precisely? a tale of two narratives...Cannonpointer » 17 Apr 2025, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑ How does it do that, precisely?
I believe you. And being strictly a checkers man, you are left with furrowed brow and Nancy and Sluggo question marks emitting from the top of your dome.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Tell us again about all of the make believe people you claim to know who have been DOGE'dJohnnyYou » 18 Apr 2025, 2:19 am » wrote: ↑ You are stuttering again.. copy, paste repeat.
I really think you should consider your mental state and stop worrying about others.

you're calling him out on something he may or may not have fully known about, much less understood...now some guy from Taiwan claims he's following it verbatim....what's true, what isn't? Coincidence or conspiracy?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom When rKelly isn't posting, he's holding up a cardboard sign at an interstate exit.....his opinion isn't worth spit.ROG62 » 18 Apr 2025, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑ you're calling him out on something he may or may not have fully known about, much less understood...now some guy from Taiwan claims he's following it verbatim....what's true, what isn't? Coincidence or conspiracy?
as you famously say....we're ****, as the world's information highway is filling up with **** making everyone none the wiser...
The big objection I have to your latest hit-piece on Trump is that you never even once say what parts of Project 2025 (something that Democrats in lock-step wagged their fingers at during the campaign) you actually object to. This why I haven't taken your topic seriously. You toss out the term "Project 2025" like a typical Democrat would, and then accuse Trump of implementing "planks" of it, as if this is a bad thing. Your entire premise is severely lacking.Cannonpointer » 16 Apr 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ He said he knew nothing about it. The Heritage Foundation is deep state. Trump's policies are deep state policies. Trump is not rescuing us from the deep state, boys and girls. He is representing it and implementing its policies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSWMEc8J88Y
RebelGator » 18 Apr 2025, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ When rKelly isn't posting, he's holding up a cardboard sign at an interstate exit.....his opinion isn't worth spit.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom He's as woke. Just differently woke. Every bit the censor as the sniffophile.Jantje_Smit » 18 Apr 2025, 1:52 am » wrote: ↑ I wouldn't be so sure Trump is representing the deep state, well, he is, but not on purpose, Trump is a narcissist, his main goal is to represent himself and go down in the history books as the president who made america great again, that it aligns with the deep state policies is just a "happy" coincidence, Trump doesn't really give a **** about them.. of course he also realizes he needs their support so he won't do anything that would piss them off, like trying to keep his promises of dismantling the deep state or releasing the Epstein client list, he doesn't want to end up like JFK.. as the saying goes, meet the new boss, same as the old boss.. only not as woke and senile and lot more entertaining..
![]()
1. Trump said he would not be implementing it. Doing so violates a campaign promise. I'm not good with that. You are. There's the disagreement, writ large. Ya know who else is totally good with being lied to, and still defends the liars who lied to them? Democ rats. Perhaps you're in the wrong party.Skans » 18 Apr 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ The big objection I have to your latest hit-piece on Trump is that you never even once say what parts of Project 2025 (something that Democrats in lock-step wagged their fingers at during the campaign) you actually object to. This why I haven't taken your topic seriously. You toss out the term "Project 2025" like a typical Democrat would, and then accuse Trump of implementing "planks" of it, as if this is a bad thing. Your entire premise is severely lacking.
All woke is equal but some are more equal than others..Cannonpointer » 18 Apr 2025, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ He's as woke. Just differently woke. Every bit the censor as the sniffophile.

Concerning Project 2025, I heard Trump address it multiple times by saying something like "Project 2025 - I really don't know what that is, "I can tell you what I stand for and what I will do when I become president......1 Deport illegal aliens, 2 make the tax cuts permanent; no tax on tips or social security, ......3........, 4.......". That's basically what he said every time he was asked about project 2025. Project 2025 wasn't his platform. He told us what his platform was.Cannonpointer » 18 Apr 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. Trump said he would not be implementing it. Doing so violates a campaign promise. I'm not good with that. You are. There's the disagreement, writ large. Ya know who else is totally good with being lied to, and still defends the liars who lied to them? Democ rats. Perhaps you're in the wrong party.
2. As with the censorship thing, I presented you with a video so that you could judge for yourself. I am not going to work my *** off explaining it so that you can give my written words the same lack of consideration you gave my video evidence. You're too **** lazy to watch a vid. I assume you're too lazy to read several paragraphs.
Skans » 19 Apr 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Concerning Project 2025, I heard Trump address it multiple times by saying something like "Project 2025 - I really don't know what that is, "I can tell you what I stand for and what I will do when I become president......1 Deport illegal aliens, 2 make the tax cuts permanent; no tax on tips or social security, ......3........, 4.......". That's basically what he said every time he was asked about project 2025. Project 2025 wasn't his platform. He told us what his platform was.
I told you I watched a good portion of the video. I didn't see it make your case that Trump is implementing every plank of project 2025. I've never even read project 2025, so I don't know what your problem with all or part of it is.
I haven't read it either. But Brian Berletic has.Skans » 19 Apr 2025, 12:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Concerning Project 2025, I heard Trump address it multiple times by saying something like "Project 2025 - I really don't know what that is, "I can tell you what I stand for and what I will do when I become president......1 Deport illegal aliens, 2 make the tax cuts permanent; no tax on tips or social security, ......3........, 4.......". That's basically what he said every time he was asked about project 2025. Project 2025 wasn't his platform. He told us what his platform was.
I told you I watched a good portion of the video. I didn't see it make your case that Trump is implementing every plank of project 2025. I've never even read project 2025, so I don't know what your problem with all or part of it is.
You're a dick sucking son of a *** whore.Cannonpointer » 16 Apr 2025, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ He said he knew nothing about it. The Heritage Foundation is deep state. Trump's policies are deep state policies. Trump is not rescuing us from the deep state, boys and girls. He is representing it and implementing its policies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSWMEc8J88Y
Cannonpointer » 16 Apr 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps YOU should have made that OP.
But that would require you to defend an OP. How unlike you that would be.
Her white woman hair is getting out of controlJantje_Smit » 19 Apr 2025, 1:51 am » wrote: ↑ All woke is equal but some are more equal than others..
Trump may be woke too (depending on the definition) but at least he got rid of the DEI/tranny worship, that's worth something, it could have been much, much, worse..
![]()