Liberal Forum

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'


California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 10:51 am

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'

California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

How reliable have FOX reports of DOGE been?

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 11:54 am

How reliable have FOX reports of DOGE been?

This isn’t about Fox.  You can either post facts that dispute the DOGE claims or keep getting sent  to PG.

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 10:51 am

Now, the billionaire is pointing the finger at California, New York and Massachusetts, claiming they are responsible for receiving the bulk of the fraudulent funds - $305 million, to be exact, Fox News reported.

'There's a reason for the mass exodus from Democrat-run states that have mismanaged their economies and driven residents to the nearest Republican-led state,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields told the outlet. 

'High taxes, poor stewardship of taxpayer dollars and progressive policies continue to yield negative results, which is why Americans overwhelmingly support the work of DOGE.'

California bore a significant share of the misuse, as the agency said the West Coast state was responsible for a staggering 68 percent of unemployment benefits.

 According to DOGE, these payments - some made to individuals on the terrorist watchlist or with criminal records - occurred during Joe Biden's presidency. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... fraud.html

Ca, Ny and Ma.  WTF is going on in those states.

Given the record of DOGE, and FOX''s readiness to recatapult propaganda uncritically, how much faith - if any - should we place in your 3rd hand report?

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 11:59 am

If anyone has any actual facts that dispute the DOGE claims bring them on. This is not bout sources.

What if the sources are notoriously unreliable? 

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 11:59 am

If anyone has any actual facts that dispute the DOGE claims bring them on. This is not bout sources.

Are these your words?

Bitch, you would throw a hissy fit if someone on the right used an opinion piece.  You are being told what to think

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 12:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 12:13 pm

What if the sources are notoriously unreliable?

Post the information that disputes the article.

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 3:19 pm

Dude, there is no context where you could kick my ***.  You know what I look like. you know my address, you know my name.  Stop **** talking and get her done, ******.

Suffolk Va, baby.  You have the mad saved.  Stop talking and show me what you got, Bitch.

1917 Piedmont Rd 23435 in case you forgot. Whenever you are ready, Punk *** Bitch, come on down.


I think you should PG your meltdown


And your stalky melty pm

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 3:25 pm

1917 Piedmont Rd 23435 in case you forgot. Whenever you are ready, Punk *** Bitch, come on down.

I think you should PG your meltdown

And your stalky melty pm

Lmao!  You did not have permission to post that.  But, no problem.  You are a ******, less than a man, and will not act on it.

You did EXACTLY what I knew you would.  I own you, Bitch:
 

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 4:03 pm

Lmao!  You did not have permission to post that.  But, no problem.  You are a ******, less than a man, and will not act on it.

You did EXACTLY what I knew you would.  I own you, Bitch:

Tiny,

You are melting down because I've exposed you as FOX's rube TWICE in one day.
 

All democrats should be thrown into active volcanos.

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 4:09 pm

Tiny,

You are melting down because I've exposed you as FOX's rube TWICE in one day.

You haven't done ****, Bitch.  You have my address.  Let me know when you are coming, Bitch.  I own you.  I am the puppet master.  You post where I want you to post. You are too **** easy, Cowardly Too Far.  

           I'm out.  I will leave you to your towel and handcrean, Han lotion Solo.  

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 3:25 pm

1917 Piedmont Rd 23435 in case you forgot. Whenever you are ready, Punk *** Bitch, come on down.

I think you should PG your meltdown

And your stalky melty pm

lol…

*Huey » 12 Apr 2025, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 5:32 pm

You haven't done ****, Bitch.  You have my address.  Let me know when you are coming, Bitch.  I own you.  I am the puppet master.  You post where I want you to post. You are too **** easy, Cowardly Too Far.  

           I'm out.  I will leave you to your towel and handcrean, Han lotion Solo.

That's why I have backed off from getting into with him. It is the same, tired rhetoric everyday. 

I know, right?

*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Apr 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2025, 9:43 am

Now you think you're being clever by posting irrelevant  math equations......

This is where you complain, bitterly, about the state of education in America...

*GHETTOBLASTER » 13 Apr 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2025, 10:16 am

A classic example of SOUR GRAPES is what we have here folks.^^^^^^^^^^
BV would rather root for fraud to go unpunished than to see it get rooted out by the party he isn't man enough to be a part of

Post your numbers, and sources.

I would like to express my gratitude to management for running off the bounder responsible for this ****, thoroughly debunked, thread.

Blackvegetable » 12 Apr 2025, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Apr 2025, 4:09 pm

Tiny,

You are melting down because I've exposed you as FOX's rube TWICE in one day.

I watch more F1 than Fox. ****** 

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

So what is your point?  In your new post, provide, in your own words your point and stand or this conversation will be PGed as waste of my time.

Now, have you shown your daughter your only e behavior yet?

Wait....

You lied.

Now you run behind the tired

So what is your point?

followed by a demand that I explain the citation you haven't read.

But you're not done **** yourself..

Now, have you shown your daughter your only e behavior yet?

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Wait....

You lied.

Now you run behind the tired

followed by a demand that I explain the citation you haven't read.

But you're not done **** yourself..

There is no point.  Bye,