Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

It is either about "mental fitness" as a criterion, or it isn't. 


 

 

Yes, Specifically, Joe Biden's mental fitness and Harris's viability as a candidate.  If you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.

 

*Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Yes, Specifically, Joe Biden's mental fitness and Harris's viability as a candidate.  If you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.

Weren't there two choices?

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:54 am

Weren't there two choices?

 

This was my post

Just admit your party ran a man in severe mental decline followed by a cackling idiot who was chosen due to identity politics.

*Huey » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

This was my post

Just admit your party ran a man in severe mental decline followed by a cackling idiot who was chosen due to identity politics.

Answer the question, Neverrun. 

I have been addressing your post.

You've been neverrunning.

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

Answer the question, Neverrun. 


 

         

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Answer the question, Neverrun. 

I have been addressing your post.

You've been neverrunning.

 

No, you haven't.  My post was not about Trump.It was about the candidates the Dems chose run and why they lost.  I/A/W the OP.

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

No, you haven't.  My post was not about Trump.It was about the candidates the Dems chose run and why they lost.  I/A/W the OP.

But that requires you taking two opposing stands on the relevance of "mental fitness" when choosing a candidate...


Not that it is anything new for you, but just sayin'....
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

But that requires you taking two opposing stands on the relevance of "mental fitness" when choosing a candidate...

Not that it is anything new for you, but just sayin'....

If  you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.  And remember, I didn't vote for him, Nancy.  

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

If  you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.  And remember, I didn't vote for him, Nancy.

You're struggling to read..

Trump wasn't mentioned.


 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You're struggling to read..

Trump wasn't mentioned.

Yeah, you were setting that up.  SSDD from you.

 

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Yeah, you were setting that up.  SSDD from you.

Only to the extent that it illustrates your two stands on the question of "mental fitness" or "cackling idiocy"

You don't deny that you take two stands, do you?

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Only to the extent that it illustrates your two stands on the question of "mental fitness" or "cackling idiocy"

You don't deny that you take two stands, do you?

 

You will have to post these two stands.  
 

*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

You will have to post these two stands.

Why?

You have very strict rules about repeating.


 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Why?

You have very strict rules about repeating.


 

 

I haven't taken two stands on this.  This is one of your goto diversions. So, if this is what you wish to discuss, be very specific on what these two stands are concerning candidates and mental acuity.  

Although being specific is something you avoid, like taking a stand.  
 

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

I haven't taken two stands on this.  This is one of your goto diversions. So, if this is what you wish to discuss, be very specific on what these two stands are concerning candidates and mental acuity.  

Although being specific is something you avoid, like taking a stand.

To be clear

You are asking me to repost your words...


Is this correct?
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

To be clear

You are asking me to repost your words...


Is this correct?
 

 

To be clear you are lying.  When I accuse you of something I do it like a man.  I post using the reply function or link, posting your words in full.  

This IS correct.