Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 02 May 2025, 5:07 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 5:07 am

This is the problem with Denny's Placemat History...those actions were forced on a reluctant Grifty.

Here Grifty working the balls.. 

"You don't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles," he said at the White House on Monday

you can almost smell the flop sweat..

I am having trouble seeing the disconnect. You are looking at precisely the evidence I am seeing - not denying it. But your interpretation of it is pretzeled. 

Yes, Trump is desperately trying to disengage from the tar baby - to drop the hot potato. Shazam. NATO LOST. Get it through your head. Trump is the past master at walking off an L. He does not throw good money after bad. He sneaks out the back with a duffel full of cash and leaves the obligations for the cleanup crew - and that is precisely what he is doing in CoupKraine. Europe owns the liabilities and the US owns the mineral rights.

You claim that the sanctions and the offensive weapons gift were "forced" on Trump. Is the whiff of gingivitis attending that claim the entirety of your evidence?

Shouting "HE HAD TO" doesn't change that he did. It's LIKE a denial - but a lot more like a foot stomp.

You know the US overthrew CoupKraine's democracy, and used it as a proxy. They're Kurds now - and Trump has a history with Kurds. ADJUST, idiot.

You know the sanctions failed. Europe's economies are shrinking and Russia's is growing. FAILURE. The US economy - by your own claim - is shrinking, while Russia's grows. FAILURE. The military campaign is no more successful than the economic one: FAILURE.

Savor the flavor. And get used to it. Empires die, and people adjust. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 7:54 am

I am having trouble seeing the disconnect. You are looking at precisely the evidence I am seeing - not denying it. But your interpretation of it is pretzeled. 

Yes, Trump is desperately trying to disengage from the tar baby - to drop the hot potato. Shazam. NATO LOST. Get it through your head. Trump is the past master at walking off an L. He does not throw good money after bad. He sneaks out the back with a duffel full of cash and leaves the obligations for the cleanup crew - and that is precisely what he is doing in CoupKraine. Europe owns the liabilities and the US owns the mineral rights.

You claim that the sanctions and the offensive weapons gift were "forced" on Trump. Is the whiff of gingivitis attending that claim the entirety of your evidence?

Shouting "HE HAD TO" doesn't change that he did. It's LIKE a denial - but a lot more like a foot stomp.

You know the US overthrew CoupKraine's democracy, and used it as a proxy. They're Kurds now - and Trump has a history with Kurds. ADJUST, idiot.

You know the sanctions failed. Europe's economies are shrinking and Russia's is growing. FAILURE. The US economy - by your own claim - is shrinking, while Russia's grows. FAILURE. The military campaign is no more successful than the economic one: FAILURE.

Savor the flavor. And get used to it. Empires die, and people adjust.

NATO LOST.

**** youtube/facebook educated morons.

 

Blackvegetable » 02 May 2025, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 8:26 am

**** youtube/facebook educated morons.

And **** you, sissy. If vanity fair tells you a photo of charles de gaulle is prince andrew, you're on the hook to insist upon it. You're an absolute idiot. At least the facebook educated are educable, you simple-minded jackwagon. You're merely programmable. 

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 8:43 am

And **** you, sissy. If vanity fair tells you a photo of charles de gaulle is prince andrew, you're on the hook to insist upon it. You're an absolute idiot. At least the facebook educated are educable, you simple-minded jackwagon. You're merely programmable.

I'm serious...

It is a brutally tedious exercise wading through that crap and trying to reprogram cretins susceptible to it.
 

Blackvegetable » 02 May 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 8:45 am

I'm serious...

It is a brutally tedious exercise wading through that crap and trying to reprogram cretins susceptible to it.

Just imagine what it is like to deal with a pseudo-intellectual cretin whose very eyes can be overcome by his ears. 
 

Cannonpointer » 01 May 2025, 8:14 pm » wrote: ↑

01 May 2025, 8:14 pm

The effect of inflation on any given purchase is impossible to know. So many inputs go into the price of things that you can have prices drop on some things while inflation soars. It isn't simple math to break out the effect of inflation on a given price tag - and as the OP pointed out, consumers already understand how inflation works. They don't understand a **** thing about tariffs - the majority believe that tariffs are paid by the country of origin. 

To answer your question, her lies were implicit - and I believe the OP did a fair to middling job of exposing the implicit lies. I will enumerate them as I saw the OP answer them:

1. Implicitly lied that Amazon could as easily have broken out Biden's inflation as it can break out Trump's tariffs;
2. Implicitly lied that both issues are equally hazy to consumers. 

Those are from the OP. I will add a third, of my own conception:

3. Implicitly lied that a firm which relies for its life blood on imports is being "partisan" when it kicks the shin of a president that is **** in its gravy bowl. 

FTR, I'm not defending Amazon. I'm just answering your question.

Seems an AI algorithm could have handled all the funny math on inflation, if the desire was there.

All consumers care about is the bottom line, most can’t even comprehend how it got there.


 

Blackvegetable » 30 Apr 2025, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Apr 2025, 5:39 am

Ms. Leavitt had ripped into Amazon on Tuesday morning while standing beside Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. She said that she had just been talking on the phone with the president about the Punchbowl report, and she also asked aloud in her briefing why Amazon hadn’t done such a thing when prices increased during the Biden administration because of inflation. Ms. Leavitt said it was “not a surprise” coming from Amazon, as she held up a copy of a 2021 article from Reuters with the headline “Amazon partnered with China propaganda arm.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/29/us/p ... rices.html

Let's begin with the Biden Dodge.

Inflation isn't a policy, it is a consequence.

Its causes are reasonably well established.

Tariffs are Grifty's policy tool. Their consequences are entirely discretionary. Don't want to pay the cost?

Don't impose them.

But if you call yourself Tariff Man, you own it.

From the Pootie Cockholster Administration.

Jesus Christ! Every minute of the day this sorry lying bastard spews ****. A truly obsessed traitor bastard. Choke on an orange dick you worthless piece of ****.

Cedar » 02 May 2025, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 8:54 am

Seems an AI algorithm could have handled all the funny math on inflation, if the desire was there.

All consumers care about is the bottom line, most can’t even comprehend how it got there.

Let's say it could have. What would Amazon's incentive be to provide that useless information? THAT would be partisan.

Kicking about tariffs isn't partisan, when tariffs are an existential threat to your business model.

Again, I don't own Amazon stock, and I'm not a big booster. I'm just answering the question of the thread. Ascribing Amazon's tizzy to partisanship is partisan hackery at its finest.
 

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 9:00 am

Let's say it could have. What would Amazon's incentive be to provide that useless information? THAT would be partisan.

Kicking about tariffs isn't partisan, when tariffs are an existential threat to your business model.

Again, I don't own Amazon stock, and I'm not a big booster. I'm just answering the question of the thread. Ascribing Amazon's tizzy to partisanship is partisan hackery at its finest.

You’re old enough to know that most things that come from the Press Secretary’s podium is partisan hackery. 
 

Cedar » 02 May 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 9:09 am

You’re old enough to know that most things that come from the Press Secretary’s podium is partisan hackery.

Thus, the OP is affirmed. 

And yes, if the press secretary isn't a partisan hack, the president is a **** idiot. So the OP is whining about a nothing burger. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 02 May 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 8:45 am

I'm serious...


 

You're a serious child molesting dick sucker!

Cedar » 02 May 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 9:09 am

You’re old enough to know that most things that come from the Press Secretary’s podium is partisan hackery.

And you're stupid enough not to realize that presidents hire press sec's who are on their side.

murdock » 02 May 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 10:01 am

And you're stupid enough not to realize that presidents hire press sec's who are on their side.

I think that’s what I said retard. Too many bong hits this morning?

**chuckle** 
 

Cedar » 02 May 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 10:03 am

I think that’s what I said retard. Too many bong hits this morning?

**chuckle**

No **** stain, that's not what you said, but you're too stupid to see that.

murdock » 02 May 2025, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 10:49 am

No **** stain, that's not what you said, but you're too stupid to see that.

Time for another bong hit to clear your mind?
 

Cedar » 02 May 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 11:20 am

Time for another bong hit to clear your mind?

Channeling again ***? I don't take drugs or smoke anything. I'm sure I know what your lying *** "smokes"!  *** bitch.

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 9:28 am

Thus, the OP is affirmed. 

And yes, if the press secretary isn't a partisan hack, the president is a **** idiot. So the OP is whining about a nothing burger.

No one capable of getting elected president is an idiot. Biden was not elected. You are a media fed fool.
 
 

murdock » 02 May 2025, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 3:59 pm

No one capable of getting elected president is an idiot. Biden was elected. You are a media fed fool.

Incorrect. Biden had the elections stolen by his owners.

YOU are the media fed fool. 

Cannonpointer » 02 May 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 4:37 pm

Incorrect. Biden had the elections stolen by his owners.

YOU are the media fed fool.

No, it was a typo, I somehow left out the word "not".
As in "not elected". That piece of senile **** and the **** traitors stole the election. I hope they all choke.
 
As far as the lying media, I believe very little of what those bastards say.
 
 

murdock » 02 May 2025, 5:17 pm » wrote: ↑

02 May 2025, 5:17 pm

No, it was a typo, I somehow left out the word "not".
As in "not elected". That piece of senile **** and the **** traitors stole the election. I hope they all choke.
 
Ad far as the lying media, I believe very little of what those bastards say.

Yet you falsely accused me of doing so - in spite of my posting history.

This tells me it is not only your own posts that you do not bother to read. You do not bother to read the posts of those you slander. That makes you a **** poster.