Yes.....Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Veghead, you’ve been told this a million times, but let’s go for a million and one: this is your thread. That means you made the claim, and you are responsible for producing the argument. It’s not my job to build your case for you while you sit there pointing fingers and shrieking “tantrum!” like it’s a debate tactic.
If you’re incapable of defending your own OP without turning it into a whine-fest of accusations and questions, maybe stop posting threads you can’t carry. Until then, your entire style remains what it’s always been—loud, empty, and allergic to accountability.
So you wish to deflect from your own OP so you don't have to defend it again.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Yes.....
You used the terms "survivorship bias" and "net".
define them.
Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ First acknowledge that you already know what the rule is. This is just another attempt for you to express your control issues.
Do it now and I will repost it.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ I don't know anything about a Rule....I know you offer an excuse..
No....I want you to subject yourself to your rules.Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ So you wish to deflect from your own OP so you don't have to defend it again.
Got it.
Post it and we'll see.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ No....I want you to subject yourself to your rules.
Unless, of course, you want to confess that you're a narcissist.
If they were Rules, they would apply to you.
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ If they were Rules, they would apply to you.
Unless you're a narcissist.
To whom are you making the announcement?
Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ To whom are you making the announcement?
No one is watching you humiliate yourself.
You're deflecting from your asskicking on that very score.Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
He still can't figure it out.
So will you be defending your OP sometime or continue to hide behind deflections?
Blatant projection again. He can't even hide it.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑ You're deflecting from your asskicking on that very score.
You can't even define your terms.
I have no problem defending my OP.
I have no problem doing so...Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ Blatant projection again. He can't even hide it.
So no, you won't be defending your OP. Ok Mary, got it.
Lying *** child molester.Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ US Emerges as Biggest Loser in Markets From Trump’s Tariffs
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -s-tariffs
President Donald Trump’s shake-up of the global trading system is hurting US assets more than those in many of the big economies he has just slapped with additional tariffs.
US equity index futures tumbled more than 4% after Trump announced a sweeping series of tariffs following the market close on Wednesday, and a gauge of the dollar slumped. But the impact elsewhere was less extreme. The Stoxx Europe 600 was down 1.9%, while the euro was up 2.2% against the dollar, hitting its highest level since October. A broad gauge of Asian stocks fell as much as 1.7%.
The widespread selloff in global markets makes clear that investors don’t expect any winners from the latest — and by the far the largest — salvo in a growing trade war. But they also suggest the US itself might be one of the biggest victims of Trump’s protectionist policies.
If you're gonna bet on any contrarian, choose the one who lost a fortune on casinos...
Not IN them, mind you....