Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:44 am

It is either about "mental fitness" as a criterion, or it isn't. 


 

 

Yes, Specifically, Joe Biden's mental fitness and Harris's viability as a candidate.  If you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.

 

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:46 am

Yes, Specifically, Joe Biden's mental fitness and Harris's viability as a candidate.  If you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.

Weren't there two choices?

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 8:54 am

Weren't there two choices?

 

This was my post

Just admit your party ran a man in severe mental decline followed by a cackling idiot who was chosen due to identity politics.

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:01 am

This was my post

Just admit your party ran a man in severe mental decline followed by a cackling idiot who was chosen due to identity politics.

Answer the question, Neverrun. 

I have been addressing your post.

You've been neverrunning.

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:20 am

Answer the question, Neverrun. 


 

         

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:20 am

Answer the question, Neverrun. 

I have been addressing your post.

You've been neverrunning.

 

No, you haven't.  My post was not about Trump.It was about the candidates the Dems chose run and why they lost.  I/A/W the OP.

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:33 am

No, you haven't.  My post was not about Trump.It was about the candidates the Dems chose run and why they lost.  I/A/W the OP.

But that requires you taking two opposing stands on the relevance of "mental fitness" when choosing a candidate...


Not that it is anything new for you, but just sayin'....
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:35 am

But that requires you taking two opposing stands on the relevance of "mental fitness" when choosing a candidate...

Not that it is anything new for you, but just sayin'....

If  you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.  And remember, I didn't vote for him, Nancy.  

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:42 am

If  you wish to discuss Trump start a thread.  And remember, I didn't vote for him, Nancy.

You're struggling to read..

Trump wasn't mentioned.


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:48 am

You're struggling to read..

Trump wasn't mentioned.

Yeah, you were setting that up.  SSDD from you.

 

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:50 am

Yeah, you were setting that up.  SSDD from you.

Only to the extent that it illustrates your two stands on the question of "mental fitness" or "cackling idiocy"

You don't deny that you take two stands, do you?

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:54 am

Only to the extent that it illustrates your two stands on the question of "mental fitness" or "cackling idiocy"

You don't deny that you take two stands, do you?

 

You will have to post these two stands.  
 

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:54 am

You will have to post these two stands.

Why?

You have very strict rules about repeating.


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:55 am

Why?

You have very strict rules about repeating.


 

 

I haven't taken two stands on this.  This is one of your goto diversions. So, if this is what you wish to discuss, be very specific on what these two stands are concerning candidates and mental acuity.  

Although being specific is something you avoid, like taking a stand.  
 

*Huey » 04 Apr 2025, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 10:57 am

I haven't taken two stands on this.  This is one of your goto diversions. So, if this is what you wish to discuss, be very specific on what these two stands are concerning candidates and mental acuity.  

Although being specific is something you avoid, like taking a stand.

To be clear

You are asking me to repost your words...


Is this correct?
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Apr 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

04 Apr 2025, 11:03 am

To be clear

You are asking me to repost your words...


Is this correct?
 

 

To be clear you are lying.  When I accuse you of something I do it like a man.  I post using the reply function or link, posting your words in full.  

This IS correct.