Liberal Forum

Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opin ... trump.html



Nathan....sure, it has taken powerpissing the scales from your eyes...but The Master likes his Hazies and is here to persist in the task.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opin ... trump.html

Nathan....sure, it has taken powerpissing the scales from your eyes...but The Master likes his Hazies and is here to persist in the task.

Hey Dickhead....

You are showing us your emotional TDS scars everyday......makes this TDS thread of yours very very Ironic

nefarious101 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Hey Dickhead....

You are showing us your emotional TDS scars everyday......makes this TDS thread of yours very very Ironic

Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.”


ibid. 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.”

ibid.

Blackvegetable » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opin ... trump.html

Nathan....sure, it has taken powerpissing the scales from your eyes...but The Master likes his Hazies and is here to persist in the task.

Excellent. Another OP where you outsource the entire argument to someone else’s quote, toss in some hazy metaphor about “The Master,” and call it a day. I assume the follow-up will be another 12-question interrogation about definitions you haven’t given yourself.

 So here’s a real one for you:

If you agree with Cofnas' claim that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of governance, what structural or ideological factors do you think specifically undermine their ability to govern—beyond just “they’re stupid” or “Grifty bad”?

 Don’t worry—I already have dodge #83 engraved and ready. Go ahead and prove me right.
 

nefarious101 » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

Hey Dickhead....

You are showing us your emotional TDS scars everyday......makes this TDS thread of yours very very Ironic

Who is the second one on the left?

nefarious101 » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Is that octomom?

BuckNaked » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Is that octomom?

Naffy's dad.

Vegas » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

32 minutes ago

Excellent. Another OP where you outsource the entire argument to someone else’s quote, toss in some hazy metaphor about “The Master,” and call it a day. I assume the follow-up will be another 12-question interrogation about definitions you haven’t given yourself.

 So here’s a real one for you:

 Don’t worry—I already have dodge #83 engraved and ready. Go ahead and prove me right.

You, being a moron, presume there is an ability to undermine...but that misses the entire point of the OP, again.

Do you need me to explain the point of the OP?


Again?
 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

You, being a moron, presume there is an ability to undermine...but that misses the entire point of the OP, again.

Do you need me to explain the point of the OP?

Again?

Hides twice. 100% accuracy. The classic Mary maneuver: claim I missed the point, imply I’m too stupid to get it, and offer to "explain it again" like you’re teaching Plato to toddlers. You’re not clarifying anything, Mary—you’re just stalling behind condescension because you still haven’t answered the actual question.

The question wasn’t whether right-wing parties are bad. It was:

what specific structural or ideological reasons do you think make them incapable of governance?

You’re at dodge #84, and still spinning like a Roomba in a philosophy department. Go ahead, explain your OP “again”—but this time, try answering the question that came from it.


1. Same old- hiding. 
2. Cower behind his usual copout. 

BuckNaked » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

Is that octomom?

No...it's BV's High School Senior Picture

BuckNaked » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

Who is the second one on the left?

Think that's alyssa milano but not really sure

nefarious101 » Today, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:53 pm

Think that's alyssa milano but not really sure

Very blurry 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:37 am

I am no match for Vegas. He is smarter, better, more informed, and far more knowledgeable. I am left with no choice but to run far away from him. He embarrasses me. I am contemplating suicide because of it.

We know. ^^^


I piss, puke, and **** all over you. 

You disgust me. 

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:37 am

Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opin ... trump.html

Nathan....sure, it has taken powerpissing the scales from your eyes...but The Master likes his Hazies and is here to persist in the task.

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:47 am

Scott Siskind, who blogs under the pseudonym Scott Alexander, has been an influential figure in Silicon Valley’s revolt against social justice ideology, though he’s never been a Trump supporter. Last week, he asked whether “edgy heterodox centrists” like himself paved the way for Trump by opening the door to once-verboten arguments. In an imaginary Socratic dialogue, he wrote, “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.”

ibid.

a "blogger"...   what lends credence to this ****? ****, brown...whose nutsack won't you lick?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:37 am

Nathan Cofnas, a right-wing philosophy professor and self-described “race realist” fixated on group differences in I.Q., wrote on X, “All over the world, almost everyone with more than half a brain is looking at the disaster of Trump (along with Putin, Yoon Suk Yeol, et al.) and drawing the very reasonable conclusion that right-wing, anti-woke parties are incapable of effective governance.” (Yoon Suk Yeol is South Korea’s recently impeached president.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/opin ... trump.html

Nathan....sure, it has taken powerpissing the scales from your eyes...but The Master likes his Hazies and is here to persist in the task.

**** you to hell you *** dick choking son of a two bit alley whore! 

ROG62 » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

a "blogger"...   what lends credence to this ****? ****, brown...whose nutsack won't you lick?

Hey, 4Chann....mind your **** lane.

*GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:33 pm

WARNING !!! RACE REALISM HAS BEEN KNOWN TO CAUSE SPONTANEOUS LIBTARD HEAD EXPLOSIONS!!!

Vegas » Today, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:05 pm

We know. ^^^

I piss, puke, and **** all over you. 

You disgust me.

Then you can start answering MY questions. 










:die: