Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:02 am

No...you aren't qualified to break anything down.

You're a moron 

Let's apply Bloom to one of your OPs...

Mary, if I’m not “qualified” to break things down, then why did you just spiral into a full tantrum when I did exactly that? You're now 102 dodges deep and counting, and your only response to Bloom’s Taxonomy is to shout “Spell intelligent!” like a quiz bowl dropout. But hey—if you think you’re ready to apply Bloom to one of my OPs, let’s see it. I’m not the one hiding behind citations and gravel-mining metaphors.
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:07 am

Mary, if I’m not “qualified” to break things down, then why did you just spiral into a full tantrum when I did exactly that? You're now 102 dodges deep and counting, and your only response to Bloom’s Taxonomy is to shout “Spell intelligent!” like a quiz bowl dropout. But hey—if you think you’re ready to apply Bloom to one of my OPs, let’s see it. I’m not the one hiding behind citations and gravel-mining metaphors.

How about this one?

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=64190

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 9:59 am

You're a simpleton.

You're just butthurt because your greedy, corrupt, back-stabbing, deep-state shysters are no longer in power. The gravy train is cut off, and no you might have to check receipts for Walmart shoplifters.

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:09 am

How about this one?

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=64190

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 

We both know what you are going to say next. It's embarrassing how easy you are. 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 10:39 am

Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking. 

We both know what you are going to say next. It's embarrassing how easy you are.

How about a definition of "stalking", psychotic freak?

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:10 am

How about a definition of "stalking", psychotic freak?

Hey Dickhead....I got a question for you

What's up with all the incestuous **** going on with Pedo=Prog political celebrities?

Omar and her brother getting married and James and her Dad?

Don't worry I won't say anything about how you've never had a REAL LIVE girlfriend if we don't count your grandma.

What up with all the "keep it in the family" sex ****?

 

nefarious101 » 17 Apr 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:20 am

Hey Dickhead....I got a question for you

What's up with all the incestuous **** going on with Pedo=Prog political celebrities?

Omar and her brother getting married and James and her Dad?

Don't worry I won't say anything about how you've never had a REAL LIVE girlfriend if we don't count your grandma.

What up with all the "keep it in the family" sex ****?

Rudy Giuliani married his cousin.

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:22 am

Rudy Giuliani married his cousin.

His second cousin.  Which is safe and legal.  

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:10 am

How about a definition of "stalking", psychotic freak?

Oh sure, Mary—here’s a quick definition:

Stalking: Repeatedly checking someone’s profile, digging through old posts, and obsessively reposting them like it’s a full-time job. Sound familiar?

 If that’s not stalking, then I guess you just have a really unhealthy reading habit. Either way, the diagnosis is the same: dodge #104 and counting.
 

*Huey » 17 Apr 2025, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:25 am

His second cousin.  Which is safe and legal.

Your stands on consanguinity are many.


 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:26 am

Oh sure, Mary—here’s a quick definition:

Stalking: Repeatedly checking someone’s profile, digging through old posts, and obsessively reposting them like it’s a full-time job. Sound familiar?

 If that’s not stalking, then I guess you just have a really unhealthy reading habit. Either way, the diagnosis is the same: dodge #104 and counting.

Here's a real one..


.
harass or persecute (someone) with unwanted and obsessive attention.



shall we update the Barnacle Quotient?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:27 am

Your stands on consanguinity are many.


 

 

SSDD.

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:29 am

Here's a real one..

.
harass or persecute (someone) with unwanted and obsessive attention.

shall we update the Barnacle Quotient?

Oh look, you finally Googled a definition—and still didn’t realize you just described yourself. Daily profile checks? Old post digging? Constant replies? You’re not updating the “Barnacle Quotient,” Mary—you are the Barnacle. Cling harder. We’re nearly at dodge #106.
 
 
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:32 am

Oh look, you finally Googled a definition—and still didn’t realize you just described yourself. Daily profile checks? Old post digging? Constant replies? You’re not updating the “Barnacle Quotient,” Mary—you are the Barnacle. Cling harder. We’re nearly at dodge #106.

To those who maintain that Congenital Peasantry is a myth  ^^^^

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 7:29 am

I am an irreversible coward. 

Alright Mary, let’s settle the whole “who’s the real stalker” debate once and for all.

Here’s the deal: We tally how many times each of us has reposted the other’s words with a smug little “are these your words?” routine. I’ve maybe done it once. You’ve been doing it since 2017 like it’s a religious ritual. So, let’s run the numbers—ratio vs. ratio. Whoever’s the bigger quote-mining barnacle takes a week off. Fair stakes for a fair challenge.

Deal? Or are we dodging into #107 first?
 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:40 am

Alright Mary, let’s settle the whole “who’s the real stalker” debate once and for all.

Here’s the deal: We tally how many times each of us has reposted the other’s words with a smug little “are these your words?” routine. I’ve maybe done it once. You’ve been doing it since 2017 like it’s a religious ritual. So, let’s run the numbers—ratio vs. ratio. Whoever’s the bigger quote-mining barnacle takes a week off. Fair stakes for a fair challenge.

Deal? Or are we dodging into #107 first?

Ask why you must ask me why you can't offer deals...

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:37 am

To those who maintain that Congenital Peasantry is a myth  ^^^^

“Congenital Peasantry”—Mary’s go-to when cornered by facts and allergic to deals. You didn’t respond to the challenge; you just threw word glitter in the air and hoped it would distract everyone from the truth:

You’ve been stalking posts like a full-time archivist since 2017. Still waiting on your answer, champ. Or should we add “terms avoidance” to the Barnacle Quotient?
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:43 am

Ask why you must ask me why you can't offer deals...

**** your demands, welchy. 

Deal? It's just a week. I am sure you will live. 

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:44 am

“Congenital Peasantry”—Mary’s go-to when cornered by facts and allergic to deals. You didn’t respond to the challenge; you just threw word glitter in the air and hoped it would distract everyone from the truth:

You’ve been stalking posts like a full-time archivist since 2017. Still waiting on your answer, champ. Or should we add “terms avoidance” to the Barnacle Quotient?

What "facts"?

Do you dispute the clinical diagnosis?

Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Apr 2025, 11:45 am

**** your demands, welchy. 

Deal? It's just a week. I am sure you will live.

We don't have all day, coward.