If it was in your pants I think you would know it.
---------------------------------golfboy » 20 Apr 2025, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ So you are saying here that his lawyers lied to the court when they said that his life would be in danger by a "rival gang"?
How do you have a "rival gang" if you're not a gang member.
And why does he have MS13 tattooed on his knuckles?
JohnnyYou » 20 Apr 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Just keep on flying our chopper into oblivion. The bytch is gonna end up on auto-rotate and the fuselage will be the thing spinning.
Apparently you didn't realize CASA's a South American run Marxist organization...JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 12:52 am » wrote: ↑ Don;t worry ROG.. When dems regain control I will make sure you don't end up on the list for the Mars Penal Colony. I will not support the Dems making Elon richer with contracts for the facility.
I guess we can deport people wherever the phook we want to. At least we aren't putting them in gas chambers and crematoriums
“CASA is outraged that ICE deported CASA member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia in violation of a court order and at grave personal danger. In 2019, a judge issued an order prohibiting the government from deporting Kilmar to El Salvador based on the risk of persecution Kilmar would confront if returned to El Salvador. That order still stands. Yet, in an act that they now refer to as an “administrative error”, ICE ignored that court order, and disappeared him into a notorious Salvadoran prison. Kilmar joined three planeloads of deportees; many of whom – like Kilmar – have never been charged with a crime.
https://wearecasa.org/casa-demands-just ... go-garcia/
then there's this...JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 12:52 am » wrote: ↑ Don;t worry ROG.. When dems regain control I will make sure you don't end up on the list for the Mars Penal Colony. I will not support the Dems making Elon richer with contracts for the facility.
I guess we can deport people wherever the phook we want to. At least we aren't putting them in gas chambers and crematoriums
“CASA is outraged that ICE deported CASA member Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia in violation of a court order and at grave personal danger. In 2019, a judge issued an order prohibiting the government from deporting Kilmar to El Salvador based on the risk of persecution Kilmar would confront if returned to El Salvador. That order still stands. Yet, in an act that they now refer to as an “administrative error”, ICE ignored that court order, and disappeared him into a notorious Salvadoran prison. Kilmar joined three planeloads of deportees; many of whom – like Kilmar – have never been charged with a crime.
https://wearecasa.org/casa-demands-just ... go-garcia/
True chromosomes or true syllables about character matters and generation gaps don't count daily here. Funny thing about defining a day separate ways a week by linear time indexing the past against current events midnight to noon dawn to dusk.jerra b » 20 Apr 2025, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ trump supporters hate the truth. absolutely hate it.
An immigration judge barred Abrego Garcia from being sent to El Salvador, saying he proved he had a “well-founded fear of future persecution” from local gangs. The court granted withholding of removal as long as he checked in with authorities annually, something he attested to doing in court filings. This gave him legal status in the United States temporarily and allowed him to receive a work permit.ICE did not appeal, and Abrego Garcia was released. He returned to his family, where he resumed working and began a five-year apprenticeship program to become a licensed journeyman, his wife wrote in an affidavit.“We really believed that the false accusations had been cleared up and that they were behind us,” she wrote.
You would have been very popular at Ellis Island back in the day...ROG62 » Yesterday, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ then there's this...
As in the case of asylum, a person who is granted withholding of removal is protected from being returned to his or her home country and receives the right to remain in the United States and work legally. But at the end of the court process, an immigration judge enters a deportation order and then tells the government they cannot execute that order. That is, the “removal” to a person’s home country is “withheld.” However, the government is still allowed to deport that person to a different country if the other country agrees to accept them.
Withholding of removal provides a form of protection that is less certain than asylum, leaving its recipients in a sort of limbo. A person who is granted withholding of removal may never leave the United States without executing that removal order, cannot petition to bring family members to the United States, and does not gain a path to citizenship. And unlike asylum, when a family seeks withholding of removal together a judge may grant protection to the parent while denying it to the children, leading to family separation.
Withholding of removal also does not offer permanent protection or a path to permanent residence. If conditions improve in a person’s home country, the government can revoke withholding of removal and again seek the person’s deportation. This can occur even years after a person is granted protection.
https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil. ... of-removal
Yeah, that isn't what it means. That's how it is often applied.JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 1:07 am » wrote: ↑ If it was in your pants I think you would know it.
At first I was wondering who Rep Ipsa Lokeeter was...
Thanks for sharing your crystal ball.
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
res ip·sa lo·qui·tur
/ˌrās ˌipsə ˈläkwədər,ˌrās ˌipsə ˈlōkwədər/
noun
Law
- the principle that the occurrence of an accident implies negligence.
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that isn't what it means. That's how it is often applied.
What it MEANS is: The thing speaks for itself. As your post did, where I cut it off. You were engaging in a level of inauthenticity and saccharine insincerity that would gag any self-respecting maggot.
Says who?
There was no pandemic under Biden.JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 12:45 am » wrote: ↑ The Dow Jones Industrial Index did fine under them.
Any pandemic debt would have been incurred by whoever was in office.
Do you want to tell me how great this Trump economy is?
Wow. Just when I think you can't say something more stupid than you said yesterday.
His lawyers said in public that he isn't a gang member. That means NOTHING.jerrab » Yesterday, 4:35 am » wrote: ↑ ---------------------------------
The Justice Department shared records, not previously made public, detailing how police officers in Maryland assessed Abrego Garcia was a member of the MS-13 gang during an arrest in 2019. He had no criminal history at the time, which the documents also state, and his attorneys have denied that he is a gang member.
I have a lot of graphs that say otherwise.golfboy » Yesterday, 7:40 pm » wrote: ↑ There was no pandemic under Biden.
It was already over.
That didn't stop him from accelerating spending.
Why would you disparage the Statue of Liberty? What part of being here ILLEGALLY don't you understand?JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 5:00 pm » wrote: ↑ You would have been very popular at Ellis Island back in the day...
The Oyster Lords in the Chesapeake would have been pissed you cut off their source of free labor.
Why don't we cut off the head of the Statue of Liberty and put a Trump Bobble Head on it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDl3bdE3YQA