Liberal Forum

TwoIfByTea » 23 Apr 2025, 8:52 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Apr 2025, 8:52 pm

Wanna fix education.

Call me a "Communist" but UNIFORMS and Dress Code a "Decorum".

Everybody on the same page now.

Uniforms instill a sense of respect & responsibility too

I have to agree with this. The better private schools (K-12) have dress codes and even uniforms.  Ivy league schools used to have dress codes for most of the 20th century.

Now, those colleges and universities who actually demand excellence from their students and faculty do have dress codes. Further, the best graduate schools definitely have dress codes which they actually enforce.

How a person presents themselves says something about who they are.  When you are a kid, no one needs or wants to hear your uneducated opinions - so you wear a uniform mandated by those who are far more educated than you are, while you are absorbing enough information to some day have an opinion worthy of expression. 

In college, some "liberal" schools believe their students suddenly have informed opinions worthy of expression, so they have relaxed the dress code to bare decency, in order to show their flock that professors and administrators value their opinions.  Truth, they don't!  They despise these ripped-jeans wearing ignorant sluts and tattooed, gauge-wearing chronic-masturbaters. But, they need the money.

Then, there are a few private schools, most of which are affiliated with a religious denomination.  These institutions expect their professors to actually teach a structured curriculum.  They expect their students to dress respectfully and even professionally to prepare them for why lies ahead. Sadly, they need money too - and, yes, even these institutions are relaxing their dress codes in an effort to pander to more students.  They do this because school administrators, professors and even school governors tend to be poor at communicating and marketing.  They are weak, and have too much rot from within to "sell" high-standards to an incoming class of Freshmen.



Morning rant over.
 
 

Skans » 24 Apr 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 7:29 am

I have to agree with this. The better private schools (K-12) have dress codes and even uniforms.  Ivy league schools used to have dress codes for most of the 20th century.

Now, those colleges and universities who actually demand excellence from their students and faculty do have dress codes. Further, the best graduate schools definitely have dress codes which they actually enforce.

How a person presents themselves says something about who they are.  When you are a kid, no one needs or wants to hear your uneducated opinions - so you wear a uniform mandated by those who are far more educated than you are, while you are absorbing enough information to some day have an opinion worthy of expression. 

In college, some "liberal" schools believe their students suddenly have informed opinions worthy of expression, so they have relaxed the dress code to bare decency, in order to show their flock that professors and administrators value their opinions.  Truth, they don't!  They despise these ripped-jeans wearing ignorant sluts and tattooed, gauge-wearing chronic-masturbaters. But, they need the money.

Then, there are a few private schools, most of which are affiliated with a religious denomination.  These institutions expect their professors to actually teach a structured curriculum.  They expect their students to dress respectfully and even professionally to prepare them for why lies ahead. Sadly, they need money too - and, yes, even these institutions are relaxing their dress codes in an effort to pander to more students.  They do this because school administrators, professors and even school governors tend to be poor at communicating and marketing.  They are weak, and have too much rot from within to "sell" high-standards to an incoming class of Freshmen.



Morning rant over.
 
 

How a person acts socially doesn't define why they exist specifically ancestrally here. Socially nurtured uniform behavior educated cradle to grave isn't the same thing as naturally timed individually eternally separated apart in plain sight.

31stArrival » 24 Apr 2025, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 8:34 am

How a person acts socially doesn't define why they exist specifically ancestrally here. Socially nurtured uniform behavior educated cradle to grave isn't the same thing as naturally timed individually eternally separated apart in plain sight.

Take your seat, Mr. Arrival.  Your head is so full of mush that you lack even the basic intelligence ask a proper question.
 

Skans » 24 Apr 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 8:43 am

Take your seat, Mr. Arrival.  Your head is so full of mush that you lack even the basic intelligence ask a proper question.
 

now you are playing the John Houseman role from The Paper Chase. I saw the movie and watched the TV series.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQLW7v3s7KQ

 

Skans » 24 Apr 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 9:01 am

So, Mr. Arival, you have demonstrated that you are minimally capable of stringing words together to form a cogent sentence.  You should call your mother and tell her the good news.  I would give you a dime, but pay phones no longer exist, and quite frankly, your performance is not worthy of my dime, Mr. Arival.
 

Not my fault your nurture mind won't accept your brain navigating space in natural time equally alive.

31stArrival » 24 Apr 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 9:07 am

Not my fault your nurture mind won't accept your brain navigating space in natural time equally alive.

We both have our "cheap tricks", don't we.
 

Skans » 24 Apr 2025, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

24 Apr 2025, 9:08 am

We both have our "cheap tricks", don't we.
 

no we don't, you do.

there are no tricks in self evident time alive. relative time theory tricks every generation gap alive. 2 days a week factually every rotation of the planet 365 or 366 days a year each ancestor occupying space life never stays evolving as same total sum twice in series parallel heartbeats forward now.