Liberal Forum

BuckNaked » 17 Apr 2025, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:55 am

Who are they?

Skans » 15 Apr 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Apr 2025, 8:44 am

The Bottom Line......DOGE IS KILLING-OFF DEMOCRATS!

31stArrival » 17 Apr 2025, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 6:18 pm

inaccurate. DOGE exposes how the democrats are destroying themselves and people of character never saw it coming.

murdock » 17 Apr 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:56 am

Only one I know of is cannonpointer.
 
 

murdock » 17 Apr 2025, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 9:17 am

No, I can assure you I don't lay around with **** on my face. That image was placed by the juvenile *** running this place in a show of the extreme power they wield.

If it matters, I am a Caucasian. They say I am of Irish descent, and it must be true because I really like potatoes!

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

31stArrival » 18 Apr 2025, 5:33 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 5:33 am

the difference between knowing what you believe true and understanding personal time alive as eternally separated as one of a kind daily here are two different scenarios where one is self evident and the other 24/7 practice of never accepting all you been since a fertilized cell after birth.

murdock » 18 Apr 2025, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 6:27 am

You need to be removed you **** puking cocksucker!

Please burn alive you **** up piece of ****!

31stArrival » 18 Apr 2025, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

18 Apr 2025, 7:35 am

Power to persuade is lost to your we mentality being better than me equally occupying time with a beating heart same as you exist in plain sight denying why you exist since conceived.

Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/p ... vings.html

DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress

Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.

 Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

 That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.

Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..

Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.

G'ddammn are they **** stupid..

How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?

Seriously..

There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...

Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2025, 8:20 am

 
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/24/us/p ... -cuts.html

so **** g'ddammned stupid

Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2025, 8:20 am

Now that the dealin's done...


What Elon Musk Didn’t Budget For: Firing Workers Costs Money, Too 

An expert on the federal work force estimates that the speed and chaos of Mr. Musk’s cuts to the bureaucracy will cost taxpayers $135 billion this fiscal year....


Neither of these estimates includes the cost to taxpayers of defending DOGE’s moves in court. Of about 200 lawsuits and appeals related to Mr. Trump’s agenda, at least 30 implicate the department. “Not only is Musk vastly overinflating the money he has saved, he is not accounting for the exponentially larger waste that he is creating,” said Max Stier, the chief executive of the Partnership for Public Service. “He’s inflicted these costs on the American people, who will pay them for many years to come.” 


Mr. Stier and other experts on the federal work force said it did not have to be this way. Federal law and previous government shutdowns offered Mr. Musk a legal playbook for reducing the federal work force, a goal that most Americans support.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/24/us/p ... -cuts.html


so **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/p ... vings.html

DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress

Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.

 Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

 That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.

Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..

Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.

G'ddammn are they **** stupid..

How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?

Seriously..

There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...

Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/p ... vings.html

DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress

Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.

 Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

 That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.

Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..

Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.

G'ddammn are they **** stupid..

How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?

Seriously..

There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2025, 8:20 am

Now that the dealin's done...

What Elon Musk Didn’t Budget For: Firing Workers Costs Money, Too 

An expert on the federal work force estimates that the speed and chaos of Mr. Musk’s cuts to the bureaucracy will cost taxpayers $135 billion this fiscal year....

Neither of these estimates includes the cost to taxpayers of defending DOGE’s moves in court. Of about 200 lawsuits and appeals related to Mr. Trump’s agenda, at least 30 implicate the department. “Not only is Musk vastly overinflating the money he has saved, he is not accounting for the exponentially larger waste that he is creating,” said Max Stier, the chief executive of the Partnership for Public Service. “He’s inflicted these costs on the American people, who will pay them for many years to come.” 

Mr. Stier and other experts on the federal work force said it did not have to be this way. Federal law and previous government shutdowns offered Mr. Musk a legal playbook for reducing the federal work force, a goal that most Americans support.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/24/us/p ... -cuts.html

so **** g'ddammned stupid

*31stArrival » 25 Apr 2025, 12:05 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Apr 2025, 12:05 pm

Imagine that, humanity has a catch 22 for everything socially going forward.

Blackvegetable » 13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

13 Apr 2025, 4:58 am

no spam

DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress

Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously  no spam  his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.

 Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

 That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.

Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..

Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.

G'ddammn are they **** stupid..

How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?

Seriously..

There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...

BuckNaked » 24 Sep 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2025, 2:52 pm

is that sustainable?

BuckNaked » 24 Sep 2025, 2:52 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Sep 2025, 2:52 pm

is that sustainable?

murdock » 17 Apr 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:56 am

Only one I know of is cannonpointer.