Liberal Forum

*Huey » Today, 5:11 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:11 am

Just admit your party ran a man in severe mental decline followed by a cackling idiot who was chosen due to identity politics.

Why did you not cast a third proud vote for the rapist felon convinced he won the 2020 election?

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Why did you not cast a third proud vote for the rapist felon convinced he won the 2020 election?

This isn't about me.  Stop trying to hijack someone else's thread.  Start your own thread.  

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

This isn't about me.  Stop trying to hijack someone else's thread.  Start your own thread.

Are these your words?

Just admit your party ran a man in severe mental decline followed by a cackling idiot who was chosen due to identity politics.

Just admit
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Are these your words?

Just admit

Let’s go **** up one of your threads.

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Let’s go **** up one of your threads.

Are they, or are they not, your words - on this thread?
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Are they, or are they not, your words - on this thread?

 

*Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

This isn't about me.  Stop trying to hijack someone else's thread.  Start your own thread.

BV is welcome to drag you around in my thread

Mrkelly » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

BV is welcome to drag you around in my thread

You said it.  Game on.

 

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Are they, or are they not, your words - on this thread?
 

 

Anybody with a shred of common sense knows they are, idiot.  My name is on the quote, *******/

*Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

You said it.  Game on.

  Yes it is
 

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Anybody with a shred of common sense knows they are, idiot.  My name is on the quote, *******/

And this is your way of suggesting that you fail to see the relevance? 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

And this is your way of suggesting that you fail to see the relevance?

Look, this is your way of finally admitting that Biden was not mentally fit to be president and Harris was a piss poor candidate.  I have said my peace dozen's of times concerning Trump.

Why are you so afraid of being truthful about Biden and Harris?  But hey, you morons keep remain in denial the pubs will be in charge for a long time to come. 

Mrkelly » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

BV is welcome to drag you around in my thread

Thank you...

I'm confident that my question is entirely relevant...

Of course, Neverrun always has good reason to neverrun.

 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Look, this is your way of finally admitting that Biden was not mentally fit to be president and Harris was a piss poor candidate.  I have said my peace dozen's of times concerning Trump.

Why are you so afraid of being truthful about Biden and Harris?  But hey, you morons keep remain in denial the pubs will be in charge for a long time to come.

Answer the question so that we may move on with the delimbing.

Blackvegetable » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

Answer the question so that we may move on with the delimbing.

 

Been asked and answered many times previous.  My post is about the candidates the Dems chose to run.  I am not interested in your bait and switch BS.  If you had a case to "delimb" me you would have posted it already. 

Thanks for your forfeit.  
 

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Been asked and answered many times previous.  My post is about the candidates the Dems chose to run.  I am not interested in your bait and switch BS.  If you had a case to "delimb" me you would have posted it already. 

Thanks for your forfeit.

Tiny,

It was answered once.

On the other hand, you've neverrun from it ever since...

I read your posr, and commented directly on the content and point of it.

Your response to the question will go a long way towards making my point.

Which is why you refuse to answer.


That allows you to live to repeat the Stupid later today.

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Tiny,

It was answered once.

On the other hand, you've neverrun from it ever since...

I read your posr, and commented directly on the content and point of it.

Your response to the question will go a long way towards making my point.

Which is why you refuse to answer.


That allows you to live to repeat the Stupid later today.

 

 

I read your posr, and commented directly on the content and point of it.

I didn't say anything about Trump, so no, you made no case and did not comment directly on my content.

You have been told when you ask the same question dozens of times I am not going to answer it everytime.  Especially when you are trying to divert.

Now, back to my comments.  Even Banjo Boy morning Schmo is backtracking and saying Biden was not mentally fit.  

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I didn't say anything about Trump, so no, you made no case and did not comment directly on my content.

You have been told when you ask the same question dozens of times I am not going to answer it everytime.  Especially when you are trying to divert.

Now, back to my comments.  Even Banjo Boy morning Schmo is backtracking and saying Biden was not mentally fit.

So it IS about "mental fitness"?

 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

So it IS about "mental fitness"?

 

 

Specifically, Joe Biden's mental fitness and Harris's viability as a candidate.

Acknowledge you were answered.  

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Specifically, Joe Biden's mental fitness and Harris's viability as a candidate.

Acknowledge you were answered.

It is either about "mental fitness" as a criterion, or it isn't.