Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 9:44 am

Because you have no idea to which thread @*HooooeyVagina was referring.

Posts have nothing to do with why you are owed 140 dodges. Try again. 

Actually, it's related to the lack thereof...ask yourself why. 

 

Vegas » 06 May 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 9:46 am

Posts have nothing to do with why you are owed 140 dodges. Try again. 

Actually, it's related to the lack thereof...ask yourself why.

That, and your cowardice, of course....

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 9:51 am

That, and your cowardice, of course....

You are owed 140 dodges. 

Ask yourself why. 

Vegas » 06 May 2025, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 9:54 am

You are owed 140 dodges. 

Ask yourself why.

I just answered myself.

Twice.

 

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 9:56 am

I just answered myself.

Twice.

You lied to yourself. 

Twice. 

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 9:10 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 9:10 am

Cheddy,

Link me to the crap to which you're referring.

https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-tariffs ... ue-2065333
 

Cedar » 06 May 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 11:28 am

https://www.newsweek.com/trumps-tariffs ... ue-2065333

We can both agree that this was not your source, right?


Did you read the entire thing?

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 11:58 am

We can both agree that this was not your source, right?

Did you read the entire thing?

That's not relevant.  What is relevant is if it is factually correct.

*Huey » 06 May 2025, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:30 pm

That's not relevant.  What is relevant is if it is factually correct.

Tiny,

As a moron, you're incapable of sorting relevant from chum.

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:45 pm

Tiny,

As a moron, you're incapable of sorting relevant from chum.

 

Idiot, you are a troll, plain and simple.  Not to be taken seriously.  

*Huey » 06 May 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:46 pm

Idiot, you are a troll, plain and simple.  Not to be taken seriously.

Why do you presume to tell anyone what is "relevant"?


You have no idea.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:51 pm

Why do you presume to tell anyone what is "relevant"?


You have no idea.
 


 

Edit

 
 

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:51 pm

Why do you presume to tell anyone what is "relevant"?


You have no idea.
 


 

Is the story factually correct or not?  You have no idea.  
 
 

*Huey » 06 May 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:57 pm

Is the story factually correct or not?  You have no idea.

What part of what story?

I'm guessing you didn't read the citation.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:59 pm

What part of what story?


 

I can safely assume that you will be demanding answers to this while you dodge questions from everyone else. 

**** idiot. 

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 1:45 pm

Tiny,

As a moron, you're incapable of sorting relevant from chum.

Like you can tell the separation between hyperbole about yesterday, hypothetical for tomorrow, theories and theologies governing today while everyone estimates life beyond time adapting in space as spontaneously alive in a specific generation gap achieved after birth, simultaneously here in a perpetual balancing state of evolving in natural order of ancestral lineages arriving one at a time, living eternally separated now.

Blackvegetable » 06 May 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 11:58 am

We can both agree that this was not your source, right?

Did you read the entire thing?

Yes I read the whole thing, and yes that was my source.
 

Cedar » 06 May 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

06 May 2025, 4:37 pm

Yes I read the whole thing, and yes that was my source.

Doubt it.

Doubt it.

You must consider these "positives"

Despite the gains, collections still fell far short of the lofty claims made by the president. During an Oval Office meeting on April 14, Trump declared, "Now we're making $3 billion a day." However, official data show the daily average was just $918 million — less than a third of Trump's claim.....

A Barron's analysis also found that "tariff revenue remains far below the amount collected through individual income taxes," noting that fully replacing income taxes would require an average tariff rate of 74 percent — a level economists say would effectively sever the U.S. from global trade.

The Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) estimated that the tariffs imposed as of April 8 would generate $5.2 trillion over a decade, but at the cost of slashing U.S. GDP by 6 percent and lowering wages by 5 percent over the long term.


"These losses are twice as large as a revenue-equivalent corporate tax increase from 21 percent to 36 percent," the Penn Wharton team said in their April analysis.

The immediate impact on households could be sharp. The Tax Foundation projects that the tariffs will function as the largest tax hike since 1993, with an average cost of $1,243 per American household this year alone. Household after-tax incomes are expected to fall by about 1.2 percent in 2025.

 Middle-class families are likely to bear the brunt of the fallout. According to Penn Wharton, a typical middle-income household could lose around $22,000 in lifetime earnings because of the tariffs.


 

That’s better than nuttin

BuckNaked » 07 May 2025, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑

07 May 2025, 5:51 am

That’s better than nuttin

Which is what you have between your legs.

Enjoy thy thumb up yo azz.. Nobody is going to be able to afford baseball tickets this year.