Look Out Below!
By Blackvegetable
2 Apr 2025 10:51 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
2 Apr 2025 12:41 pm
No..the only questions have been answered.Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your OP and this is the **** you do. Turn it around. Like always.
The grand finale: “we’re done,” declared unilaterally, like that somehow erases the fact that you still haven’t touched the actual argument. You didn’t prove anything except that you don’t understand what survivorship bias is beyond a surface-level Google skim. You focused on how the data is collected, not how it’s interpreted—or misinterpreted—by the media and political actors to shape a narrative.
As for your “no deeper meaning” line… yeah, that tracks. If it had depth, you’d have drowned by now.
1. he still won't define survivorship bias or net jobs.
2. Blame me
3. flip it around onto me.
Lines bright enough to blind have been established.
2 Apr 2025 12:42 pm
Blackvegetable » Today, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ A trust overseeing Donald Trump’s $2.1 billion stake in the media company that owns Truth Social is paving the way to cash in on its position, which for the past year has formed the bedrock of the president’s fortune.
Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. shares slumped as much as 9.4% before trimming losses Wednesday after the company filed on April 1 to register up to 142.5 million shares and warrants for sale.
The filing is the first step for the president’s trust, controlled by his son Donald Trump Jr.. to potentially sell down his entire 114.75 million share stake. It also registered millions of shares owned by the sponsor of the blank-check firm that merged with Trump Media to take it public last year.
Trump Trust Opens Door to Tap Anchor of His $4.9 Billion Fortune
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... edia-stake
This is a combination of a bust out and pump&dump.
Arguably the only asset of Grifty Media is Grifty....but he's difficult to monetize at a scale sufficient to justify Trump Media's valuation.
So the trick is to yank the equity out the back door before investors realize that they bought into nothing.
If you engage in financial fraud like this, NFTs, and meme coins...and you're brazen enough, you make headlines and billions. If you've appointed lackeys to "regulate" the various markets in which you operate, you can siphon MAGAtRube's money all day - with impunity.
A further benefit is that you can hand out pieces to even more prospective appointees to keep them true to your "cause".
It's a crude grift, but their pigeons are remarkably stupid....and fecund.
Gosh, this sounds worse than an entire shipping boat full of Tesla's on fire...
2 Apr 2025 12:44 pm
That is what a jury, presented with the evidence, determined.*GHETTOBLASTER » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ BV still believes with all of his heart and soul that Trump raped Carroll........he also believes that photo he carries in his wallet is of "Gay Trump"
Evidence so compelling that the respondent didn't even offer a defense.
Would you like to see some of it?
2 Apr 2025 12:44 pm
Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No..the only questions have been answered.
Lines bright enough to blind have been established.
There's a hole in their heads where the golfballs fall in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPBd8eHQqIw
2 Apr 2025 12:47 pm
Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No..the only questions have been answered.
Lines bright enough to blind have been established.
"Lines bright enough to blind"? Veghead, calm down. This is a forum thread, not the closing monologue of a Shakespeare play. You didn’t establish anything except that you still don’t know what survivorship bias means outside of a textbook footnote. You’ve dodged the entire point about how interpretation—not just collection—shapes public perception. But hey, keep shining your imaginary spotlight. The only thing blinding here is your commitment to misunderstanding the argument.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Apr 2025 12:49 pm
Then stop "performing".Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ "Lines bright enough to blind"? Veghead, calm down. This is a forum thread, not the closing monologue of a Shakespeare play. You didn’t establish anything except that you still don’t know what survivorship bias means outside of a textbook footnote. You’ve dodged the entire point about how interpretation—not just collection—shapes public perception. But hey, keep shining your imaginary spotlight. The only thing blinding here is your commitment to misunderstanding the argument.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
You may stop now.
2 Apr 2025 12:52 pm
Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Then stop "performing".
You have no idea what you're talking about.
You may stop now.
Says the guy who’s been monologuing like he’s auditioning for the role of “Internet Authority #1” in a low-budget docudrama. If you really believed I had no idea what I’m talking about, you wouldn’t be five replies deep into trying to outmaneuver the argument you still can’t define correctly. I’ll stop when you finally start engaging with the point—not when you pretend your performance gets a standing ovation.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Apr 2025 12:53 pm
Pedo=Progressives announce the hiring of their new PR and Strategy Partners
The Law Firm of....The Seven DC's from DC LLC.
The Law Firm of....The Seven DC's from DC LLC.
2 Apr 2025 12:53 pm
Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Says the guy who’s been monologuing like he’s auditioning for the role of “Internet Authority #1” in a low-budget docudrama. If you really believed I had no idea what I’m talking about, you wouldn’t be five replies deep into trying to outmaneuver the argument you still can’t define correctly. I’ll stop when you finally start engaging with the point—not when you pretend your performance gets a standing ovation.
I've already defined the levels.the argument you still can’t define correctly.
You lose at every one.
2 Apr 2025 12:55 pm
Your definition was "It's a sampling error."
Yeah, no ****. So are 300 other types of biases.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Apr 2025 1:02 pm
2 Apr 2025 1:04 pm
No....that's a lie.Vegas » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your definition was "It's a sampling error."
Yeah, no ****. So are 300 other types of biases.
List themSo are 300 other types of biases.
Every one...and make sure they are all sampling errors.
2 Apr 2025 1:10 pm
I show that you said it was a sampling error, and you take off a month. Deal?Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No....that's a lie.
List them
Every one...and make sure they are all sampling errors.
300 was obviously a hyperbole you **** idiot. I am not going to list all of them. This is enough to embarrass you:
1. Selection Bias: Occurs when the sample collected is not representative of the population intended to be analyzed, leading to skewed results.
Example: Studying only people who responded to an online survey about internet use. You’re automatically excluding non-users, skewing your conclusions.
2. Undercoverage Bias: Occurs when some members of the population are inadequately represented in the sample.Example: A telephone survey using landlines will miss younger people who mostly use cell phones, underrepresenting their opinions.
3. Exclusion Bias: Happens when certain groups are deliberately or accidentally left out of the sample.Example: A medical trial that excludes elderly participants, even though the treatment is intended for all adults.
4. Publication Bias: This happens when studies with significant or positive findings are more likely to be published, and thus more likely to be included in reviews or meta-analyses.Example: A new drug appears highly effective in the literature, but dozens of unpublished trials with null results were never seen.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Apr 2025 1:11 pm
Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I show that you said it was a sampling error, and you take off a month. Deal?
300 was obviously a hyperbole you **** idiot. I am not going to list all of them. This is enough to embarrass you:
everything you post is ****.
As demonstrated..
There are no meanings left to explore.
2 Apr 2025 1:15 pm
A crypto-friendlier SEC says meme coins aren't securities
https://www.investmentnews.com/alternat ... ies/259507
Notably, President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump launched their own meme coins shortly before the new president took office. Though crypto assets are notoriously volatile, those coins lost most of their value in a very short timeframe...
The SEC under new leadership has already been showing how much friendlier it is to the crypto world than it was under former chair Gary Gensler. The agency now has a crypto task force headed by Commissioner Hester Pierce that promises to “develop a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework for crypto assets.”
Also on Thursday, the SEC dismissed a civil enforcement action against Coinbase, which it had accused of violating securities laws in trading a range of crypto assets.
Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw, the lone Democrat remaining on the commission, objected to both the SEC’s statement on meme coins and the dismissal of the enforcement action.
https://www.investmentnews.com/alternat ... ies/259507
Notably, President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump launched their own meme coins shortly before the new president took office. Though crypto assets are notoriously volatile, those coins lost most of their value in a very short timeframe...
The SEC under new leadership has already been showing how much friendlier it is to the crypto world than it was under former chair Gary Gensler. The agency now has a crypto task force headed by Commissioner Hester Pierce that promises to “develop a comprehensive and clear regulatory framework for crypto assets.”
Also on Thursday, the SEC dismissed a civil enforcement action against Coinbase, which it had accused of violating securities laws in trading a range of crypto assets.
Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw, the lone Democrat remaining on the commission, objected to both the SEC’s statement on meme coins and the dismissal of the enforcement action.
2 Apr 2025 1:16 pm
Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ everything you post is ****.
As demonstrated..
There are no meanings left to explore.
So god damn **** stupid. Veghead’s reached that final stage of forum combustion: total surrender masked as smug dismissal. “There are no meanings left to explore”? That’s not debate, that’s a villain monologue from a rejected sci-fi script.
Whom am I addressing ^^^
So we’ve reached the “there are no meanings left to explore” phase of your meltdown. That’s code for “I ran out of ways to deflect, and I’m hoping a dramatic exit line will distract from the fact that I still can’t address a single point.” You keep calling everything ****, but oddly enough, you’ve got no counter-arguments, just recycled insults and the emotional range of a Reddit thread on fire. Keep going, though. Your spiral is the most original thing you’ve posted in years.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Apr 2025 1:18 pm
No need for color commentary.Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Veghead’s reached that final stage of forum combustion: total surrender masked as smug dismissal. “There are no meanings left to explore”? That’s not debate, that’s a villain monologue from a rejected sci-fi script.
Whom am I addressing ^^^
So we’ve reached the “there are no meanings left to explore” phase of your meltdown. That’s code for “I ran out of ways to deflect, and I’m hoping a dramatic exit line will distract from the fact that I still can’t address a single point.” You keep calling everything ****, but oddly enough, you’ve got no counter-arguments, just recycled insults and the emotional range of a Reddit thread on fire. Keep going, though. Your spiral is the most original thing you’ve posted in years.
2 Apr 2025 1:19 pm
I would settle for any commentary from you that isn't copy/pasted from the internet for once.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
2 Apr 2025 1:32 pm
You complain when I do, and you complain when I don't.Vegas » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I would settle for any commentary from you that isn't copy/pasted from the internet for once.
Now I think it time for you to prove that you aren't a moron.
2 Apr 2025 1:36 pm
Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You complain when I do, and you complain when I don't.
Now I think it time for you to prove that you aren't a moron.
Veghead’s favorite fallback: “prove you’re not a moron.” It’s like his personal version of Ctrl+V for when he’s fresh out of thoughts...which is usual none.
Classic Veghead two-step: first claim I complain no matter what, then fall back on your trusty “prove you’re not a moron” line like it’s still fresh after the thousandth use. If you had a dollar for every time you recycled that phrase, maybe you could finally invest in an original thought. But hey, I get it—when you’ve got no argument, reruns are all you’ve got left.
1. Continue to prove that he says the same crap, day after day.
Retarded Horse's view on women.
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
JohnEdgarSlowHorses » Today, 7:28 pm » wrote: ↑Today, 7:28 pm
- I LOVE IT WHEN A CRACK WHORE GETS BEAT UP Image
- I WANT TO WATCH YOU BEAT YOUR CRACK WHORE WIFE Image Image Image
- PUT THAT WIFE BEATER ON AND GET BUSY
Who is online
In total there are 19052 users online :: 19 registered, 17 bots, and 19016 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Mrkelly, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, *Beekeeper, jerra b, Skans, EDC4ALL!, murdock, PhiloBeddo, Deezer Shoove, Harper Lee, nefarious101, *Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, proximic, Custo, Yahoo! Slurp, Pinterest, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, app.hypefactors.com, ADmantX, linkfluence.com, semantic-visions.com, YandexBot, curl/7, BLEXBot, Googlebot, bingbot