Liberal Forum

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:11 pm

The strike-through tantrum again? At this point it’s less a rhetorical device and more of a cry for formatting help. It’s adorable how you think a crossed-out reply somehow deletes the original point—or your 51 unanswered questions.

No sharting.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:12 pm

No aharting.

       Your strikethroughs remind me of when you omit the question mark on your questions. You think it negates it as a question. 

Likewise, you genuinely believe that your strikethroughs negate my points of handing you your ***.   

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:14 pm

       Your strikethroughs remind me of when you omit the question mark on your questions. You think it negates it as a question. 

Likewise, you genuinely believe that your strikethroughs negate my points of handing you your ***. 

Your endless evasions remind me of your abject cowardice.

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:15 pm

Your endless evasions remind me of your abject cowardice.

Ah yes, the projection has entered full bloom. Your 51 unanswered questions, your refusal to defend your own OPs, your constant deflections—somehow that’s my cowardice now? That’s rich. If projection were an Olympic sport, you’d already be banned for dominating too hard.

Blatant projection means that Mary has entered. Now it's time to draw out nuclear Nancy.     

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:19 pm

Ah yes, the projection has entered full bloom. Your 51 unanswered questions, your refusal to defend your own OPs, your constant deflections—somehow that’s my cowardice now? That’s rich. If projection were an Olympic sport, you’d already be banned for dominating too hard.

Blatant projection means that Mary has entered. Now it's time to draw out nuclear Nancy.   

For whose benefit is the commentary?
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:20 pm

For whose benefit is the commentary?

52

      You are so god damn **** stupid. 

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:20 pm

For whose benefit is the commentary?

You strike out text the way you strike out in arguments—early and often.

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:24 pm

You strike out text the way you strike out in arguments—early and often.

That doesn't address the question....again 

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:23 pm

52

      You are so god damn **** stupid.

No answer.
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:39 pm

That doesn't address the question....again

55

And the projection just keep coming. 

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:41 pm

55

And the projection just keep coming.

But you've had questions answered.

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:46 pm

But you've had questions answered.

Please tell me you are not boasting about 1 out of 5, to which you never answered the first time anyway. 

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:49 pm

Please tell me you are not boasting about 1 out of 5, to which you never answered the first time anyway.

In the context of your 0 for Infinity, it's positively heroic.

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 2:39 pm

In the context of your 0 for Infinity, it's positively heroic.

Are these my words?

And now, a brief reminder for @Blackvegetable  
You’ve dodged over 50 questions in your own threads. Until that changes, I’ll be dodging yours just as often. That’s called balance. Start answering, or stop demanding. Coward. Moron. retard. Loser. Punk. Imbecile. ****-for-brains. 

Nod. 

1. You will continue to pretend that you never saw this. 

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 3:12 pm

Are these my words?

Nod. 

1. You will continue to pretend that you never saw this.

It's irrelevant..

You are Zero for Infinity.

Clearly your rules don't apply to you.

Making you a.  
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 3:38 pm

It's irrelevant..

You are Zero for Infinity.

Clearly your rules don't apply to you.

Making you a.

It's absolutely relevant. You insist that your questions are answered, but you don't have to answer ****? 

Pound sand with that, narcissist boy. 

That is how it will be. Fair is fair. Period. 

Now shut up. 


1. You will now go right to that one answer that you never answered the first time, while still deliberately ignoring all of your dodges. More evidence that rules don't apply to you. narcissistic pos. 
 

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 3:38 pm

It's irrelevant..

You are Zero for Infinity.

Clearly your rules don't apply to you.

Making you a.

Step 4 for about 60 times now.. You have proved my prediction more times than I can count. 

Step 1 - check
Step 2- check
Step 3- check
Step 4 - check for the last 60 times. 

Step 1: I ask you a direct question
Step 2: You deflect with a smug question of your own
Step 3: I remind you of the original question
Step 4: You accuse me of evading while continuing to dodge

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 1:20 pm

For whose benefit is the commentary?

  he reminds me of another poster that used to say “watch this folks”

like he has an audience i  

Vegas » 08 Apr 2025, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 3:44 pm

Step 4 for about 60 times now.. You have proved my prediction more times than I can count. 

Step 1 - check
Step 2- check
Step 3- check
Step 4 - check for the last 60 times. 

Zero for Infinity Level 0.16s should kill themselves, don't you think?

Blackvegetable » 08 Apr 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑

08 Apr 2025, 7:04 am

Grifty has plans to eliminate the federal income tax (which, though he didn't pay it, was a disincentive to losing more of other people's momey), and raise 700 billion through tariffs.

Apparently the EU called his bluff, and proposed some zero-tariff regime.

“We have offered zero-for-zero tariffs for industrial goods as we have successfully done with many other trading partners. Because Europe is always ready for a good deal. So we keep it on the table,” she told a press conference alongside Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre. 

The U.S. and EU came close to scrapping industrial tariffs a decade ago in their discussions of the TTIP — the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership — that was ultimately scuppered by Trump in his first term.

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-offe ... l-tariffs/

With tariffs at 0, there would be no revenue to finance a tax cut.

So how would Grifty finance his tax cuts?

With a tax cut, of course.

Duh.

I heard this morning that their may be  a mechanism we can implement tax free surcharges if the price changes due to the Trumpocalypse.

The Trade War is hitting my industry hard.  Workers are sitting with idle hands waiting for the devil to say "Good Luck"

Who the eff collects the money at the ports? Newsome discussed just giving an eff you to the feds.