Vegas » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And another dodge and cowardly act. Of course—the real reason you never lead with your own answer is because you’re waiting to “edify” everyone after they take the bait. What a noble scholar you are, Veghead. So generous. So selfless. So utterly full of it.
Let’s be honest—this isn’t about “educating” anyone. It’s about keeping the spotlight on you without ever taking the risk of committing to a position first. Because if you did, you'd actually have to defend something—and we both know that’s where you fold like a cheap lawn chair.
This is your thread. You started it. Your job is to present your point, not wait around like a grumpy game show host judging answers you couldn’t give yourself without Google Maps and a flashlight.
Now go ahead—either answer the actual follow-up or take your place on the growing list of your own unanswered questions.
I show you doing the same thing, and you leave for 5 years.the real reason you never lead with your own answer
On my threads from other members? You got a deal. Other members have respectfully given answers the first time, therefore I return the favor. You don't.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I show you doing the same thing, and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
I'll be here.....been here since you transitioned from Rico Suave to your current Egg Plant status.
Yes....on your threads....Vegas » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ On my threads from other members? You got a deal. Other members have respectfully given answers the first time, therefore I return the favor. You don't.
You leave for 5 years if you can't.
Watch me do just that.Vegas » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Don't you ignore the rest. Your strike through won't change the condition. Deal, only on the condition if you acknowledge the strikethrough.
Period.
No compromise.
I already said twice now, if the rest is considered. Then yes. Otherwise, take your dishonest deals and shove them up your ***.
Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I already said twice now, if the rest is considered. Then yes. Otherwise, take your dishonest deals and shove them up your ***.
Deal?
the real reason you never lead with your own answer
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I show you doing this very thing, and you leave for 5 years...
Deal?
My condition. Third time said now.Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I show you doing this very thing, and you leave for 5 years...
Deal?
Vegas » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I already said twice now, if the rest is considered. Then yes. Otherwise, take your dishonest deals and shove them up your ***.
Deal?
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ there are no "considerations".
Either the rule does, or does not, apply to you.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Blatant projection. If @*VegasVagina doesn't get to have a fair deal, instead of his usual dishonest one, then he wants no part of it. Narcissists will be narcissistsVegas » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable by the way, I am counting all these evasions of yours, due to your tantrum. At this rate, you won't stand a chance of being allowed a question.![]()
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
Blatant projection. If @*VegasVagina doesn't get to have a fair deal, instead of his usual dishonest one, then he wants no part of it. Narcissists will be narcissists
just let this **** wi.
- Control through narrative manipulation: By repeating your words back at you, they attempt to control the conversation and reframe your statements to suit their narrative, no matter how far-fetched.
- Avoidance of original thought: Narcissists often lack the ability—or willingness—to construct thoughtful arguments, so they rely on others’ words to substitute for critical thinking.
- Projection masked as analysis: They project their own flaws onto others by using your past statements as if they were some kind of confession or proof of weakness, despite context.
- Shaming tactic: Quoting your words out of context is used to publicly embarrass or undermine you, not to engage with your point but to assert dominance.
- Ego preservation: They can’t stand losing, so instead of arguing with substance, they dig through your history like it’s a vault of secret weapons—except the weapons are water balloons.
https://thehill.com/policy/internationa ... ations/The European Union is “ready to negotiate” with the United States after issued sweeping tariffs last week, European Commission President stated “This is a major turning point for the United States,” she said. “Nonetheless, we stand ready to negotiate with the United States.” “We have offered zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goodsBlackvegetable » Today, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑ I show you doing the same thing, and you leave for 5 years.
Deal?
RebelGator » Today, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ I'll be here.....been here since you transitioned from Rico Suave to your current Egg Plant status.
"Take THAT, global markets!!!"*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ https://thehill.com/policy/internationa ... ations/The European Union is “ready to negotiate” with the United States after issued sweeping tariffs last week, European Commission President stated “This is a major turning point for the United States,” she said. “Nonetheless, we stand ready to negotiate with the United States.” “We have offered zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goods