The truth is not one single [[[MSM]]] news network touched your totally ridiculous photo [that obviously looks nothing like Trump] with a 10 foot pole......Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The truth is that it is Sweet, Sweet Donnie...
The Truth doesn't give a **** about your gay panic.
All you have to do is rent the movie and take a screenshot....*GHETTOBLASTER » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The truth is not one single [[[MSM]]] news network touched your totally ridiculous photo [that obviously looks nothing like Trump] with a 10 foot pole......
Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ All you have to do is rent the movie and take a screenshot....
You can also stamp your feet, I guess...*GHETTOBLASTER » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑Please keep posting that totally ridiculous photo....you're doing GOD's WORK every time you do......
Why...?
Keep yammering about "truth".*GHETTOBLASTER » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Please keep posting that totally ridiculous photo....you're doing GOD's WORK every time you do......
any guy who refers to themselves as "cute" is either a ***, ******, drag queen or wannabe woman ....any wagers?
C'mon man, his "captions"...*GHETTOBLASTER » Yesterday, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ How many years did he post that photo before he finally decided it was time to tell us what he thinks that is a photo of...?
Nobody else had a clue WTF that is a photo of......![]()
That's what's so ridiculously funny ....he finally had to tell us what he thinks that photo shows,
How delusional can anyone get...?
Well he also thinks ****** are just as intelligent, no more prone to committing murder, [including matricide / infanticide] and no more prone to taking dumps in public than any of the other races too..![]()
^^^ clings like **** to a dog's ***...Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The truth is that it is Sweet, Sweet Donnie...
The Truth doesn't give a **** about your gay panic.
That photo originally belonged to another tabloid, [not VF] yet the original owners never claimed it was Trump..
You're a **** moron.*Beekeeper » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Here's what's so **** FUNNY about BV's claim that "this is attributed" when he doesn't even know what that means!!
THAT MEANS, the PHOTO IS ATTRIBUTED TO THE PHOTOGRAPHER and nothing more. Which, in simple COMMON SENSE TERMS, says "This is the name of the photographer that took this photograph" and NOTHING more.
So, BV, you wanna go a round or 3 on this one too?? BECAUSE, it's a PHOTOGRAPH of Roy Cohn and some UNNAMED individuals standing beside and near him. NOT TO MENTION that it's NEVER been verified as being "Trump" as you and Vanity Fair, that "WE HATE TRUMP" RAG, likes to claim.
UNTIL you get some CORROBORATION on this photograph, which there IS NONE TO BE FOUND, it's just the same **** you love to suck up to and then spread on your sammich.
Run along pettycoat and keep sucking that THUMB!!
There's some serious gay panic.
After several years of posting your photo with no reactions at all....
Blackvegetable » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You're a **** moron.
Who would best know who the subjects are?
you're the one who seems to be in "gay panic", cutie...
I'm not breaking down over a photo, Rog.
If DOGE uncovered even 1 million in fraud - we can all be sure its DEMOCRAT FRAUD. Democrats steal money from innocent taxpayers to enrich themselves. I know this. Everyone on this forum knows this. Now, you know this. And, the world knows this. Try and get that genie with a supers-sized Stacy Abrams booty back in the bottle!!!Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/p ... vings.html
DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress
Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.
Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.
That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.
Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..
Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.
G'ddammn are they **** stupid..
How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?
Seriously..
There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...
Skans » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If DOGE uncovered even 1 million in fraud - we can all be sure its DEMOCRAT FRAUD. Democrats steal money from innocent taxpayers to enrich themselves. I know this. Everyone on this forum knows this. Now, you know this. And, the world knows this. Try and get that genie with a supers-sized Stacy Abrams booty back in the bottle!!!
"DAMN! MY BIG FAT GOVERNMENT-FED ***
WON'T FIT BACK IN DAT GENIE BOTTLE"
Skans,we can all be sure its DEMOCRAT FRAUD. Democrats steal money from innocent taxpayers to enrich themselves. I know this. Everyone on this forum knows this.