Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

JuCo,

Can either of you prosecute the argument?

Then we're done here.

what's the argument?
 

Blackvegetable » 24 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

24 minutes ago

JuCo,

Can either of you prosecute the argument?

Then we're done here.

Are these your words??

https://i.postimg.cc/yxjhfJjF/BVs-Demands-Own-Work.jpg

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:02 am

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... t-100-days

Donald Trump promised Americans a “boom like no other” if they elected him president. But based on the stock market’s performance during his first 100 days in office, it depends on what you mean by “boom.”

The action certainly has been explosive — just not in the way investors were hoping. By April 30, Trump will have closed out his first 100 days in office. Despite last week’s rally, the S&P 500 Index is down about 8% since his inauguration and on track for its worst run during a president’s first 100 days since Gerald Ford in 1974, following Richard Nixon’s resignation. 

It’s a U-turn few on Wall Street saw coming after two straight years of over 20% gains and what was expected to be a pro-growth agenda. Instead, markets swung wildly as Trump slapped tariffs on basically every country where US companies operate — and then suspended some, carved out exceptions for certain industries, and ratcheted up the trade war with China.

Another thrilling episode of Grifticles’ Copy-Paste Chronicles:

You dump another Bloomberg article without a single original thought attached, like it’s supposed to do the arguing for you.
It's less “analysis” and more “Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V, Ctrl+RunAway.” Here’s the question you’ll dodge (probably before you even finish reading it):

Since you're clearly capable of copying headlines, can you explain—in your own words—how Trump's tariff strategy directly caused the S&P decline versus other global factors like Fed policy or international supply chain instability?

No links.
No "ask me why."
No reposted quotes from 2018. Just an actual answer. You know—something Socrates might've expected from a real gadfly... not a Dollar Store version. Clock's ticking, Grifticles.


1.Obviously his 4 step evasion  is coming.

Vegas » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

16 minutes ago

Another thrilling episode of Grifticles’ Copy-Paste Chronicles:

You dump another Bloomberg article without a single original thought attached, like it’s supposed to do the arguing for you.
It's less “analysis” and more “Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V, Ctrl+RunAway.” Here’s the question you’ll dodge (probably before you even finish reading it):

No links.
No "ask me why."
No reposted quotes from 2018. Just an actual answer. You know—something Socrates might've expected from a real gadfly... not a Dollar Store version. Clock's ticking, Grifticles.

1.Obviously his 4 step evasion  is coming.

global factors like Fed policy or international supply chain instability

show me the Fed Policy & Supply Chain instability to which you refer.

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

show me the Fed Policy & Supply Chain instability to which you refer.

Perfect — this is exactly his Step 2 Deflection move:

If you need me to explain your own OP to you, just admit you never understood it in the first place.
That’d be the first original thought you’ve had since 2017. Clock’s ticking, Professor Ctrl+C.

Grifticles.
This wasn’t my OP. It was yours.

• You’re the one who started this parade by posting Bloomberg links without a single original thought attached.
• You’re the one who declared Trump's tariffs were the problem.
• You’re the one now demanding I cite sources inside your own thread like a confused librarian trying to find his own books.

Vegas » 42 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

42 minutes ago

Perfect — this is exactly his Step 2 Deflection move:

If you need me to explain your own OP to you, just admit you never understood it in the first place.
That’d be the first original thought you’ve had since 2017. Clock’s ticking, Professor Ctrl+C.

Grifticles.
This wasn’t my OP. It was yours.

• You’re the one who started this parade by posting Bloomberg links without a single original thought attached.
• You’re the one who declared Trump's tariffs were the problem.
• You’re the one now demanding I cite sources inside your own thread like a confused librarian trying to find his own books.

Trying to bluff me is yet more evidence that you're a dumb ****...

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:49 pm

Trying to bluff me is yet more evidence that you're a dumb ****...

And dodge 128. Shocking. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:02 am

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... t-100-days

Donald Trump promised Americans a “boom like no other” if they elected him president. But based on the stock market’s performance during his first 100 days in office, it depends on what you mean by “boom.”

The action certainly has been explosive — just not in the way investors were hoping. By April 30, Trump will have closed out his first 100 days in office. Despite last week’s rally, the S&P 500 Index is down about 8% since his inauguration and on track for its worst run during a president’s first 100 days since Gerald Ford in 1974, following Richard Nixon’s resignation. 

It’s a U-turn few on Wall Street saw coming after two straight years of over 20% gains and what was expected to be a pro-growth agenda. Instead, markets swung wildly as Trump slapped tariffs on basically every country where US companies operate — and then suspended some, carved out exceptions for certain industries, and ratcheted up the trade war with China.

Lying *** traitor spews his fake **** again. 

murdock » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Lying *** traitor spews his fake **** again.

Walkies?


 

*Beekeeper » Today, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:16 am

Are these your words??

https://i.postimg.cc/yxjhfJjF/BVs-Demands-Own-Work.jpg

 

Vegas » Today, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:45 am

Another thrilling episode of Grifticles’ Copy-Paste Chronicles:

You dump another Bloomberg article without a single original thought attached, like it’s supposed to do the arguing for you.
It's less “analysis” and more “Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V, Ctrl+RunAway.” Here’s the question you’ll dodge (probably before you even finish reading it):

No links.
No "ask me why."
No reposted quotes from 2018. Just an actual answer. You know—something Socrates might've expected from a real gadfly... not a Dollar Store version. Clock's ticking, Grifticles.

1.Obviously his 4 step evasion  is coming.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

21 minutes ago

Walkies?

Lying *** traitor. Run from the cops.

*Beekeeper » Today, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:16 am

Are these your words??

https://i.postimg.cc/yxjhfJjF/BVs-Demands-Own-Work.jpg

**** you lying *** traitor. Stand you against a wall. 

murdock » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Lying *** traitor. Run from the cops.

You won't be needing your coat.....or shoes.....
 

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

You won't be needing your coat.....or shoes.....

Lying *** traitor. Run from the cops.

Blackvegetable » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

You won't be needing your coat.....or shoes.....

SMDWYMA
Hey ***, how you get in my avatar? Of course I refer to the piece of ****...