Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

brown, gauging by your OP, you make a double lobotomy patient look like Einstein...

How so, JuCo? 

ROG62 » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

saving taxpayer's $$$ by rooting out the ****...

What's the largest part of the discretionary budget?

Blackvegetable » Today, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/p ... vings.html

DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress

Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.

 Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

 That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.

Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..

Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.

G'ddammn are they **** stupid..

How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?

Seriously..

There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...

Who cares? They are a non-government entity offering advice.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:49 pm

How so, JuCo?

Enjoy spending the next 4 years  celebrating  DOGE's failure to root out all of the waste and  corruption that they hoped they could.

Those of us who love America will celebrate every single dollars worth of waste and fraud they uncover.

This is the America that DOPE HEADS like BV enabled  and it has sat right in his back yard all the way through Biden's term.
How embarrassing Dude.
Might as well say you love living in El Salvador or Bangladesh     ..........https://youtu.be/8-HcRPPWi_4?si=xLHX1YXG9yH3zflC


 

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:50 pm

What's the largest part of the discretionary budget?

irrelevant...NEXT!
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Enjoy spending the next 4 years  celebrating  DOGE's failure to root out all of the waste and  corruption that they hoped they could.

Those of us who love America will celebrate every single dollars worth of waste and fraud they uncover.

This is the America that DOPE HEADS like BV enabled  and it has sat right in his back yard all the way through Biden's term.
How embarrassing Dude.
Might as well say you love living in  Nigeria  or The Planet of the Apes    




 

Exactly....
 

ROG62 » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

27 minutes ago

irrelevant...NEXT!

 

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

 

Have you gotten around to defending your OP? Yeah...I didn't think so. 

Vegas » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

Have you gotten around to defending your OP? Yeah...I didn't think so.

You ought to see what sort of a Third World **** Hole Liberals have turned BV's home into ever  since he has been old enough to vote...!!   

Blackvegetable » Today, 4:58 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:58 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/us/p ... vings.html

DOGE Is Far Short of Its Goal, and Still Overstating Its Progress

Elon Musk now says his group will produce only 15 percent of the savings it promised. But even that estimate is inflated with errors and guesswork.
He previously said his powerful budget-cutting team could reduce the next fiscal year’s federal budget by $1 trillion, and do it by Sept. 30, the end of the current fiscal year. Instead, in a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk said that he anticipated the group would save about $150 billion, 85 percent less than its objective.

 Even that figure may be too high, according to a New York Times analysis of DOGE’s claims.

 That’s because, when Mr. Musk’s group tallies up its savings so far, it inflates its progress by including billion-dollar errors, by counting spending that will not happen in the next fiscal year — and by making guesses about spending that might not happen at all.

Fundamental Supply Side Assumptions..

Looks like Grifty, with FOX's and the NYPost's eager assistance, pulled another Big Con on the Stupidest People Alive.

G'ddammn are they **** stupid..

How **** Tiny *** dumb would anyone have to be to rely on that ****?

Seriously..

There are pissholes in snow with higher IQs...

Just to remind you, Elon is on the spectrum.

You're **** on a disabled person. I do hope you're proud of yourself. 

How about smearing Greta Thunberg next? Or do you reserve your tard hate only for billionaires?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:27 am

What would Mad Dog Mattis think of you?

What would Brian Boitano think of YOU?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:47 am

What is it doing, Ruby?

What is it doing? WHAT IS IT DOING? 

It's saving MILLIONS. Tens of MILLIONS!!!
 

*Huey » Today, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:17 am

The idiot has been wrong on so many things over the almost 8 years he has been here. He is such a ******* even his band of assholes he and Retard Tavy brought to this forum left him.

That isn't quite a fair assessment. Most of the assholes that came sailing in fled me - not him. 

One or two of them actually considered "closed-end" questions (yes/no, to you and me) "rude." That is the cowardly level of "debate" at which they were accustomed to operating. You can imagine their horror when I quickly demonstrated the climate emperor has no clothes that they could possibly describe or point to. Tasked with providing ONE PEER REVIEWED ARTICLE that showed the climate was changing beyond the margin of error, they were helpless. And the reason? No such article exists. 

Just watch - I will not be confuted. 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:12 am

Error on that scale would never be tolerated in the private sector...

And senile pederasts would be?

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:12 am

Even assuming 150 billion passes cursory scrutiny, AND is all "current", it represents a percentage of total federal spending so small you can't calculate it...not because the math is difficult, mind you.

150B / 6.8T is over 2%.

That's not chicken scratch.
That's what your Uncle Morty called a decent tip.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:12 am

At this scale, even the promised savings might not meet the cost of remediating the errors of the process....and it certainly doesn't meet the level of "waste" you would anticipate in any enterprise of its size.

This is because they whitewashed the WFA of the so-called department of "defense." In the immortal words of Tony Baretta, NOBODY **** with the Money Train.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:12 am

Now tell everyone what you refuse to do as a result of me answering your question directly, and the first time.

I'll field this one.

Call you a narcissist?

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:46 am

Note my prescience....

Now tell everyone what you refuse to do as a result of me answering your question directly, and the first time.

Now this is just bad form. 

The man acknowledged July snow - what more do you want from him?

It's not as if he exaggerates your craven cowardice. You've skirt-hiked from my questions with all the grace of Fred Astaire.

Drunk. In spike heels. With a penis painted on his forehead. 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:49 am

That's not what you'll be told to do.

Is that you, Greta?

Vegas » Today, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:03 am

     Where’s the abjection? Oh sorry, I thought answering a single question in 8 years earned you a sarcastic tribute thread, not a coronation.You want abjection? Try answering 77 more questions without a dodge, a deflection, or a strike-through tantrum. Then we’ll talk about kneeling.Until then, enjoy your frame. It’s the first and probably last time you’ll see your own coherence on display.

Narcissists  don't have the intellectual capacity to inflict abjection on anyone. You fell flat. As always.

The gay caballero could start with one of mine he ducks on the regular: If gender isn't sex, why should a gender claim affect what sex you shower with?

Or maybe this one: If there are more than two genders, why is gender SURGERY binary? 

I mean, even that little ****-mouth Ricky Tavy answered ONE of my questions.

I asked him if penises belong in his daughter's shower.

He answered, "No."               







             
 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:50 pm

What's the largest part of the discretionary budget?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cDAqrywsHE
 

Bro in Law is on his knees praying for that check from Elon. I keep telling him it likely won't happen. Perhaps Elon will foot the 2E6 X 5E3 = 100 Billion Dollars price tag.
 

nefarious101 » Yesterday, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:15 am

Hey Dickhead..

Still pissed off and fighting to keep the Pedo-Progressive taxpayer money laundering scheme going I see.

Everything you stand for is UnAmerican.....Why do you even stay in America?

You act like a spoiled little child....you bring nothing to the American table

How did we end up with people like you in this country?  You are causing great harm to the American Dream.