I asked you about an article you decided to create an entire topic about in this forum. You seem to be quoting and championing the ideas of a man who basically says "*** are too dumb to get admitted to Harvard in a meritocracy".
I'm getting at the "reasoning" informing your question....Skans » 18 Apr 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ I asked you about an article you decided to create an entire topic about in this forum. You seem to be quoting and championing the ideas of a man who basically says "*** are too dumb to get admitted to Harvard in a meritocracy".
In response, you write one of your typical deflections. The real question is why are you deflecting away from your support of a Race Realist by asking about my own individual sexual escapades? I neither went to Harvard nor hold myself out as a "Race Realist".
So, are you now embracing the ideology of "Race Realism"?
For example, 1Stands?*Huey » 18 Apr 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ You are such a slippery lil **** it always best to get you to be specific. To remove your wiggle room.
Why don't you take a stand on an example?*Huey » 18 Apr 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ I'm good. You are unwilling to take a stand and post who the master is.
Let me know when you do.
How many times need you be told?You are unwilling to take a stand and post who the master is.
The term racial realism has been used to describe the claim that racial distinctions are socially constructed but enduringly important because dominant social forces continually reinforce them.Skans » 18 Apr 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑ I asked you about an article you decided to create an entire topic about in this forum. You seem to be quoting and championing the ideas of a man who basically says "*** are too dumb to get admitted to Harvard in a meritocracy".
In response, you write one of your typical deflections. The real question is why are you deflecting away from your support of a Race Realist by asking about my own individual sexual escapades? I neither went to Harvard nor hold myself out as a "Race Realist".
So, are you now embracing the ideology of "Race Realism"?
Haunting.*Huey » 18 Apr 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ You are such a slippery lil **** it always best to get you to be specific. To remove your wiggle room.
Write in compete, coherent sentences please. Otherwise, your writing, which makes no sense at all, will get ignored.Blackvegetable » 18 Apr 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑ I'm getting at the "reasoning" informing your question....
Thank you!Skans » 18 Apr 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Write in compete, coherent sentences please. Otherwise, your writing, which makes no sense at all, will get ignored.
My sentence is both complete and coherent.Skans » 18 Apr 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Write in compete, coherent sentences please. Otherwise, your writing, which makes no sense at all, will get ignored.
About a talking point defined by social consensus created by 1,064 separate interpretations of life beyond adapting in plain sight within 5 primary ancestral lineages since inception with up to 5 generation gaps living daily here all the time wishing there actually was 7 days a week 52 weeks a year instead of simply adapting to the moment as genetically eternally separated now.
Your sentence should be life plus 50 years ya lying *** *** child rapist!