Liberal Forum

DO NOT ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE *** BV

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Do you think you're smarter than Karoline?

What would you know about intelligence?...you're a dickhead with Trump Derangement

ohhhh....I get it!....you're making a funny!

HarperLee » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAyricurDKg

Hey BV...

Check out the video
 

HarperLee » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Hey BV...

Check out the video

You can't even give me dates..

So let's go back to what we may have a date for..

Is the video of Biden dealing with May, 2024?
 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

You can't even give me dates..

So let's go back to what we may have a date for..

Is the video of Biden dealing with May, 2024?

**** BV RUNNING AGAIN

Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

You can't even give me dates..

So let's go back to what we may have a date for..

Is the video of Biden dealing with May, 2024?

You want dates?

Within the hour you'll claim that wasn't Biden and there was a person pretending to be Pelosi..

Deal with it BV
Democrats hate Trump so much they'll just lie to the American people

You Tube doesn't really lie 
 

HarperLee » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

You want dates?

Within the hour you'll claim that wasn't Biden and there was a person pretending to be Pelosi..

Deal with it BV
Democrats hate Trump so much they'll just lie to the American people

You Tube doesn't really lie

Yes...

I want dates...

Is the Biden video about May 2024?
 

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Yes...

I want dates...

Is the Biden video about May 2024?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgRGZ9w8DH8

HarperLee » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgRGZ9w8DH8

No dates?

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

No dates?

No clue?
 

HarperLee » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

No clue?

I already asked if it was May, 2024...


You never answered.
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

I already asked if it was May, 2024...

You never answered.

YOU STILL HAVEN'T DEFINED THE TERM WOMAN
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:12 am

President Donald Trump called his sweeping tariffs plan “a very beautiful thing” in a social media post on Sunday night as it continued to roil the world’s economy. Stock markets across the Asia-Pacific region and Europe were trading sharply lower Monday, and U.S. markets are expected to drop again.

“He didn’t process information in any conventional sense,” Wolff writes. “He didn’t read. He didn’t really even skim. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semi-­literate.”

Ah, another day, another Veghead OP where the headline does all the work and the commentary is just a weak side-eye. “A very beautiful thing” followed by global market panic? Bold claim from Grifty, no doubt. But bold commentary from you? Still waiting.

 So here’s a fair question—not that I expect an answer, because we both know how allergic you are to defending your own threads:

If tariffs are such an obvious economic disaster, as you imply, then why haven’t you offered any original economic breakdown—just recycled headlines and your usual hand-wringing sarcasm? What’s your actual position here, besides “I hate Trump, therefore bad”?

 But hey—dodge away. Every time you skip one of my questions, I’ll return the favor on yours. Fair is fair. And right now, you're about 17 dodges deep, so buckle up.
 

Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Ah, another day, another Veghead OP where the headline does all the work and the commentary is just a weak side-eye. “A very beautiful thing” followed by global market panic? Bold claim from Grifty, no doubt. But bold commentary from you? Still waiting.

 So here’s a fair question—not that I expect an answer, because we both know how allergic you are to defending your own threads:

 But hey—dodge away. Every time you skip one of my questions, I’ll return the favor on yours. Fair is fair. And right now, you're about 17 dodges deep, so buckle up.

They shift the demand curve to the left.

Nod.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

They shift the demand curve to the left.

Nod.

Holy ****! Wait....did you just answer the first time? I need time before I continue. I can't believe my **** eyes right now. This is a first since 2017. 

 

Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Holy ****! Wait....did you just answer the first time? I need time before I continue. I can't believe my **** eyes right now. This is a first since 2017.

You're lying.

Again.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

They shift the demand curve to the left.

Nod.

Wow, look who decided to actually answer a question. Sort of. “They shift the demand curve to the left”—congrats on describing a textbook concept in six words and pretending it's a mic drop. That’s not analysis, that’s just the CliffNotes version of Econ 101. A lot like "It's a sampling error."     So let’s go a little deeper since this is your thread and your job is to defend it:

1. What’s causing the shift—decreased consumer confidence, rising input costs, policy uncertainty?
2. Are we looking at a temporary correction or a longer-term signal of weakening demand?
3. How does this tie into broader indicators like job growth, inflation, or global market reaction?

This is what defending your thread looks like—not asking everyone else to fill in the blanks while you toss around vague econ phrases like confetti. You’ve got the floor, Veghead. Make it count—or dodge, and I’ll just keep returning the favor in my threads.
 

Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

You're lying.

Again.

Prove me wrong. 
 
 

Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Wow, look who decided to actually answer a question. Sort of. “They shift the demand curve to the left”—congrats on describing a textbook concept in six words and pretending it's a mic drop. That’s not analysis, that’s just the CliffNotes version of Econ 101. A lot like "It's a sampling error."     So let’s go a little deeper since this is your thread and your job is to defend it:

1. What’s causing the shift—decreased consumer confidence, rising input costs, policy uncertainty?
2. Are we looking at a temporary correction or a longer-term signal of weakening demand?
3. How does this tie into broader indicators like job growth, inflation, or global market reaction?

This is what defending your thread looks like—not asking everyone else to fill in the blanks while you toss around vague econ phrases like confetti. You’ve got the floor, Veghead. Make it count—or dodge, and I’ll just keep returning the favor in my threads.

No.

Let's you answer a question now...
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:21 am

Did you?

https://youtu.be/gj5WFnKEMew?si=TTNVYq4ng0KqayI7