Liberal Forum

Report to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives

This report covers participation in the 2019 World Military Games in Wuhan, China specifically related to questions posed in section 1068 of the NDAA for FY 2022. Answers to the questions are provided below. The number of United States athletes and staff who attended the 2019 World Military Games and became ill with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-like symptoms during or shortly after their return to the United States.


The U.S. delegation included 263 total participants (173 athletes and 90 coaches and staff) of whom 219 were military personnel. The Department of Defense (DoD) has concluded through correspondence with the Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force, and United States of America Medical Director in charge of the safety and health of the participants in the 2019 World Military Games, that 7 Service members who attended the games exhibited COVID-19- like signs and/or symptoms during the timeframe of October 18, 2019 through January 21, 2020. The COVID-19-like symptoms could have been caused by other respiratory infections. All 7 Service members' symptoms resolved within 6 days.


https://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploa ... port-1.pdf

By the way, the Biden Admin hid this report.  By law they should have posted it.  

*Huey » 11 Apr 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2025, 9:26 am

This is your point.  If you can't it will PG for you.

It's the conclusion of the citation in your OP.

Do you consider it irrelevant? 
 

*Huey » 11 Apr 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2025, 9:26 am

This is your point.  If you can't make it will be PG for you.

I was PG'd for asking about the conclusion of the study cited in the OP?

I think you just made my point.


Again.
 

Blackvegetable » 11 Apr 2025, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2025, 5:08 pm

I was PG'd for asking about the conclusion of the study cited in the OP?

I think you just made my point.

Again.

you were PG’d for your inability to make your own point, demanding others do your work, and for attempting to control the discussion.

You are getting PG’d now as well.

I think if the OP omits the conclusions of the study cited in the OP that he is a lying ******.


But that's just me.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Apr 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2025, 1:36 pm

That seems like a very poor endorsement for forced vaccinations...!   No wonder why they tried to hide the truth.... 

The OP is hiding this truth....


 

@Blackvegetable  

Moron, if the Op wanted to omit facts a **** link would not have been provided.

******* cowardly ****, if you want the conclusion posted, (it is not much different then what is in the Op, ******* **** wannabe) post it with your argument.

All else will be sent to PG, Cowardly Too Far.
 

*Huey » 11 Apr 2025, 6:42 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2025, 6:42 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Moron, if the Op wanted to omit facts a **** link would not have been provided.

******* cowardly ****, if you want the conclusion posted, (it is not much different then what is in the Op, ******* **** wannabe) post it with your argument.

All else will be sent to PG, Cowardly Too Far.

So why does the Moron OP censor the post quoting the conclusions of the study cited, verbatim?

I call MASSIVE THREAD FAIL DUE TO MORON.

Blackvegetable » 11 Apr 2025, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Apr 2025, 7:19 pm

So why does the Moron OP censor the post quoting the conclusions of the study cited, verbatim?

I call MASSIVE THREAD FAIL DUE TO MORON.

No case yet.  Bye.

THIS THREAD IS A MASSIVE LIE BY OMISSION.

OP SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 5:42 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 5:42 am

THIS THREAD IS A MASSIVE LIE BY OMISSION.

OP SHOULD BE DEPORTED.

YOU'RE A MASSIVE LIE BY OMISSION.

YOU SHOULD BE DEPORTED.
 

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 8:40 am

Your point is what, exactly?

That's obvious...

The more relevant question is what your point is....
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 8:59 am

That's obvious...

The more relevant question is what your point is....

no point, back to PG.

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 9:03 am

That your pointless OP lies by omission.

If wanted to lie I would not have post the link, a bitch.  

My Op says 7 military athletes came down with COVID LIKE Symptons. in 2019.  That is not a lie, Bitch. There was NO testing available.

Postm the lie, Bitch.

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 9:07 am

If wanted to lie I would not have post the link, a bitch.  

My Op says 7 military athletes came down with COVID LIKE Symptons. in 2019.  That is not a lie, Bitch. There was NO testing available.

Postm the lie, Bitch.

But that can't be your "point".

If you lie by omission, I can't post what you didn't. 


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 9:08 am

But that can't be your "point".

If you lie by omission, I can't post what you didn't.

back to Pg.  I provided a link.  Now you are just being a bitch.

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 9:07 am

If wanted to lie I would not have post the link, a bitch.  

My Op says 7 military athletes came down with COVID LIKE Symptons. in 2019.  That is not a lie, Bitch. There was NO testing available.

Postm the lie, Bitch.

What's the point of the OP?

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 9:14 am

What's the point of the OP?

Sorry, that’s A question, not your point.  Pg for you.

Can anyone tell me the point of this OP?

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 9:40 am

Anyone besides me find it odd that 7 military athletes became seriously ill with COVID LIKE SYMPTOMS in Wuhan in 2019?

What does the study cited conclude about it?