Trump was the first to give offensive weapons to the US proxy. He was the first to introduce the harshest sanctions. Biden simply stayed with the Trump policy.*Beekeeper » 24 Apr 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ So, tell us how much did your boy BIDEN send to the Ukrainians to keep THAT war going into eternity!!
GO!!
Then you can MAYBE have something you can reason with. But you really don't, but your LWNJ-ery is just more of the same **** you always spew and vomit.
They agreed to do precisely that - and then Trump tore up the agreement.BuckNaked » 24 Apr 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok will they allow inspections of those facilities at any time unannounced?
Cannonpointer » 24 Apr 2025, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump was the first to give offensive weapons to the US proxy. He was the first to introduce the harshest sanctions. Biden simply stayed with the Trump policy.
Your eternal soul is nothing more than factual artificial knowledge socially put into context beyond the content of your functioning brain so specific persons can make you mind power of suggestion cradle to grave throughout history of your specific ancestral lineage so far.
I know...but I couldn't take the pain of having to replay several minutes of his whining.Cannonpointer » 24 Apr 2025, 9:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, Dore fails to preach to your liking. Too much truth for the likes of you.
If you had paid attention, he stated the provenance of the clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neOfWcRL7Cg
Javelins.*Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2025, 4:30 am » wrote: ↑ OH really? So which "offensive" weapons did Trump give Ukraine??
GO!!
OR will you do a BV and run too?
The issue is lethal v. non-lethal.*Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2025, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑ Javelins are NOT offensive weapons, ASSWIPE!!
Defensive, yes. Sucks you know so little about everything, huh?
Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑ The issue is lethal v. non-lethal.
Obama had hedged on the Javelins, Trump sent them.
Please stop.*Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2025, 5:53 am » wrote: ↑ No, DICKBREATH, ANY weapon is lethal. PERIOD!!
The QUESTION is OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE!!
A Javelin missile is NOT USED FOR ANY OFFENSIVE PURPOSE. PERIOD!! It's NOT CAPABLE OF THAT MISSION WHEN IT'S SOLE PURPOSE IS TO DESTROY THE OFFENSIVE TANKS THE RUSSIAN ALWAYS USE IN ATTACKS!! You would be in for a RUDE AWAKENING if you used a Javelin missile on an attack your enemy basis.
And Trump didn't "send them", he SOLD THEM for Ukraine to have DEFENSIVE WEAPONS to stop Russian tanks when they attacked.
You're a **** IDIOT!!
Yep, #2!!
Cannon is good with the feefees, but sucks (literally and figuratively) on details.
Who gives a **** about Obama?Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ Cannon is good with the feefees, but sucks (literally and figuratively) on details.
The issue was lethal v non lethal aid.
The Javelins were considered a line Obama chose not to cross.
Republicans in Congress obliged Grifty to send them.
Now you know, now you can shut the **** up.
they did before tRump broke the obomba dealBuckNaked » 24 Apr 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Ok will they allow inspections of those facilities at any time unannounced?
Were you in the Navy?RebelGator » 25 Apr 2025, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑ Who gives a **** about Obama?
You have a lethal mouth and a non-lethal ***.....add that definition to your vocabulary.
THE ONLY one saying "lethal vs non-lethal" is YOU, COCKBREATH!!Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ Cannon is good with the feefees, but sucks (literally and figuratively) on details.
The issue was lethal v non lethal aid.
The Javelins were considered a line Obama chose not to cross.
Republicans in Congress obliged Grifty to send them.
Now you know, now you can shut the **** up.
Well, let me google that for you, fruitcake. I went with the first entry.*Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2025, 4:30 am » wrote: ↑ OH really? So which "offensive" weapons did Trump give Ukraine??
GO!!
OR will you do a BV and run too?
I said "Stop!"*Beekeeper » 25 Apr 2025, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ THE ONLY one saying "lethal vs non-lethal" is YOU, COCKBREATH!!
Sucks you are THIS **** STUPID and can't seem to understand that JAVELIN MISSILES ARE NOT OFFENSIVE WEAPONS as you try to OBFUSCATE THE DISCUSSION with your **** "lethal vs non-lethal" DIVERSION!!
Please, RUN ALONG DICKSUCK, AND ACCEPT THE *** KICKING WITH SOME LEVEL OF HUMILITY!!
@ROG62
And what was your dodge when the evidence was given time stamped, in the format of a straight and short monologue, pussboi? In that one, your excuse was that you do not trust video - you required a transcript.Blackvegetable » 25 Apr 2025, 5:14 am » wrote: ↑ I know...but I couldn't take the pain of having to replay several minutes of his whining.
Thanks.....
Do you mind?Cannonpointer » 25 Apr 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ And what was your dodge when the evidence was given time stamped, in the format of a straight and short monologue, pussboi? In that one, your excuse was that you do not trust video - you required a transcript.
He does have a scratchiness...