brown, looks like you're firing on zero cylinders...get some fuel...maybe it'll bring you up to lobotomy level...
Easy enough to determine...ROG62 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ brown, looks like you're firing on zero cylinders...get some fuel...maybe it'll bring you up to lobotomy level...
Name the last president for whom you voted, under whom private industry payrolls expanded...*Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ YOUR party sure as hell doesn't, DICKSUCK!!
It's WHY the UNIONS BACKED TRUMP ALMOST 2-1 in members votes!! YOU lost the WORKING CLASS AMERICANS and will never get them back.
PROVEN FACT!!
Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Name the last president for whom you voted, under whom private industry payrolls expanded...
Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You still haven't told me what makes you so g'ddammned stupid..
Typical nonsense from the orange cock loving ***.Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Name the last president for whom you voted, under whom private industry payrolls expanded...
I implicate household solvents.BuckNaked » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I guess the American education system along with 28 years in the Army Reserve
No, child..*Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The most recent president during whose term private industry payrolls expanded is Donald J. Trump. The latest job report shows strong growth in the private sector under his presidency.
Elaboration:Now, TELL US WHICH PRESIDENT YOU VOTED FOR THE EXPANDED GOVERNMENT PAYROLLS??
- The White House's April 4, 2025 report highlights that the March job report demonstrates a "roaring back" of the private sector, surpassing expectations for the second consecutive month.
- This suggests a positive trend in private sector employment during Trump's presidency, as indicated by the "explosive job growth" mentioned in the report.
GO!! Or RUN as you ALWAYS DO!!
BItch, that is not a stand.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Melty,
Has anyone ever explained WHY they "are the same"?
Hey BV ..Blackvegetable » 26 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, child..
When the dealin's done...
https://youtu.be/L41755emaRc?si=QxdBUbzb7MzDrEvb
https://www.youtube.com/live/18MGmFeEGG ... zpp87-SUTe
But but but ..
Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, child..
When the dealin's done...
https://youtu.be/L41755emaRc?si=QxdBUbzb7MzDrEvb
https://www.youtube.com/live/18MGmFeEGG ... zpp87-SUTe
non sequitur, brown...just quit...you're spilling over to stupid again...Blackvegetable » Today, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑ Easy enough to determine...
Name the last president for whom you voted, under whom private industry payrolls expanded...
So we’re back to Bloomberg quotes and disconnected one-liners—must be Veghead’s way of signaling he’s ready for dodge #78.Blackvegetable » Today, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... reet-peers
Cracks in “US exceptionalism” will persist with the emergence of China’s DeepSeek artificial intelligence model, Europe’s fiscal expansion and rising trade tensions that will hit American companies harder than peers in Japan and Europe, a team led by Beata Manthey wrote in a note, downgrading US equities to neutral from overweight.
“The drivers of exceptionalism are fading, both from a gross domestic product and earnings-per-share perspective,” the strategists wrote. “The US market remains relatively expensive, while EPS downgrades are intensifying.”
MAGAts?
"Make a case! Yap!"
Took Crash Bandicoot THREE MONTHS!
He'll go down in history as "worse than Trump"...
I know, I know—questions are scary. But who knows, maybe today’s the day we get a full sentence that wasn’t outsourced to a news site. Let’s see if we can keep your dodge-per-thread ratio below 100%.do you personally believe US equities are truly overvalued in the long term, or is this just another recycled market panic wrapped in international buzzwords?
ok, runner...
Told you.ROG62 » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ non sequitur, brown...just quit...you're spilling over to stupid again...
Vegas » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So we’re back to Bloomberg quotes and disconnected one-liners—must be Veghead’s way of signaling he’s ready for dodge #78.
So here’s a simple question, since your OP is once again allergic to actual opinions:
I know, I know—questions are scary. But who knows, maybe today’s the day we get a full sentence that wasn’t outsourced to a news site. Let’s see if we can keep your dodge-per-thread ratio below 100%.
where does this come from?do you personally believe US equities are truly overvalued