Liberal Forum

*GHETTOBLASTER » 29 Apr 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 6:31 am

but.....just last week BV "proved" she is a scientific genius because she was able to copy and paste a bunch of **** into a HS  Science Fair exhibit and then try to claim that she was doing "ground breaking research"......

 

nefarious101 » 29 Apr 2025, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 6:58 am

TWEEEEEET!!!...A Trigger has been called

MR-7 just triggered the hell out the the Dairy Queen Dickhead

A Cha-Ching has been awarded....

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 7:08 am

Someone was triggered alright...

Hey Dairy Queen Dickhead...

Having a little mental breakdown there....

just remember....."You Lost!"

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 7:57 am

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english?  It has been the law for years.

Have they ever allowed you behind the wheel of one?

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:12 am

Have they ever allowed you behind the wheel of one?

 

Your memory really, really sucks.  But back to the question:

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english?  It has been the law for years.

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 7:57 am

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english?  It has been the law for years.

what does he care as long as his SNAP benefits make it to the 7-11 on time...
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 7:51 am

 

 
 
 

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:13 am

Your memory really, really sucks.  But back to the question:

QED.

Is literacy correlated to good trucking?

If not, what will raising any such thresholds accomplish?
 

MR-7 » 29 Apr 2025, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:14 am

BV wants to suck Trump dick
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:15 am

QED.

Is literacy correlated to good trucking?

If not, what will raising any such thresholds accomplish?

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english?  It has been the law for years.

It has been federal law for years.   You are running from the question as usual.  

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:29 am

It has been federal law for years.   You are running from the question as usual.

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english? It has been the law for years.

Do we agree that this is the question?

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:31 am

Do we agree that this is the question?

 

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english? It has been the law for years.

We also agree that you have yet to answer it.  

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:35 am

We also agree that you have yet to answer it.

If that IS the question, then it either does, or does not, address an actual problem.

If it doesn't, it's propaganda....and self defeating.

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:47 am

If that IS the question, then it either does, or does not, address an actual problem.

If it doesn't, it's propaganda....and self defeating.

 

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english? It has been the law for years.

Keep running, NoStands, it is what you do best.

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:31 am

Do we agree that this is the question?

Huey's question is quite simple.

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english?


 

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:52 am

Keep running, NoStands, it is what you do best.

Another slogan you can rebleat, but not an argument you can prosecute..

SS, DD.

In this particular instance it is not informed by a specific problem associated with literacy.

That makes it, in my opinion, purely propaganda 

Is this clear?


As a general matter, do I believe literacy is a requirement for driving a tractor trailer?

In the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, I don't. 

Acknowledge that my stand cannot possibly be less ambiguous.

MR-7 » 29 Apr 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 8:53 am

Huey's question is quite simple.

Do you not want operators of 80,000 lb GVW rigs to be able to speak and read english?

 Of course....because @*HooooeyVagina is simple.


 

Blackvegetable » 29 Apr 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 9:06 am

Another slogan you can rebleat, but not an argument you can prosecute..

SS, DD.

In this particular instance it is not informed by a specific problem associated with literacy.

That makes it, in my opinion, purely propaganda 

Is this clear?

As a general matter, do I believe literacy is a requirement for driving a tractor trailer?

In the absence of credible evidence to the contrary, I don't. 

Acknowledge that my stand cannot possibly be less ambiguous.

Oh, ok.  So you don't care if a driver can read the sign that tells him the bridge is weight limited?  Or trucks not allowed in the left lane?  Or the upcoming overpass is less than 13' 6"?  Or the hills he is about to enter are grade 7?  And I have lots more.  But hey, your unambiguous stand is understanding reading english is not required.  

You did catch the part it is already the law, correct?
 
 

*Huey » 29 Apr 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

29 Apr 2025, 9:20 am

Oh, ok.  So you don't care if a driver can read the sign that tells him the bridge is weight limited?  Or trucks not allowed in the left lane?  Or the upcoming overpass is less than 13' 6"?  Or the hills he is about to enter are grade 7?  And I have lots more.  But hey, your unambiguous stand is understanding reading english is not required.  

You did catch the part it is already the law, correct?

Trucker who can’t speak English kills 5 in Texas …Mar 17, 2025 · ATU has confirmed: the driver behind today’s horrific Austin, TX crash—killing 5 and injuring 11—barely spoke English. Experts say he was almost certainly on a Non-Domicile CDL. Special interest groups have flooded our …

American Truckers Group Calls for Probe Into Non-English …

 Trucker who can’t speak English, kills 3 (Full video)May 13, 2024 · Usually, the inability to speak English does not bode well as a CDL driver, especially since it's supposed to be a federal requirement to speak English. Could point to his …