Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump’s freeze on $2.2 billion to Harvard provided no proof of wrongdoing
The Trump administration skipped over requirements, including offering to hold a hearing, when applying financial penalties related to civil rights violations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... isemitism/
Now many will assume that I am a Constitution/Due Process purist, but I see in this flagrant abuse an opportunity.
Think in terms of Cost/Benefit.
Is Harvard, and it's standing as one of the world's elite institutions of higher learning which draws the best and brightest from the entire planet to its research departments, not a small price to pay for the long term gain?
Imagine, in Jan. 2029, when President Amy Klobuchar starts selectively stripping Grifty and his dim minions of their constitutional protections.
Surely there is a labor camp on a frozen bog, somewhere in Free Ukraine, where the inmates work naked all year.....mining gravel with their nails.
THE BLACKVEGETABLE CONSTITUTIONSeventh AmendmentBlackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump’s freeze on $2.2 billion to Harvard provided no proof of wrongdoing
The Trump administration skipped over requirements, including offering to hold a hearing, when applying financial penalties related to civil rights violations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... isemitism/
Now many will assume that I am a Constitution/Due Process purist, but I see in this flagrant abuse an opportunity.
Think in terms of Cost/Benefit.
Is Harvard, and it's standing as one of the world's elite institutions of higher learning which draws the best and brightest from the entire planet to its research departments, not a small price to pay for the long term gain?
Imagine, in Jan. 2029, when President Amy Klobuchar starts selectively stripping Grifty and his dim minions of their constitutional protections.
Surely there is a labor camp on a frozen bog, somewhere in Free Ukraine, where the inmates work naked all year.....mining gravel with their nails.
Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump’s freeze on $2.2 billion to Harvard provided no proof of wrongdoing
The Trump administration skipped over requirements, including offering to hold a hearing, when applying financial penalties related to civil rights violations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... isemitism/
Now many will assume that I am a Constitution/Due Process purist, but I see in this flagrant abuse an opportunity.
Think in terms of Cost/Benefit.
Is Harvard, and it's standing as one of the world's elite institutions of higher learning which draws the best and brightest from the entire planet to its research departments, not a small price to pay for the long term gain?
Imagine, in Jan. 2029, when President Amy Klobuchar starts selectively stripping Grifty and his dim minions of their constitutional protections.
Surely there is a labor camp on a frozen bog, somewhere in Free Ukraine, where the inmates work naked all year.....mining gravel with their nails.
Are witches made of wood?Skans » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑THE BLACKVEGETABLE CONSTITUTIONSeventh Amendment
The education of progressives, disruptors, agitators, pedophiles, homosexuals, lesbians, terrorists (from home and abroad) in furtherance of their inalienable right to act like supreme jackasses and in the pursuit of all devient sexual escapades imaginable to man or goat, our Government shall force "We the People", to pay regular, exorbitant stipends and grants to private universities, particularly Harvard. We the People authorize our Government to swiftly punish any person speaking out against or not paying their fair share of tax collections to Private Universities, including beheading, stoning, firing squad, slow-hanging, and evisceration as sanctioned by Shariah Law.
Show us where the US Constitution states universities have a protected right to receive federal funds. Here's a link.Blackvegetable » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Trump’s freeze on $2.2 billion to Harvard provided no proof of wrongdoing
The Trump administration skipped over requirements, including offering to hold a hearing, when applying financial penalties related to civil rights violations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... isemitism/
Now many will assume that I am a Constitution/Due Process purist, but I see in this flagrant abuse an opportunity.
Think in terms of Cost/Benefit.
Is Harvard, and it's standing as one of the world's elite institutions of higher learning which draws the best and brightest from the entire planet to its research departments, not a small price to pay for the long term gain?
Imagine, in Jan. 2029, when President Amy Klobuchar starts selectively stripping Grifty and his dim minions of their constitutional protections.
Surely there is a labor camp on a frozen bog, somewhere in Free Ukraine, where the inmates work naked all year.....mining gravel with their nails.
Read it again, InConntinent.ConsRule » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Show us where the US Constitution states universities have a protected right to receive federal funds. Here's a link.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution
No need. Unless you can show where they have a constitutionally protected right to receive federal funds, it they want federal dollars they have to meet the conditions placed by the federal government.
ConsRule » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No need. Unless you can show where they have a constitutionally protected right to receive federal funds, it they want federal dollars they have to meet the conditions placed by the federal government.
The federal government has a process.they have to meet the conditions placed by the federal government.
nefarious101 » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ MAGA rules supreme
MAGA is WINNING
MAGA means you don't have Pedo=Progressive degenerates rubbing around on little kids with the consent and protection of Pedo+prog politicians and their weaponized government
quit squirming, brown...what's "unconstitutional"?Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The federal government has a process.
Grifty isn't "the federal government"
You just posted it.
He doesn't wear makeup.....nor is he attached to a celebrated sodomite.
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ He doesn't wear makeup.....nor is he attached to a celebrated sodomite.
factual interpretations of past existence doesn't define current events accurately any tomorrow midnight to noon each next rotation of the planet noon to midnight dawn to dusk of current today, specificity of numbers here now.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ Trump’s freeze on $2.2 billion to Harvard provided no proof of wrongdoing
The Trump administration skipped over requirements, including offering to hold a hearing, when applying financial penalties related to civil rights violations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... isemitism/
Now many will assume that I am a Constitution/Due Process purist, but I see in this flagrant abuse an opportunity.
Think in terms of Cost/Benefit.
Is Harvard, and it's standing as one of the world's elite institutions of higher learning which draws the best and brightest from the entire planet to its research departments, not a small price to pay for the long term gain?
Imagine, in Jan. 2029, when President Amy Klobuchar starts selectively stripping Grifty and his dim minions of their constitutional protections.
Surely there is a labor camp on a frozen bog, somewhere in Free Ukraine, where the inmates work naked all year.....mining gravel with their nails.