Liberal Forum

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Apr 2025, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 5:45 pm

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT.......NOTHING....!!!!   

as opposed to the hellfire the rich and selfish will inherit?

*GHETTOBLASTER » 20 Apr 2025, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 5:45 pm

THE MEEK SHALL INHERIT.......NOTHING....!!!!   

Once the brave all kill themselves they may have a good chance. Although what they will inherit is questionable.

jerrab » 20 Apr 2025, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 6:05 pm

as opposed to the hellfire the rich and selfish will inherit?

  If that's what it takes to make underachievers get through the day.

Trouble with your coping mechanism is...

I think ENVY is a sin and so is your insane jealousy of those who pushed themselves harder and accomplished more than you ever did....  

jerrab » 20 Apr 2025, 5:42 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 5:42 pm

there is no one trump supporters hate more than Christ.

matthew 5

 Blessed are the merciful,
    for they will be shown mercy.

jerra b..  I am really worried  about "The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth"

It will be all used up and hot as an oven by then. The rich will be going into orbit in the Heavens with all the Bill Gates Bug Burgers they can eat.
 
 

jerrab » 20 Apr 2025, 6:05 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 6:05 pm

as opposed to the hellfire the rich and selfish will inherit?

what a phooking rat bastard @GHETTO BLASTER   is..  He hasn't figured out he is one of the meek LOL.
 
 

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 1:15 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:15 am

jerra b..  I am really worried  about "The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth"

It will be all used up and hot as an oven by then. The rich will be going into orbit in the Heavens with all the Bill Gates Bug Burgers they can eat.

trump is everything Jesus hates. he is not meek, he is a braggart, he is not merciful, he stopped giving food to americans and he certainly does not want peace in israel. but no matter what he does his supporters still support him no matter what he does,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
--------------------------


 
 
 

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 1:15 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:15 am

jerra b..  I am really worried  about "The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth"

It will be all used up and hot as an oven by then. The rich will be going into orbit in the Heavens with all the Bill Gates Bug Burgers they can eat.

the earth withstood atom bombs

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 1:15 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 1:15 am

jerra b..  I am really worried  about "The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth"

It will be all used up and hot as an oven by then. The rich will be going into orbit in the Heavens with all the Bill Gates Bug Burgers they can eat.

inside their brains is trump trump we must support trump trump trump

Blackvegetable » 20 Apr 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 11:33 am

We know that you lie about this.

We also know you didn't read Judge Kaplan's decision....

You are too stupid to read my actual post.  Judge Kaplan's decision and filing does not use NY Law (even he admits that in the filing) and it is not A JURY VERDICT.  For someone who brags about his education and credentials, you are one stupid mother-****.

ConsRule » Yesterday, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:49 am

You are too stupid to read my actual post.  Judge Kaplan's decision and filing does not use NY Law (even he admits that in the filing) and it is not A JURY VERDICT.  For someone who brags about his education and credentials, you are one stupid mother-****.

Shut your padresucker and read the filing, Connie...

Your idea of the "jury verdict" is in laughable error.
 

MR-7 » 20 Apr 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

20 Apr 2025, 10:51 am

are fighting and scheming so hard to bring Murderers, Drug Lords, Dangerous Prisoners, the Mentally Insane, and well-known MS-13 Gang Members and Wife Beaters, back into our Country,” Trump, 78, began his Truth Social screed Sunday.

Trump trolls Dems in Easter message, slams Biden as ‘highly destructive moron’

Well over half of registered voters here in the USA know he's right.

According to one article (MSN) THREE MILLION attended anti-Trump rallies.
         

They had to add up estimates from every place they could find with an anti-Trump stick and cardboard.

....priceless...
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:01 am

Shut your padresucker and read the filing, Connie...

Your idea of the "jury verdict" is in laughable error.

If you insist.  First, the filing WAS NOT A TRIAL VERDICT.  It is his ruling on the appeal.  Here is a link to the filing by Kaplan;

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

Starting on page 3 (emphasis mine);

"The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”

As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4 The finding that Ms. not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

Read the notes...he clearly admits, for his ruling on the appeal, he is using definitions found in codes other than NY Law.

Here is a link TO THE ACTUAL JURY VERDICT FORM in the trial E Jean Carroll v Donald J Trump

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059

 
 
 
 

ConsRule » Yesterday, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:05 pm

If you insist.  First, the filing WAS NOT A TRIAL VERDICT.  It is his ruling on the appeal.  Here is a link to the filing by Kaplan;

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

Starting on page 3 (emphasis mine);

"The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law – a section that provides that the label “rape” as used in criminal prosecutions in New York applies only to vaginal penetration by a penis. Forcible, unconsented-to penetration of the vagina or of other bodily orifices by fingers, other body parts, or other articles or materials is not called “rape” under the New York Penal Law. It instead is labeled “sexual abuse.”

As is shown in the following notes, the definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries,2 in some federal and state criminal statutes,3 and elsewhere.4 The finding that Ms. not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

Read the notes...he clearly admits, for his ruling on the appeal, he is using definitions found in codes other than NY Law.

Here is a link TO THE ACTUAL JURY VERDICT FORM in the trial E Jean Carroll v Donald J Trump

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059

 

How many pages is the opinion?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:58 pm

How many pages is the opinion?

Follow the link and find out...I'm not your servant.
 

ConsRule » Yesterday, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:53 pm

Follow the link and find out...I'm not your servant.

Of course....