Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:41 pm

No..the only questions have been answered.

Lines bright enough to blind have been established.

**** you ya lying child molesting **** *** rapist!

Blackvegetable » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

Your job in both instances.

You have demonstrated that you don't know either. So do it. 

Your usual game of flipping it on me has never worked. I don't understand why you still employ the same tactic.

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:05 am

IPO's are securities...meme coins aren't. 

With respect to Grifty Media, this confirms exactly what I told you...
—but that didn’t matter to Trump-loving investors, who bid up shares to unconscionable heights, gambling on the absurdity of it all and adding billions to Trump’s fortune in the process

because you people are so **** g'ddammned stupid.

there was still an initial public offering in which people were able to invest, right?

ROG62 » Today, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:28 pm

there was still an initial public offering in which people were able to invest, right?

JuCo,

You don't know **** about this.....either...

Do you know what a "blank check" company is?

 

Vegas » Today, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:22 pm

You have demonstrated that you don't know either. So do it. 

Your usual game of flipping it on me has never worked. I don't understand why you still employ the same tactic.

No....you're lying.

Your job....in each instance.



 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

No....you're lying.

Your job....in each instance.

No...your lying. Now do it. 

 

Vegas » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

No...your lying. Now do it.

It's your job.

Your rule...
 

Blackvegetable » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

It's your job.

Your rule...

If true, then post my claim. Do it in your "are these your words?" fashion.  

Now. 

Vegas » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

If true, then post my claim. Do it in your "are these your words?" fashion.  

Now.

No...You aren't owed anything.

Now define the terms YOU chose to use...

Or acknowledge that you are a moron
 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

No...You aren't owed anything.

Now define the terms YOU chose to use...

Or acknowledge that you are a moron

What **** term are you talking about, *******? I never set any terms. 

**** your stalling. Define survivorship bias and net jobs in your words, without my help. 

Now coward. 

Vegas » Yesterday, 8:41 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:41 pm

What **** term are you talking about, *******? I never set any terms. 

**** your stalling. Define survivorship bias and net jobs in your words, without my help. 

Now coward.

Did I say "set"?

**** *******.

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Did I say "set"?

**** *******.

Best Day BV.. Thanks for trying to get some intelligence into the orange mush brains.
 

Vegas » Yesterday, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:09 pm

The guy does not carry the intellectual capacity to debate with any keen insights or grace. I thought of the perfect analogy about him. He is like a male honeybee. Male honeybees don't have stingers. They are harmless. But they are also a pain in the ***. He likes to pretend that he has a stinger, so he flops stingless *** on people hoping that it will leave a mark. But since he doesn't have a stinger, he just gets frustrated from being swatted all the time.

reminds me of when he'd show his miserable *** on .org...he'd come in all macho, pounding on his puffed out chest like some alpha male only to last a few hours as continuous beatings of getting his *** handed to him on a platter...IceBergSlim...hence being called IBS...irritable like the ACRONYM ...  
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 4:32 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:32 am

Did I say "set"?

**** *******.

Or for **** sake. Just stop already. Why do you insist on making an *** of yourself? 

Define survivorship bias and net jobs in your words, without my help. 

Now!

Vegas » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Or for **** sake. Just stop already. Why do you insist on making an *** of yourself? 

Define survivorship bias and net jobs in your words, without my help. 

Now!

What do you call this?


"Tantrumstalking"?

How novel.

Admit that you have no idea what the terms mean and I will explain them again.

In spite of the futility of the endeavor.

Ask me why it is futile.
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

What do you call this?

"Tantrumstalking"?

How novel.

Admit that you have no idea what the terms mean and I will explain them again.

In spite of the futility of the endeavor.

Ask me why it is futile.

You've gone full circle again, accusing me of “tantrumstalking” (your new favorite buzzword), offering a patronizing “explanation” for concepts you still don't understand, and of course, trying to trap me into asking you questions so you can avoid answering mine.

And no, I won’t be asking why it’s futile—because we all already know. It’s not that explaining things is hard for you... it’s that comprehension is even harder. You're not teaching, you're stalling. Keep telling yourself it’s clever though, whatever helps you cope with getting wrecked in slow motion.Veghead pretending he’s the reluctant genius offering to re-explain concepts he’s butchered five times already. You still haven’t demonstrated you understand either term beyond the first Google hit, but sure, offer another condescending “lesson” no one asked for. 
 

Vegas » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

You've gone full circle again, accusing me of “tantrumstalking” (your new favorite buzzword), offering a patronizing “explanation” for concepts you still don't understand, and of course, trying to trap me into asking you questions so you can avoid answering mine.

And no, I won’t be asking why it’s futile—because we all already know. It’s not that explaining things is hard for you... it’s that comprehension is even harder. You're not teaching, you're stalling. Keep telling yourself it’s clever though, whatever helps you cope with getting wrecked in slow motion.Veghead pretending he’s the reluctant genius offering to re-explain concepts he’s butchered five times already. You still haven’t demonstrated you understand either term beyond the first Google hit, but sure, offer another condescending “lesson” no one asked for.

Read it yesterday....and the day before....and the day before that....and every day that preceeded it.

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Read it yesterday....and the day before....and the day before that....and every day that preceeded it.

YET, YOU STILL HAVEN'T DEFINED THE TERM WOMAN

FJB » Yesterday, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:00 am

YET, YOU STILL HAVEN'T DEFINED THE TERM WOMAN

Phook De Phook

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppA-QtSmdgk

Vegas » 02 Apr 2025, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Apr 2025, 6:22 pm

You have demonstrated that you don't know either. So do it. 

Your usual game of flipping it on me has never worked. I don't understand why you still employ the same tactic.

Because he's an ignorant jigaboo traitor.