I take that back.TwoIfByTea » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Heck I make fun of "Both Sides" but my basic values have not changed one eyota
jefftec » Today, 5:56 pm » wrote: ↑ ..there was a time when common knowledge proclaimed that the earth was round, until an alternative perspective was introduced.
There are times when what is shown should be questioned/scrutinized.
I don't mind admitting being wrong but sometimes it's more fun just to keep going in order to annoy people who don't deserve to be right (those who think they are infallible) or just for the hell of it..DeezerShoove » 22 Apr 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Is it possible to expect people to show the weakness of being wrong? Or changing their view?
We have posters here that, from what I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.
Trey Gowdy?Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:40 pm » wrote: ↑ You missed a prediction? How courageous of you to admit that two years later, you panty dancing fraud. I proved you wrong with a you tube link consisting of CONGRESSIONAL TESTIMONY, giving you the start and end time of the 46 seconds that proved you wrong, and you insisted that you didn't trust youtube clips and demanded a transcript.
You run from questions like a bitch - you're the biggest **** on the board, you cowardly fapper.
To think I thought Cannonpointer was the soc Murdock. Social mind is a dead give-a-way to an ancestral brain believing now isn't eternity can pretend to be anything other than all they been since conceived.Deezer Shoove » Yesterday, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Use a Bic razor and slit your wrist. Don't waste money. A used one can do the trick.
31stArrival » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ To think I thought Cannonpointer was the soc Murdock. Social mind is a dead give-a-way to an ancestral brain believing now isn't eternity can pretend to be anything other than all they been since conceived.
Did you ever figure out light energy is same magnetic poles resisting each other from coming together. Opposite polarities attract but the universe is a perpetual balancing results of spinning, orbiting, revolving, spiraling, expanding, contracting, never same results twice situation for any reproduction native to a single planet in a single solar system universally here now as specifically performing defying why they exist proportionately alive today in their precise generation gap, ancestral lineage, geographical location since a fertilized cell in the 8.096 billion others living now.Deezer Shoove » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Isn't it just wonderful to "see the light"?
I love when it happens to me.
Good for you. :)
jefftec » Yesterday, 10:35 pm » wrote: ↑ ...a little proofreading would have been beneficial....my bad..
31stArrival » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Did you ever figure out light energy is same magnetic poles resisting each other from coming together. Opposite polarities attract but the universe is a perpetual balancing results of spinning, orbiting, revolving, spiraling, expanding, contracting, never same results twice situation for any reproduction native to a single planet in a single solar system universally here now as specifically performing defying why they exist proportionately alive today in their precise generation gap, ancestral lineage, geographical location since a fertilized cell in the 8.096 billion others living now.
Bandwidth kind of like electrical wave characteristics between AC and DC current flows and frequency at travelling the same speed oscillating in series parallel time until refracted(prism) REFLECTION. Humans harness energy, they do not create or destroy the natural process of perpetual motion naturally occurring so far and why humans will never duplicate perpetual motion again since it is the source of power that keeps chromosomes never same reproduction twice.Deezer Shoove » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If light speed is constant, why does a prism separate colors into a spectrum?
31stArrival » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Bandwidth kind of like electrical wave characteristics between AC and DC current flows and frequency at travelling the same speed oscillating in series parallel time until refracted(prism) REFLECTION. Humans harness energy, they do not create or destroy the natural process of perpetual motion naturally occurring so far and why humans will never duplicate perpetual motion again since it is the source of power that keeps chromosomes never same reproduction twice.
Looking doesn't see until there is a reflection of an object bouncing back. Listening doesn't hear until the echo returns. Touch doesn't feel until senses another form of substance in three molecular states of gaseous, liquid, mineral characteristics of inorganic combinations present.
periodic elements and organic chromosomes come in simple compounding sequences between inception, conception, erosion, decomposition of previous to added combinations here so far.
8 hemispheres of creation and humanity only worships father son and holy ghost(great great grandchild not conceived yet every 4 generations lived so far)
Interpretation by humans to feel superior to other life forms equally eternally separated now. Oops I did it again, debunked humanity not ancestors living in plain sight.Deezer Shoove » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Following your logic from my question to your answer:
Hair is on humans; fur is on non-human mammals.
31stArrival » Today, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ To think I thought Cannonpointer was the soc Murdock. Social mind is a dead give-a-way to an ancestral brain believing now isn't eternity can pretend to be anything other than all they been since conceived.
And so many other screen names. Characters perform on a world stage.Deezer Shoove » 53 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ *Roshambo is BlaVe.
He gives himself greenies.
FYI in case you needed a dumb **** to pick on. :wave:
Got me…hehCannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I am a throwback to that bygone era. I STILL think the earth is round.
Why do ancestral boxed in opinions become spheres of influence corrupting every great great grandchild born daily here each generation gap lived last 7,000 years? Every reality is built sustaining reasonable doubt how genetics sustain numbers daily here.
You stupid queer, Gowdy was asking the QUESTIONS. You made a claim that Comey never found a crime by Hitlery - I showed him testifying to Congress that her conduct was in fact criminal.Blackvegetable » Today, 4:52 am » wrote: ↑ Trey Gowdy?
![]()
![]()
![]()
Did you read the IG report, cretinous slack jaw?
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You stupid queer, Gowdy was asking the QUESTIONS. You made a claim that Comey never found a crime by Hitlery - I showed him testifying to Congress that her conduct was in fact criminal.
How did you know it was Gowdy, you little queer? Did you secretly watch? Did your cheeks heat up with embarrassment, and go red as your politics?
I'll bet you did and I'll bet they did, panty dancer. That was the last time I worried myself about giving a *** like you any evidence to ignore. You are precisely the sort of weak **** stain the OP is about, son.
Lying, ducking, and panty dancing give the other fellow ownership of your ***. At any time, the guy you ducked can call you out - and you can't say ****. He owns you.DeezerShoove » Today, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ There are times when even you have admitted to a mistake or change of heart as time passes or information comes to light.
And as I previously alluded, it is as admirable a quality to do so as much as it is trashy to not.
BTW
Doesn't it seem odd that an obtuse **** like Blave would misread someone asking a question?
It is the single thing he is quite practiced at himself.
DeezerShoove » 22 Apr 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ Is it possible to expect people to show the weakness of being wrong? Or changing their view?
We have posters here that, from what I can tell, act like any number of other cyber-forums.
Sarcasm is called lies. Mean stuff is inaccurately referred to as sarcasm. Analogies taken out of context.
Things that are just pounded home day after day. Useless for the most part except to try to needle someone.
Sure, there are times when a "reminder" makes sense. Priceless stuff.
Most of it ain't priceless though.
Once in a great while when someone admits they were wrong a modicum of respect is shown.
Maybe even a greenie or two. So why is it so rare?
Is being an infallible Chatroom Champ really that enticing?
There many examples of all this crap but I'm starting out neutral.