Liberal Forum

 

 

righteous » Yesterday, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:33 pm

If Trump is a [[[JWO INSIDER]]] who shot him ...?
That would mean the whole thing was staged,,,dead folks and all.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

If Trump is a [[[JWO INSIDER]]] who shot him ...?
The DNC shot him  with or without the blessing of the [[[JWO]]]
I suppose it doesn't matter to the [[[JWO]]] who ends up carrying out their agenda.
Whatever damage Trump does the the planned Illegal Alien invasion is easily reversed  .

If he ISN'T, why are we on a collision with Iran? Why are we paying to murder children so that israel can get some elbow room?
 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:18 pm

If he ISN'T, why are we on a collision with Iran? Why are we paying to murder children so that israel can get some elbow room?

I've felt that Trump has to play a game of give and take with the [[[JWO]]]
I don't think you have to be a [[[JWO PUPPET]]] to want to prevent  Iran from becoming a nuclear threat.

 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:18 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:18 pm

If he ISN'T, why are we on a collision with Iran? Why are we paying to murder children so that israel can get some elbow room?

trump should implement the leahly law.

---------------------------------------------

• The term “Leahy law” refers to two statutory provisions prohibiting the U.S. Government from using funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces where there is credible information implicating that unit in the commission of gross violations of human rights (GVHR). One statutory provision applies to the State Department and the other applies to the Department of Defense. The State Department Leahy law was made permanent under section 620M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. 2378d. The U.S. government considers torture, extrajudicial killing, enforced disappearance, and rape under color of law as GVHRs when implementing the Leahy law. Incidents are examined on a fact-specific basis. The State Department Leahy law includes an exception permitting resumption of assistance to a unit if the Secretary of State determines and reports to Congress that the government of the country is taking effective steps to bring the responsible members of the security forces unit to justice.

The DoD Leahy law is similar to the State Leahy law. Since 1999, Congress included the DoD Leahy law in its annual appropriations act. The DoD Leahy law is now permanent in Section 362 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code. It requires that DoD-appropriated funds may not be used for any training, equipment, or other assistance for a foreign security force unit if the Secretary of Defense has credible information that such unit has committed a GVHR. The law allows for two exceptions to this restriction. The first in cases where the Secretary of Defense (after consultation with the Secretary of State) determines that the government of that country has taken all necessary corrective steps. This first exception is also known as “remediation.” A second exception exists if U.S. equipment or other assistance is necessary to assist in disaster relief operations or other humanitarian or national security emergencies.
 

---------------2. How is the law implemented?
In cases where an entire unit is designated to receive assistance, the Department of State vets the unit and the unit’s commander. When an individual security force member is nominated for U.S. assistance, the Department vets that individual as well as his or her unit. Vetting begins in the unit’s home country, where the U.S. embassy conducts consular, political, and other security and human rights checks. Most often, an additional review is conducted by analysts at the Department of State in Washington, D.C. The State Department evaluates and assesses available information about the human rights records of the unit and the individual, reviewing a full spectrum of open source and classified records.
When assessing whether information is credible, the following factors should be considered weighing both the credibility of a source and the veracity of an allegation:
Past accuracy and reliability of the reporting source as well as original source, if known;
How the source obtained the information (e.g., personal knowledge obtained by a witness, witness interviews collected by a non-governmental organization (NGO), descriptions collected from government records, etc.);
Known political agenda of a source (both reporting source and/or original source, if known) which might lead to bias in reporting;
Corroborative information to confirm part or all of the allegation;
Information that contradicts part or all of the allegation;
History of unit and known patterns of abuse/professional behavior;
Level of detail of the GVHR allegation, including detail in identification of the GVHR, perpetrator (or link to an operational unit), and victim.
3. Can assistance be reinstated to units previously found ineligible for assistance?
Yes. Consistent with the exception under both Leahy laws, the Departments of State and Defense have adopted a joint policy on remediation that outlines a process for resuming DoD- and State-funded assistance to foreign security force units that are ineligible for assistance under the Leahy laws. This can occur when the Secretaries of Defense and State determine that the government of that country has taken, or is taking, effective measures to bring those responsible to justice. Such measures may include impartial and thorough investigations; credible judicial or administrative adjudications; and appropriate and proportional sentencing.

The Christian Judeo Islamic Love Triangle of Doom.

We gotta get out of this place, or we'll do the last thing we'll ever do.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 1:22 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:22 am

I've felt that Trump has to play a game of give and take with the [[[JWO]]]
I don't think you have to be a [[[JWO PUPPET]]] to want to prevent  Iran from becoming a nuclear threat.

Bro.

They've been playing the "Iran could become a nuclear threat" card since the **** 90s.

You should have to don parachute pants and a fanny pack just to repeat that neocon drivel.

This **** came out in 2012, to breath new life into that discredited excuse for war-by-other-names:

https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/upl ... 052&w=1080
 

Cannonpointer » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Bro.

They've been playing the "Iran could become a nuclear threat" card since the **** 90s.

You should have to don parachute pants and a fanny pack just to repeat that neocon drivel.

This **** came out in 2012, to breath new life into that discredited excuse for war-by-other-names:

https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/upl ... 052&w=1080

Congratulations on destroying Murica


Where do I sign up to lick Putin's Balls?


Can I get any Desi on the side?


https://youtu.be/0NZNUb7lGIA?si=iF-cTMjGribdWztP

Cannonpointer » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

53 minutes ago

Bro.

They've been playing the "Iran could become a nuclear threat" card since the **** 90s.

You should have to don parachute pants and a fanny pack just to repeat that neocon drivel.

This **** came out in 2012, to breath new life into that discredited excuse for war-by-other-names:

https://platform.vox.com/wp-content/upl ... 052&w=1080

OK what do you want to see happen here...?
.
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 1:22 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:22 am

I've felt that Trump has to play a game of give and take with the [[[JWO]]]
I don't think you have to be a [[[JWO PUPPET]]] to want to prevent  Iran from becoming a nuclear threat.

North Korea already has it even publically tested afew.

Right Now got maybe 50/75 "capable" warheads too.

Look to Pakistan North Korea traded "Missle" Technology Pakistan for Nuclear..

Even former Soviet Russia wouldnt give the  Kim "Dynasty" actual Nuclear Weapons but gave them a "Civilian" Reactor Power Plant.

In the 1980s/1990s they figured out how to centrifuge nuclear waste into weapons worthy grade "Plutonium"

TwoIfByTea » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

North Korea already has it even publically tested afew.

Right Now got maybe 50/75 "capable" warheads too.

Look to Pakistan North Korea traded "Missle" Technology Pakistan for Nuclear..

Even former Soviet Russia wouldnt give the  Kim "Dynasty" actual Nuclear Weapons but gave them a "Civilian" Reactor Power Plant.

In the 1980s/1990s they figured out how to centrifuge nuclear waste into weapons worthy grade "Plutonium"

Besides the enriched uranium, the bomb has to have a "self propagating" design that creates a chain  of ever intensifying reactions.so that the bomb can achieve maximum efficiency. 
That's where  such mind blowing genius had to be called on to design a device that would be pretty hard to troubleshoot if the first attempts didn't live up to the expected output.
I have never heard how many trial runs it took to get the bomb designs finalized and "ready for issue".
 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:19 pm

Besides the enriched uranium, the bomb has to have a "self propagating" design that creates a chain  of ever intensifying reactions.so that the bomb can achieve maximum efficiency. 
That's where  such mind blowing genius had to be called on to design a device that would be pretty hard to troubleshoot if the first attempts didn't live up to the expected output.
I have never heard how many trial runs it took to get the bomb designs finalized and "ready for issue".

In reality only the United States has ever used "NUCLEAR" Bombs back in WW2 against Japan bombed afew cities into oblivion too..

Now Russia "possess" even more warheads and missles than we do.

But during the "Cold War" was an unwritten deal "Mutally Assured Destruction" none was ever fired off.

Afew "Close Calls" but no actuall Nuclear War neither
 

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:16 pm

Congratulations on destroying Murica

Where do I sign up to lick Putin's Balls?

Can I get any Desi on the side?

Oh, look - a little neocon warpig bitch, whining because the wrong neocon is in charge of pushing the policies he defends. 

You're just a weak queer whose brain is owned by other men. 
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:53 pm

OK what do you want to see happen here...?
.

I want people to stop pretending that Iran is 5 minutes away from a nuke. That got old under Clinton - sorry.

I want people to stop pretending that Russia would make its own nuclear standing less prodigious by just giving a **** nuke to a client state - as no nuclear power has done EVER. 

I want the based to remain based - not fall for yet another evil, on-the-cusp-of-going-nuclear, insane regime. I want the based to stop pretending that the Iranian government is crazier and more dangerous that NK - which has a **** nuke. 

I want the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Palestinians and the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Houthis and the anti-Persian money we are spending to continue the GENERATIONAL torture of Iranians converted to responsibly following through on the perfectly manageable promise of Social Security. 

I want YOU to stop pretending that Iran is the bad guy. It feeds into the bibi nutsinyouboo narrative. Iran is not an evil empire. It WAS a **** western style democracy, until we overthrew that when it was found Iran was sitting right on top of BP's oil. Then it became a torture prison until our hand-picked dictator got sick and lost control. Now it's a regime that has to deal with relentless attacks against its sovereignty - relentless attempts to get it back under America's thumb. 
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:52 am

I want people to stop pretending that Iran is 5 minutes away from a nuke. That got old under Clinton - sorry.

I want people to stop pretending that Russia would make its own nuclear standing less prodigious by just giving a **** nuke to a client state - as no nuclear power has done EVER. 

I want the based to remain based - not fall for yet another evil, on-the-cusp-of-going-nuclear, insane regime. I want the based to stop pretending that the Iranian government is crazier and more dangerous that NK - which has a **** nuke. 

I want the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Palestinians and the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Houthis and the anti-Persian money we are spending to continue the GENERATIONAL torture of Iranians converted to responsibly following through on the perfectly manageable promise of Social Security. 

I want YOU to stop pretending that Iran is the bad guy. It feeds into the bibi nutsinyouboo narrative. Iran is not an evil empire. It WAS a **** western style democracy, until we overthrew that when it was found Iran was sitting right on top of BP's oil. Then it became a torture prison until our hand-picked dictator got sick and lost control. Now it's a regime that has to deal with relentless attacks against its sovereignty - relentless attempts to get it back under America's thumb.

I want tRump to stop being in the stupid wars

like he said he was going to do

and stop being proud of stupid **** like this

https://youtu.be/-peYuaWvckU?si=BTabsmcN6InznUlR
 
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:52 am

I want people to stop pretending that Iran is 5 minutes away from a nuke. That got old under Clinton - sorry.

I want people to stop pretending that Russia would make its own nuclear standing less prodigious by just giving a **** nuke to a client state - as no nuclear power has done EVER. 

I want the based to remain based - not fall for yet another evil, on-the-cusp-of-going-nuclear, insane regime. I want the based to stop pretending that the Iranian government is crazier and more dangerous that NK - which has a **** nuke. 

I want the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Palestinians and the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Houthis and the anti-Persian money we are spending to continue the GENERATIONAL torture of Iranians converted to responsibly following through on the perfectly manageable promise of Social Security. 

I want YOU to stop pretending that Iran is the bad guy. It feeds into the bibi nutsinyouboo narrative. Iran is not an evil empire. It WAS a **** western style democracy, until we overthrew that when it was found Iran was sitting right on top of BP's oil. Then it became a torture prison until our hand-picked dictator got sick and lost control. Now it's a regime that has to deal with relentless attacks against its sovereignty - relentless attempts to get it back under America's thumb.

According to what I've read Iran has enriched Uranium that they mined and processed all by themselves.
There is no peaceful use for enriched uranium to 60%  that I'm aware of........https://armscontrolcenter.org/uranium-e ... r-weapons/
I don't know how you can be so sure that they haven't some how gleaned the knowledge to assemble a nuclear bomb.

 

Cannonpointer » Today, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:52 am

I want people to stop pretending that Iran is 5 minutes away from a nuke. That got old under Clinton - sorry.

I want people to stop pretending that Russia would make its own nuclear standing less prodigious by just giving a **** nuke to a client state - as no nuclear power has done EVER. 

I want the based to remain based - not fall for yet another evil, on-the-cusp-of-going-nuclear, insane regime. I want the based to stop pretending that the Iranian government is crazier and more dangerous that NK - which has a **** nuke. 

I want the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Palestinians and the anti-Semite money we are spending to murder Houthis and the anti-Persian money we are spending to continue the GENERATIONAL torture of Iranians converted to responsibly following through on the perfectly manageable promise of Social Security. 

I want YOU to stop pretending that Iran is the bad guy. It feeds into the bibi nutsinyouboo narrative. Iran is not an evil empire. It WAS a **** western style democracy, until we overthrew that when it was found Iran was sitting right on top of BP's oil. Then it became a torture prison until our hand-picked dictator got sick and lost control. Now it's a regime that has to deal with relentless attacks against its sovereignty - relentless attempts to get it back under America's thumb.

Soviet Union Russia never gave them actuall nuclear warheads but established Nuclear Power plants with Comme-con allies.

But each of these plants generates "Spent Waste".

A way of cetrifugue was created constantly reformulating Nuclear Waste into War-Head grade plutonium.

Pakistan and its conflict with India being their primary motivation seek nuclear weapons somewhat perfected this technology but had no missles.

North Korea had a missle industry but no nuclear knowledge just a former Soviet constructed power plant.

They traded North Korean missles for Pakistan nuclear capability.

Took the North Koreans another decade or two actually test a nuclear bomb and that initial test was 2005/2006 afew decades ago already.

Then they kept going and CIA estimates are that they posses 50/75 actual warheads roughly about same as Israel.

Nothing compared what we have & posses but just enough pop to create Vast Devastation on a very Global Scale and who knows how many more they have built and stockpiled since then.