Hides twice. “Clinical diagnosis”? Mary, the only thing clinical here is your chronic inability to answer a question, the first time asked, without spiraling into medieval word salad. And simply because you can come up with 2 examples out of 5k hardly weakens your diagnosis.Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ What "facts"?
Do you dispute the clinical diagnosis?
Is that a yes on the deal?
Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ The federal government has a process.
Grifty isn't "the federal government"
Bring me an assessment to the contrary, from a credible source, and I'll look at it...Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑ Hides twice. “Clinical diagnosis”? Mary, the only thing clinical here is your chronic inability to answer a question, the first time asked, without spiraling into medieval word salad. And simply because you can come up with 2 examples out of 5k hardly weakens your diagnosis.
That’s not a diagnosis. That’s dodge #107 wearing a lab coat.
Deal or not?Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑ Bring me an assessment to the contrary, from a credible source, and I'll look at it...
In the meantime, mine stands.
I don't see your 2nd opinion.
Fondler,*Beekeeper » 17 Apr 2025, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ And SURELY you can describe that "process" down to the nth DEGREE, huh. SUCKYBOY!!
GO!!
Nod.
Psssst. The SCOTUS has ruled that it IS Constitutional to have CONDITIONS on Federal Funds before they are awarded. See South Dakota v. Dole case (483 U.S. 203 (1987))
Nor do I see yours. Oh that's right. the rules don't apply to, narcissist boy.
Hey Dickhead...

I will.*Beekeeper » 17 Apr 2025, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ So you can't describe the PROCESS you are claiming exists!!
@ROG62
BOOM!!
Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I will.
When you tell me if the Fed buys stocks...
**** your questions/demands. Defend your stupid OP and answer questions you pos coward. Now!Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ **** your questions/demands. Defend your stupid OP and answer questions you pos coward. Now!
He's a **** lawyer, clinger...your delusions run deep...Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ He doesn't wear makeup.....nor is he attached to a celebrated sodomite.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom NYSlime's **** opinion...Blackvegetable » 17 Apr 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑ But if a critical mass of Americans do wake up, then the court’s stand will be indispensable to justice and — critically — accountability. Every public official associated with Trump’s defiance of the courts (including his vice president, JD Vance) should be impeached, convicted and barred forever from holding public office
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/17/opin ... arcia.html
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Skans » 17 Apr 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑ I'll let Trump deal with the courts. I'm just glad evil criminals have been deported. And, so are most Democrats! That's what you really hate. Trump is doing things that most Americans approve of. You and your ilk are on the wrong side of history.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Vegas » 17 Apr 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Alright Mary, let’s settle the whole “who’s the real stalker” debate once and for all.
Here’s the deal: We tally how many times each of us has reposted the other’s words with a smug little “are these your words?” routine. I’ve maybe done it once. You’ve been doing it since 2017 like it’s a religious ritual. So, let’s run the numbers—ratio vs. ratio. Whoever’s the bigger quote-mining barnacle takes a week off. Fair stakes for a fair challenge.
Deal? Or are we dodging into #107 first?