Martin
Title: Past COO
Charity: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Compensation: $4,762,491
Fiscal Year: 12/31/2023Note: Includes $3,043,618 bonus & incentive compensation and $1,117,022 severance pay.3
Name: Robert W. Stone
Title: President/CEO
Charity: City of Hope & Affiliates
Compensation: $4,559,374
Fiscal Year: 09/30/2023Note: Includes $2,208,096 bonus & incentive compensation.4
Name: Nancy Brown
Title: CEO
Charity: American Heart Association
Compensation: $4,388,845
Fiscal Year: 06/30/2024Note: Includes $3,165,293 bonus & incentive compensation.5
Name: Jason Klein
Title: Senior VP/Chief Investment Officer
Charity: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Compensation: $3,581,445
Fiscal Year: 12/31/2023Note: Includes $2,225,250 bonus & incentive compensation6
Name: Harlan Levine, M.D.
Title: President, Health Innovation & Policy
Charity: City of Hope & Affiliates
Compensation: $2,915,943
Fiscal Year: 09/30/2023Note: Includes $1,737,793 bonus & incentive compensation.7
Name: Kenneth Roth
Title: Past Executive Director
Charity: Human Rights Watch
Compensation: $2,799,333
Fiscal Year: 06/30/2023Note: Includes $2,270,259 of “Other Reportable Compensation.” Total compensation includes “remuneration upon his departure from the organization” and “reasonable compensation for his ongoing assistance and advice to HRW.”8
Name: Michael S. Salem, M.D.
Title: President/CEO
Charity: National Jewish Health
Compensation: $2,582,579
Fiscal Year: 06/30/2023Note: Includes $1,227,650 bonus & incentive compensation.9
That's a whole lot of ****.*Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I do answer most of many of your questions. It is the repeat questions that have already been answered that I refuse to answer again. If your recall is that bad maybe you should just go away.
Wrong one.*Beekeeper » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ There it is!!
viewtopic.php?p=2724665#p2724665
Sucks when your OWN WORDS come back to haunt you, huh, DIKSUKM??
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Blackvegetable » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That's a whole lot of ****.
It is because you don't want to make my point.
Which is EXACTLY why I ask them
*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I have 4 examples in my Sig Box.You also include those stupid questions asking "are these your words". When all you have to is use the quote function. You play like you are an intelligent badass on line when the fact of the matter is you have are of at best avg intelligence and have been spoiled and then bullied you entire life.
.You also include those stupid questions asking "are these your words". When all you have to is use the quote function
only relative to the local talent level.You play like you are an intelligent badass on line
Temperature's risin'...when the fact of the matter is you have are of at best avg intelligence and have been spoiled and then bullied you entire life.
You're wrong....and a **** idiot.
Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You literally cannot recall anything.
I have REPEATEDLY told you why I oblige you to "stand" behind your words.
You refuse to do so for the same reason you won't answer questions.
only relative to the local talent level.
Surely you wouldn't challenge it.
Temperature's risin'...
You are continuing to show I am right. You are spoiled and have a feeling of entitlement.I have REPEATEDLY told you why I oblige you to "stand" behind your words.
Already show to be a lie. See my sig.You refuse to do so for the same reason you won't answer questions.
Why is obliging you to reconcile your words with your other words about me?*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
You are continuing to show I am right. You are spoiled and have a feeling of entitlement.
Already show to be a lie. See my sig.
Temperatures fine.
****.Already show to be a lie. See my sig
Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why is obliging you to reconcile your words with your other words about me?
****.
See the Record.
*Huey » Today, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ When all you gotta do is click the quote function there is no running from any words. Additionally, while you may post verbatim you do not post in context. WHen yo man up and use the quote function I will be happy to answer your question with the context you provided.
PS. The record is in my sig box.
You run from them when you don't even have to do that.When all you gotta do is click the quote function there is no running from any words.
Additionally, while you may post verbatim you do not post in context
Are you taking a second stand on context?Your context is irrelevant.
But we know this is a lie...WHen yo man up and use the quote function I will be happy to answer your question with the context you provided.
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You run from them when you don't even have to do that.
Impervious to edification...
Are these your words?
Are you taking a second stand on context?
But we know this is a lie...
You said a bunch of ****.*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ LMAO! You are still doing it. Dude, I made my point. I am not going on for pages with you about this.
:rofl:*Beekeeper » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ ^^^ STILL hitting that nerve and it's getting funnier watching the anger inside boil over!!
https://i.postimg.cc/DfXWRQX9/People-****-stupid.jpg