Liberal Forum

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 10:56 am

There it is. He continue to flip it on me, so he doesn't have to defend anything. 

I gave you my question. I am not reposting it. Figure it out.

**** off.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:00 am

**** off.

Eat a dick, ***. Child molester.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:00 am

**** off.

     Mary lost again. 
 
 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:04 am

     Mary lost again.

Watch..


I will adress this question...

Why don’t you explain how this article demonstrates that Trump’s tariff policy is a net economic loss for the US, beyond just short-term investor reaction?

With your pledge that, immediately thereafter, you admit to your complete lack of training in economics and general innumeracy.

Do we have a deal?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:08 am

Watch..

I will adress this question...

With your pledge that, immediately thereafter, you admit to your complete lack of training in economics and general innumeracy.

Do we have a deal?

No, Veghead—here’s the actual deal: you answer the question first, clearly and directly, and then we’ll see if there’s anything there worth responding to. But if your answer is just another smug dodge, condescending deflection, or incoherent rant, then you’re not proving anything except your own ignorance.

If you can’t defend your argument without forcing preconditions, just admit you don’t know what you’re talking about and spare us the theater.

Deal?

1. Of course he will evade. Still refuses to defend his OP. 
 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:12 am

No, Veghead—here’s the actual deal: you answer the question first, clearly and directly, and then we’ll see if there’s anything there worth responding to. But if your answer is just another smug dodge, condescending deflection, or incoherent rant, then you’re not proving anything except your own ignorance.

If you can’t defend your argument without forcing preconditions, just admit you don’t know what you’re talking about and spare us the theater.

Deal?

1. Of course he will evade. Still refuses to defend his OP.

We can discuss such a deal AFTER your confession.

Of course you will welsh, but everyone will clearly see what a lying coward you are.

Do we have a deal?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:19 am

We can discuss such a deal AFTER your confession.

Of course you will welsh, but everyone will clearly see what a lying coward you are.

Do we have a deal?

There it is—the desperation dance. Still demanding a “confession” before answering your own thread, like that somehow makes you the intellectual alpha instead of the guy clearly stalling for time. You’ve been dodging basic questions with the same tired bluff for years, Veghead.

 Here’s the only deal: you either answer the question you were asked, directly and intelligently, or you admit you’re afraid to. No more preconditions, no more games. If you're so confident, prove it. Otherwise, just admit what the whole forum already suspects—you're all bark, no argument.
 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:20 am

There it is—the desperation dance. Still demanding a “confession” before answering your own thread, like that somehow makes you the intellectual alpha instead of the guy clearly stalling for time. You’ve been dodging basic questions with the same tired bluff for years, Veghead.

 Here’s the only deal: you either answer the question you were asked, directly and intelligently, or you admit you’re afraid to. No more preconditions, no more games. If you're so confident, prove it. Otherwise, just admit what the whole forum already suspects—you're all bark, no argument.

There it is—the desperation dance. Still demanding a “confession” before answering your own thread

I show that you are lying, and you take two months off.

Deal?

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:31 am

I show that you are lying, and you take two months off.

Deal?

 Since I know you have a habit of only reading the first sentence before panicking and replying, I’ll make this one nice and comfy—so you don’t miss what’s about to absolutely dismantle your nonsense.

 You’ve been clinging to that “two-month disappearance” fantasy like it’s your emotional support blanket. If your arguments were even half as solid as your delusions, you wouldn’t need to keep recycling this imaginary win every time you get called out.

Here is my response for you to evade, deflect, and strike through. 

 Let’s keep this real simple: this is your thread, your claim, and your job to defend it. No conditions, no evasions, and definitely no fake deals designed to avoid responsibility. Either answer the damn question with your own thoughts or finally admit what the rest of us already know—you’ve got nothing but deflection and drama.

 
 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:41 am

 Since I know you have a habit of only reading the first sentence before panicking and replying, I’ll make this one nice and comfy—so you don’t miss what’s about to absolutely dismantle your nonsense.

 You’ve been clinging to that “two-month disappearance” fantasy like it’s your emotional support blanket. If your arguments were even half as solid as your delusions, you wouldn’t need to keep recycling this imaginary win every time you get called out.

Here is my response for you to evade, deflect, and strike through.

Stop deflecting. 

It is time to put a temporary stop to your lying..

Do we have a deal?
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:49 am

Stop deflecting. 

It is time to put a temporary stop to your lying..

Do we have a deal?

Whom am I addressing here?  Oh man, the projection is getting Olympic-level now. “Stop deflecting” from the guy who’s built an entire personality around dodging like it’s a martial art.

Still trying to negotiate from the fetal position, huh? You’ve spent this entire thread dodging, deflecting, and now—my personal favorite—accusing me of deflecting after refusing to answer a single question about your own OP. That’s not a debate tactic, Veghead. That’s just sad projection dressed up in smug punctuation.

My response...again:

Here’s the only “deal” you’re getting: answer the damn question or stop pretending you have the intellectual spine to start threads in the first place. You’ve been exposed more times than your talking points, and at this point, the only thing getting temporarily stopped is your credibility—again.

 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:53 am

Whom am I addressing here?  Oh man, the projection is getting Olympic-level now. “Stop deflecting” from the guy who’s built an entire personality around dodging like it’s a martial art.

Still trying to negotiate from the fetal position, huh? You’ve spent this entire thread dodging, deflecting, and now—my personal favorite—accusing me of deflecting after refusing to answer a single question about your own OP. That’s not a debate tactic, Veghead. That’s just sad projection dressed up in smug punctuation.

My response...again:

You lied.

You need to pay for so doing.

Or, you can just confess to being ignorant and dishonest.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 11:55 am

You lied.

You need to pay for so doing.

Or, you can just confess to being ignorant and dishonest.

Post my lie. 

“You lied… you must pay…Wow. You’ve gone from dodging questions to staging a courtroom drama in your head. “You lied, you must pay”? Relax, Judge Mary, this is a forum thread, not a medieval inquisition.

If you spent half as much energy answering basic questions as you do building these weird little fantasy trials, we might’ve had a real discussion by now. But hey, keep demanding false confessions if it makes you feel like you’re winning something. The rest of us are just enjoying the show.
 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 12:00 pm

Post my lie. 

“You lied… you must pay…Wow. You’ve gone from dodging questions to staging a courtroom drama in your head. “You lied, you must pay”? Relax, Judge Mary, this is a forum thread, not a medieval inquisition.

If you spent half as much energy answering basic questions as you do building these weird little fantasy trials, we might’ve had a real discussion by now. But hey, keep demanding false confessions if it makes you feel like you’re winning something. The rest of us are just enjoying the show.

viewtopic.php?p=2724997#p2724997

Now confess 

Mrkelly » 03 Apr 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 9:18 am

I hope that you are wrong 

I think once tRump is told that he is being stupid 

he will be forced to go back on his threats … as usual 

​​​​​​.But I sure wouldn’t bet on it

That's where you're stupid, everyone else knows he's wrong.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 12:16 pm

viewtopic.php?p=2724997#p2724997

Now confess

I will not entertain your stalking. Post what I said unedited. Give me one of your "are these your words" comeback. 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 12:25 pm

I will not entertain your stalking. Post what I said unedited. Give me one of your "are these your words" comeback.

I just did, you **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 03 Apr 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 12:41 pm

I just did, you **** idiot.

I will not entertain your stalking. 

Besides, you still have to prove it's a lie. Your claim, your job. Do you need the video? 

nefarious101 » 03 Apr 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 9:10 am

and look at the educated idiots howl about it

their opinions are nothing but "Copy and Paste" fake news articles that they can't even understand.

the big deal now is to protest without actually knowing what you're protesting....

their leadership tells them not to talk to anyone who asks questions

they actually have "Minders" at the protests to enforce the "No talk" rule.....just like China and North Korea do

that's right...can't be caught with their panties down....
 

Vegas » 03 Apr 2025, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Apr 2025, 12:45 pm

I will not entertain your stalking. 

Besides, you still have to prove it's a lie. Your claim, your job. Do you need the video?

"Post my lie!"

"No...not like THAT!"

Contemptible ******.

Besides, you still have to prove it's a lie

I do, and you take two months off...

Deal?


**** coward.