Here is your chance to post your stand on the issue. Then we can continue. Man up!
It's your chance to take a stand....on your words...*Huey » 07 Apr 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ Here is your chance to post your stand on the issue. Then we can continue. Man up!
Let me know when you read the article. That is where the answer is, NoStands.
I have taken a stand on this numerous time. Subway crime has been an issue since the pandemic. You have argued against that. Don't know why. Not like you have that issue in Salem, NHBlackvegetable » 07 Apr 2025, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ It's your chance to take a stand....on your words...
*Huey » 07 Apr 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Let me know when you read the article. That is where the answer is, NoStands.
Blackvegetable » 07 Apr 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ you won't even take that stand.
It's the NYPost...
It's what they do.....and why the data always rapes you.
I take stands....I don't join them......sorta...
Argue with the NYTs.Blackvegetable » 07 Apr 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ you won't even take that stand.
It's the NYPost...
It's what they do.....and why the data always rapes you.
Nows a good time to prove that.
We've already gone over this...*Huey » 07 Apr 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑ Argue with the NYTs.
Subway Violence Stubbornly Defies All Efforts to Quell ItA string of attacks has riders devising their own strategies to stay safe, even after years of official efforts to make New York’s vital transportation system secure.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/01/nyre ... ll-it.html
Statistics show that it may not be just a feeling. While violent crime in the subway has fluctuated in the past few years, there has been a substantial increase in key categories since before the coronavirus pandemic.
Felony assaults in the system are up 55 percent since 2019. Murders rose from three in 2019 to 10 in the year that just ended. In 2024, people were pushed to the tracks at least 25 times — about once every two weeks — compared with 20 times in 2019.
Even the NYTs says you are full of ****.
No, we haven't. Your argument is with one of your favorite sources. The NYTs says you are full of ****.
You know how you feel about demands...
Yes...we have.*Huey » 07 Apr 2025, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑ No, we haven't. Your argument is with one of your favorite sources. The NYTs says you are full of ****.
Blackvegetable » 07 Apr 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ You know how you feel about demands...
But if you want to post the rule, and your stipulation.....
Apparently your reading skills suck.
That **** won't hunt, Runny...
We've gone over that too, Verbal.
Breaking the law daily. How so?JohnnyYou » 07 Apr 2025, 4:23 am » wrote: ↑ It's gotta be a super tough job. Holman is basically breaking the law daily.
I have not lost respect for those who try to maintain the law of the land. But some are pushing the limit.
Holman is not in charge of bring down Subway Crime.JohnnyYou » 07 Apr 2025, 4:23 am » wrote: ↑ It's gotta be a super tough job. Holman is basically breaking the law daily.
I have not lost respect for those who try to maintain the law of the land. But some are pushing the limit.