Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 8:04 am

Go 

Refusing to answer, huh??

When your "rank choice voting" gets EXPOSED FOR DISENFRANCHING VOTERS, you DICKSUCKERS ALWAYS RUN!!

So tell us about the BALLOTS THAT GET TOSSED IN TRYING TO COUNT AND DETERMINE A WINNER!!!

GO. Or do as you ALWAYS DO....

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7c/05/5a ... 0953ed.gif

*Beekeeper » 30 Apr 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 8:13 am

 
Refusing to answer, huh??

When your "rank choice voting" gets EXPOSED FOR DISENFRANCHING VOTERS, you DICKSUCKERS ALWAYS RUN!!

So tell us about the BALLOTS THAT GET TOSSED IN TRYING TO COUNT AND DETERMINE A WINNER!!!

GO. Or do as you ALWAYS DO....

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/7c/05/5a ... 0953ed.gif

 Tell you about a hypothetical that you made up? :LOL:

it works in the states that use it 
 

Mrkelly » 29 Apr 2025, 4:14 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 4:14 pm

  You guys poo poo Wikipedia sources all the time
 

The FACT is... Wikipedia sources are usually NOT BAD... and, at least currently, STRIVE to be correct & accurate...

UNLIKE Democrats... who LIE, PROJECT LIES, EXAGGERATE, MISS-STATE, CONFUSE, and OBFUSCATE...  THAT is what Democrats DO !!

However, one think the Democrats CAN NOT change... is that Democrat Party approval ratings are at ALL TIME LOWS... and with LIES that do NOT take a "rocket scientist" to see thru, DO NOT expect that to change anytime soon !

                     

ConservativeWave » 30 Apr 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 8:33 am

The FACT is... Wikipedia sources are usually NOT BAD... and, at least currently, STRIVE to be correct & accurate...

UNLIKE Democrats... who LIE, PROJECT LIES, EXAGGERATE, MISS-STATE, CONFUSE, and OBFUSCATE...  THAT is what Democrats DO !!

However, one thing the Democrats CAN NOT change... is that Democrat Party approval ratings are CURRENTLY at ALL TIME LOWS... and with Democrat LIES that do NOT take a "rocket scientist" to see thru, DO NOT expect that to change anytime soon !

                   
 

 

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 8:22 am

 Tell you about a hypothetical that you made up? 

it works in the states that use it

NOW you are REFUSING to show us how RANKED CHOICE VOTING ACTUALLY WORKS and how VOTERS ARE DISENFRANCISED if their FIRST CHOICE CANDIDATE doesn't have enough votes to either win outright OR get into a run off!!

Let's try this again....

CAN YOUR BALLOT BE TOSSED IF THE "run-off" goes 3-4-5 rounds to determine a winner??

GO!! SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL DO, COCKLYSUCKER!

*Beekeeper » 30 Apr 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 10:51 am

NOW you are REFUSING to show us how RANKED CHOICE VOTING ACTUALLY WORKS and how VOTERS ARE DISENFRANCISED if their FIRST CHOICE CANDIDATE doesn't have enough votes to either win outright OR get into a run off!!

Let's try this again....

CAN YOUR BALLOT BE TOSSED IF THE "run-off" goes 3-4-5 rounds to determine a winner??

GO!! SIMPLE YES OR NO WILL DO, COCKLYSUCKER!

Educate your own *******

it works in many areas

quit being a useful idiot for the one party system 

RCV WINS ON THE BALLOTIn 2023, voters in seven cities voted in favor of preserving, adopting, or expanding RCV – growing its winning streak to 27 city ballot measure wins in a row!

• Kalamazoo, East Lansing, and Royal Oak, Michigan all said YES to RCV in November 2023! These cities are home to about 180,000 Michiganders, and will implement RCV pending state approval.
• Easthampton, MA voted to implement proportional RCV for multi-winner elections, with 60% voting yes. Easthampton already uses RCV in single-winner elections. 
• Minnetonka, MN reaffirmed its support for RCV in the face of a repeal attempt. 59% voted in favor of keeping RCV – a larger margin than when RCV first won in 2020, showing that voters like RCV even more now that they’ve used it. 
• Redondo Beach, CA said YES to RCV, with 77% voting in favor. Redondo Beach will join seven other California cities in using RCV.
• Burlington, VT said YES to RCV for a second time in three years, with 64% in favor. Burlington will expand RCV to apply to all municipal elections; it previously applied only to city council races. 
  
  https://fairvote.org/report/2023-a-year-in-review/
•  

 
 

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm

Educate your own *******

it works in many areas

quit being a useful idiot for the one party system 

RCV WINS ON THE BALLOTIn 2023, voters in seven cities voted in favor of preserving, adopting, or expanding RCV – growing its winning streak to 27 city ballot measure wins in a row!

• Kalamazoo, East Lansing, and Royal Oak, Michigan all said YES to RCV in November 2023! These cities are home to about 180,000 Michiganders, and will implement RCV pending state approval.
• Easthampton, MA voted to implement proportional RCV for multi-winner elections, with 60% voting yes. Easthampton already uses RCV in single-winner elections. 
• Minnetonka, MN reaffirmed its support for RCV in the face of a repeal attempt. 59% voted in favor of keeping RCV – a larger margin than when RCV first won in 2020, showing that voters like RCV even more now that they’ve used it. 
• Redondo Beach, CA said YES to RCV, with 77% voting in favor. Redondo Beach will join seven other California cities in using RCV.
• Burlington, VT said YES to RCV for a second time in three years, with 64% in favor. Burlington will expand RCV to apply to all municipal elections; it previously applied only to city council races. 
  
  https://fairvote.org/report/2023-a-year-in-review/
•  

Well here he is again...Dribbles the "XI Sniffer"

Dribbles sits in a nursing home all day crying, moaning and making **** up on the internet

nefarious101 » 30 Apr 2025, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 1:07 pm

Well here he is again...Dribbles the "XI Sniffer"

Dribbles sits in a nursing home all day crying, moaning and making **** up on the internet

  Poor lil feller

still nuthin   

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm

Educate your own *******

it works in many areas

quit being a useful idiot for the one party system 

RCV WINS ON THE BALLOTIn 2023, voters in seven cities voted in favor of preserving, adopting, or expanding RCV – growing its winning streak to 27 city ballot measure wins in a row!

• Kalamazoo, East Lansing, and Royal Oak, Michigan all said YES to RCV in November 2023! These cities are home to about 180,000 Michiganders, and will implement RCV pending state approval.
• Easthampton, MA voted to implement proportional RCV for multi-winner elections, with 60% voting yes. Easthampton already uses RCV in single-winner elections. 
• Minnetonka, MN reaffirmed its support for RCV in the face of a repeal attempt. 59% voted in favor of keeping RCV – a larger margin than when RCV first won in 2020, showing that voters like RCV even more now that they’ve used it. 
• Redondo Beach, CA said YES to RCV, with 77% voting in favor. Redondo Beach will join seven other California cities in using RCV.
• Burlington, VT said YES to RCV for a second time in three years, with 64% in favor. Burlington will expand RCV to apply to all municipal elections; it previously applied only to city council races. 
  
  https://fairvote.org/report/2023-a-year-in-review/
•  

!!

“This November, voters in seven states decided that RCV is not a good fit for their state. As the Institute for Responsive Government has repeatedly emphasized, RCV is not a one-size-fits-all solution and policymakers should carefully consider the benefits and drawbacks in their state.” said Sam Oliker-Friedland, executive director of the Institute for Responsive Government. “Any state that decides to adopt RCV should have a well-funded, well-designed system with critical support from election administrators. Many of the initiatives that failed this year simply lacked the clarity and support necessary for the implementation of a sound RCV system, and failed to provide clear plans to minimize voter confusion and voter error.”

*Beekeeper » 30 Apr 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 1:11 pm

!!

“This November, voters in seven states decided that RCV is not a good fit for their state. As the Institute for Responsive Government has repeatedly emphasized, RCV is not a one-size-fits-all solution and policymakers should carefully consider the benefits and drawbacks in their state.” said Sam Oliker-Friedland, executive director of the Institute for Responsive Government. “Any state that decides to adopt RCV should have a well-funded, well-designed system with critical support from election administrators. Many of the initiatives that failed this year simply lacked the clarity and support necessary for the implementation of a sound RCV system, and failed to provide clear plans to minimize voter confusion and voter error.”

Once people know what it REALLY IS, DICKSUCK, THEY REJECT IT TOTALLY!!

Sucks for you, huh?? @Mrkelly  
 
 

*Beekeeper » 30 Apr 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 1:11 pm

!!

“This November, voters in seven states decided that RCV is not a good fit for their state. As the Institute for Responsive Government has repeatedly emphasized, RCV is not a one-size-fits-all solution and policymakers should carefully consider the benefits and drawbacks in their state.” said Sam Oliker-Friedland, executive director of the Institute for Responsive Government. “Any state that decides to adopt RCV should have a well-funded, well-designed system with critical support from election administrators. Many of the initiatives that failed this year simply lacked the clarity and support necessary for the implementation of a sound RCV system, and failed to provide clear plans to minimize voter confusion and voter error.”

Link?   

what year was that?
 

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 2:03 pm

Link?   

what year was that?

THIS PAST ELECTION 2024.

Try GOOGLE, you DUMB PIECE OF PIG ****!!

Are you THIS **** dense you can't look things up in today's TECHNICAL WORLD??

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 2:03 pm

Link?   

what year was that?

Here, you LAZY PIECE OF ****!!

Five states reject ranked-choice voting measures, Alaska retains system after recount – Ballotpedia News

In 2024, voters decided on seven ballot measures related to ranked-choice voting, the most ever in a single year. While voters in one state—Alaska—retained RCV, five measures to adopt the system were rejected in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, and Oregon. In Missouri, voters approved a constitutional amendment to prohibit RCV.
 

*Beekeeper » 30 Apr 2025, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 4:17 pm

Here, you LAZY PIECE OF ****!!

Five states reject ranked-choice voting measures, Alaska retains system after recount – Ballotpedia News

In 2024, voters decided on seven ballot measures related to ranked-choice voting, the most ever in a single year. While voters in one state—Alaska—retained RCV, five measures to adopt the system were rejected in Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, and Oregon. In Missouri, voters approved a constitutional amendment to prohibit RCV.

was that so hard?   

That only means that the,one party system has control

It will happen when enough Americans figure it out

that and. Public funding of elections

2025

Use of Ranked Choice Voting Alaska and Maine are the only states to use ranked choice voting for statewide elections. Some cities in the U.S. use ranked choice voting for general elections including St. Paul, Minn., Portland, Maine, and several cities in the San Francisco Bay Area. Other locations, including New York City, use ranked choice voting in primary elections. Cambridge, Mass. and Minneapolis, Minn., use ranked choice voting in multimember districts. 
 
 

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 8:22 am

 Tell you about a hypothetical that you made up? 

it works in the states that use it

ask him about the lie that trump says china was ripping off america.

Mrkelly » 30 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 12:57 pm

Educate your own *******

it works in many areas

quit being a useful idiot for the one party system 

RCV WINS ON THE BALLOTIn 2023, voters in seven cities voted in favor of preserving, adopting, or expanding RCV – growing its winning streak to 27 city ballot measure wins in a row!

• Kalamazoo, East Lansing, and Royal Oak, Michigan all said YES to RCV in November 2023! These cities are home to about 180,000 Michiganders, and will implement RCV pending state approval.
• Easthampton, MA voted to implement proportional RCV for multi-winner elections, with 60% voting yes. Easthampton already uses RCV in single-winner elections. 
• Minnetonka, MN reaffirmed its support for RCV in the face of a repeal attempt. 59% voted in favor of keeping RCV – a larger margin than when RCV first won in 2020, showing that voters like RCV even more now that they’ve used it. 
• Redondo Beach, CA said YES to RCV, with 77% voting in favor. Redondo Beach will join seven other California cities in using RCV.
• Burlington, VT said YES to RCV for a second time in three years, with 64% in favor. Burlington will expand RCV to apply to all municipal elections; it previously applied only to city council races. 
  
  https://fairvote.org/report/2023-a-year-in-review/
•  

HA!!  ALL of those are LOCAL elections... you might almost be able to EXCUSE local elections.. because it's a MUCH smaller fishbowl at the local level.

However, at the State level, there are only TWO states that use it... that I'm aware of... Alaska, where Lisa Murkowski (a RINO)... who was scared to DEATH of losing her seat a couple years ago, and was able to IMPOSE Ranked Choice Voting, and hold on for ONE MORE election... BUT will probably NOT get a pass thru the Republican Primaries next time, and will LOSE BEFORE the general election as a result... and Maine?... I don't know what the hell is going on in Maine.

Still... anywhere where they use Ranked Choice Voting... people SHOULD be worried about election FRAUD !!
 

jerra b » 30 Apr 2025, 4:51 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 4:51 pm

ask him about the lie that trump says china was ripping off america.

It was and it wasn't only America they have been ripping off. They do it to their own people first even when America wasn't trading with them when it turned red..